Linux Ubuntu Iso Image Download

0 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted

Higinia Livoti

unread,
Jul 15, 2024, 7:30:19 AM7/15/24
to afcattheastma

Search in specific suite:[focal][focal-updates][focal-backports][jammy][jammy-updates][jammy-backports][mantic][mantic-updates][mantic-backports][noble][noble-updates][noble-backports][oracular]Limit search to a specific architecture: [i386] [amd64] [powerpc] [arm64] [armhf] [ppc64el] [riscv64] [s390x] You have searched for packages that names contain linux-image-generic in all suites, all sections, and all architectures.Found 23 matching packages.

linux ubuntu iso image download


Descargar archivo https://tweeat.com/2yOHpr



Search in specific suite:[focal][focal-updates][focal-backports][jammy][jammy-updates][jammy-backports][mantic][mantic-updates][mantic-backports][noble][noble-updates][noble-backports][oracular]Limit search to a specific architecture: [i386] [amd64] [powerpc] [arm64] [armhf] [ppc64el] [riscv64] [s390x] You have searched for packages that names contain linux-image in all suites, all sections, and all architectures.Found 100 matching packages.

However, it seems impossible to download the image from the dell support website. Depending on what you pick it either does download a broken much too small ISO (50kb or something), or does not download anything at all.

I also tried to install debian with an unofficial image for the dell xps 9360 (there is none for the 9370, but they mostly have very similar hardware, or at least can have) but it fails to load the wifi drivers. Arch volks seem to have figured out how to run their thing on the 9370. Maybe i can take the drivers they use to install other linux distros, or maybe ill just try arch for the first time ever.

Have you tried just a regular Ubuntu 16.04 image? According to this Ubuntu page, the 9370 is fully supported out of the box with that release, no need for special drivers or anything else that would come in a Dell image. The Dell image would probably also wipe out your Windows installation even if it existed, whereas a vanilla Ubuntu installer will detect a Windows installation and offer to let you keep it.

The certification page says that " has been awarded the status of certified pre-install for Ubuntu" and "Standard images of Ubuntu may not work at all on the system or may not work well..." which make me think twice.

Heads Up NOTE: Do NOT even try to install these current "unsigned linux-images" not recommended as doing so trashed my system, my system borked when attempting to install said kernel.

So if I you want to have an equivalent image with the same packages installed, what do you need to add to for example Ubuntu 22.04 image in community repository images:ubuntu/22.04/cloud? Is perhaps there a cloud-init or some similar script that makes this as painless as possible?

We try to keep our images as small as possible while still being functional out of the box.
The official Ubuntu images instead focus on providing the same content across all targets, but that leads to a bunch of unrelated stuff being included.

I noticed some users having problems with the App Image in Linux Ubuntu (and other distros) where the program may freeze when trying to enter data into a drop box. I am running linux mint and had a similar experience. I however found a solutions to the issue by using App Image launcher available at AppImageLauncher - Appimagehub.com.

Same for Ubuntu 20.04 and other Linux distros that seem to suffer, I was wondering which desktop interface you installed such as Gnome and which version. Reason being as I do not suffer any problems with Server Edition on a Ubuntu 20.04 TLS on a VPS which obviously has no desktop interface installed and just uses the browser interfaces of the internet connected devices. As this seems to pertain to Desktop the troubleshooting should include the desktop interface being used hence the question.

A supported image is the latest major version of an image available in CodeBuild and is updated with minor and patch version updates. CodeBuild optimizes the provisioning duration of builds with supported images by caching them in the machine's Amazon Machine Images (AMI). If you want to benefit from caching and minimize the provisioning duration of your build, select Always use the latest image for this runtime version in the Image version section of the CodeBuild console instead of a more granular version, such as aws/codebuild/amazonlinux2-x86_64-standard:4.0-1.0.0.

A deprecated image is an image that is no longer cached or updated by CodeBuild. A deprecated image no longer receives minor version updates or patch version updates, and because they are no longer updated, using them may not be secure. If your CodeBuild project is configured to use an older image version, the provisioning process will download this docker image and use it to create the containerized runtime environment, which can increase the provisioning duration and overall build duration.

I am using Waveforms on Ubuntu with Analogue Discovery 2 hardware. All works well on a local Ubuntu install. However in order to roll this out for student laboratories we will be using a Ubuntu image on a VDI and the VMWare Horizon client on Windows for access. When I attempt this the Waveforms application runs does not see the Analogue Discovery 2 Device. The Analogue Discovery USB device has been attached/connected to the VDI client and is listed when I type lsusb on a linux terminal. Is this something that should work, or are there any known solutions? If not what are the recommended workarounds?

The context of what I am trying to do is use the Analogue Discover 2 as a test instrument for DSP hardware practicals for my students. My preference is to use Ubuntu as the C/DSP development platform and therefore also to have Waveforms running on Ubuntu as the test instruments. At my university Ubuntu is provided over the VDI - they don't want to support dual boot as this disables the secure booth facilities (aparently). Any suggestions welcome. A fallback is to do it all on Windows but this would, in my opinion, be very much second best.

The lsof utility tells me that waveforms is accessing the Analog Discovery PRO via /dev/bus/usb/003/010, which lines up with the middle entry above. I had a quick look at that device entry and got this.

Thanks. I have tried this but still to no avail. Does the Waveforms App have a timeout for response on scanning the USB ports and could that be causing a problem? I have been able to get this to work with other USB devices such as embedded development boards, so am at a bit of a loss.

The device serial number and other info are not listed. This could indicate that some other process or application is taking control over the USB device, probably the default USB serial service.
The udev rules installed by adept.runtime should prevent this. Have you tried reconnecting the device after installing this ?

Thanks Attila. I have tried what you suggested but it still gives the same result showing 1 device under FTDI corresponding to the device being connected and 0 under DMGR and DWF. As far as I am aware the VDI requires VHCI drivers for USB which have to be rebuilt every time the kernel is updated. Could this be causing a problem? I would like to know if anyone else has got this software working on a VDI to find out a solution. Otherwise I guess we will have to have the students doing their courseworkr on the VDI Ubuntu image but using the Windows host OS to run the instrumentation software which is not ideal.

I don't have any experience running our software in a VDI setup but have successfully used it with VMWare and VirtualBox, where the VM is hosted on the local hardware. I quickly skimmed a description of how VDI works and was given the impression that it involves one or more servers hosting the virtual machine with clients connecting remotely with through a local client running on their own hardware. Is this correct? Is the Analog Discovery connected to the server running the VM, or is it connected to a local desktop / think client that remotely connects to a server hosting the VM?

Maybe the UDEV rules are being applied correctly. If that's the case RW permission may not be assigned to the files created for the USB device. Have you tried running the software with "sudo" to see if that makes any difference?

Thanks,
Michael

@malexander - Yes the VDI is as you described - the Ubuntu image is running on the cloud and we use a client (VMWare Horizon) running on Windows to connect to it. THe client can pass through USB. This is how our IT department set it up so they don't have to manage individual local lab images.

@attila I already suggested using WSL 2 or even using Docker images but they won't have this due to security concerns. In the past I have used VirtualBox successfully but this also isn't supported now we have the VDI which was introduced during the COVID lockdowns to support students working from home..

I already use the VDI to connect to USB development boards (Xilinx Vivado connecting to an FPGA and gdb connecting to an ARM Embeddded DSP board) successfully so I don't think it is the UDEV rules. What I am trying to do is also use the Analogue Discovery boards with Waveforms software to provide the diagnostic tools for the DSP work instead of oscilloscopes and signal generators. My backup plan would be to run Waveforms on the Windows host with the development on the VDI but I would still prefer an all VDI solution - just as it would be more convenient for the students.

I suspect that the issue may be related to the FTDI driver (libftd2xx.so). You could try downloading the tar.gz for Adept Runtime 2.17.1 that matches your platform and use the FTDI driver from that version to replace the library installed on your system. If that resolves the issue then we know it's being caused by something FTDI changed in their driver.

Interesting. I wonder if it's all versions > 1.0.4 or just some of them. The release notes imply that there were a lot of releases between 1.0.4 and 1.4.24. We didn't test them all... only the ones we included in the installer. If you can find an old download link you might try some of the newer ones and see if it makes any difference. I think it's also worth trying the latest (1.4.27) to see if that resolves the issue. Please share any additional information you discover here.

d3342ee215
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages