Questions about calculation of QWs under biased condition

[ms.kojima]

Hi,

I'm using aestimo2.0 for calculating characteristics of my devices using
InP-based quantum wells. I'm happy because it supports quarternary now.

I have some questions. Attached pptx is describing the situation.
Questions are
included in the pptx. I would appreciate your reply.
Thanks in advance.

[h.h...@yahoo.fr]

Hi,

We are not using that field setting anymore, you should use vmin and vmax applied voltage with computation scheme number 7, 8 or 9.

Best regards

Hamza

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "aestimo-users" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to aestimo-users+unsub...@googlegroups.com.

To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/aestimo-users/e26fada40f9d90be22ba98f281d90aa2%40takanori.jp.net.

[h.h...@yahoo.fr]

Hi Takanori

here are your answers:

A4- yes.

A5-see the attached files where some modification are made to save all polarization cases (will be committed in GitHub later ).

A6-you can check other examples where we use selected length to account for Quantum calculations (wave functions and quantum states).  

A7-for the wave function, it was disabled and now it works but only for the last polarization (will be fixed). For now use this values as in the attached file vmax=-3 vmin=-4 to get the last wave functions for v=-3.

regards

hamza

Le mercredi 30 septembre 2020 à 10:03:35 UTC+2, ms.kojima <ms.k...@takanori.jp.net> a écrit :

Hi Hamza,

I have another question.
I think that a folder of which name ends with "_eh" is a calculated
results under biased condition. However I can't find wavefunctions and
states
in it. Could you please tell me how to get them under biased condition?

Regards,
Takanori

On 2020-09-30 07:29, h.h...@yahoo.fr wrote:
> Hi,We are not using that field setting anymore, you should use vmin