You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Link
Report message as abuse
Sign in to report message as abuse
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to aedict...@googlegroups.com
Hello Martin,
I've been using Aedict3 for years now, and I'm still pleased of it.
However, I think since the last time I reinstalled the application, the integrated voice search seems to have changed. Maybe I forgot something, but I cannot find the solution in helps and web.
I think (maybe I dreamed ??) that when using the voice search, a list of possible matching words was appearing and that I was just to select the right one (in case of many homophons).
Could you clarify this point to me please ?
Thank you very much for your work !
With best regards,
Jean-Pierre.
B
Martin Vysny
unread,
Nov 4, 2022, 2:02:16 AM11/4/22
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
Link
Report message as abuse
Sign in to report message as abuse
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to aedict...@googlegroups.com
Hi Jean,
thank you for your e-mail, I'm happy to know that Aedict is serving
you well :)
Aedict never performed the speech-to-text itself. Aedict always relied
on the Android built-in speech recognition capabilities (or any
additional software that was capable of handling the
"android.speech.action.RECOGNIZE_SPEECH" intent), to perform
voice-to-text conversion. The speech recognition software then returns
one or more strings (= readings); 2 or more in case of homophones.
Could it be that an Android upgrade changed this behavior, or maybe you
have installed another software which handles the
"android.speech.action.RECOGNIZE_SPEECH" intent?
I'm not using this functionality much myself so I haven't noticed the
change, but now I tried a couple of homophones and Android always seems
to return just one result (maybe the most common one). Looks like Google
upgraded or changed something...