aboue keyword perfomance report

16 views
Skip to first unread message

YUNZE ZHANG

unread,
Jul 2, 2019, 6:22:46 AM7/2/19
to AdWords API and Google Ads API Forum

Hi, I'm an engineer working in Septeni・Original, JP. 
I have a question about keyword performance report and I hope you could answer it please.

I got the keyword performance report from the google adwords API with the filter "where("IsNegative").equalTo("true")", and I got the data with blank values in column "Approval Status","Label IDs","Labels".
 (the data period is one year) I think it should not be accidental, so I tried two years but I got the same result.
I read the document, bu tI didn't get the message I wanted in the document.
So I want to ask that when isNegative="true", could I be sure I'm going to get blank value of these columns?

Thank you very much.

Zhang


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
もし、このメッセージが誤って貴殿に送信されたと思われる場合には、
機密情報を含んでいる可能性もありますので、どなたにも転送せず、
付属したファイルも含めて削除していただくとともに、発信者にその旨を
お伝えいただきますようお願いいたします。
This email may be confidential or privileged.
If you received this communication
by mistake, please don't forward it to anyone else,
please erase all copies and documents,
and please let me know that it went to the wrong person.
Thank you very much.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Google Ads API Forum Advisor Prod

unread,
Jul 3, 2019, 1:14:46 AM7/3/19
to adwor...@googlegroups.com
Hi Zhang,

The ApprovalStatus field is only applicable at the BiddableAdGroupCriterion level. Negative criterion such as keywords currently do not require any approvals, hence, the ApprovalStatus field of your negative keywords in the report is returned as blank.

As for the labels, could you confirm if you have indeed applied Labels, using the AdGroupCriterionService.mutateLabel(), to your (Keyword) NegativeAdGroupCriterion and still the report returned the fields as blank?

Thanks and regards,
Peter
Google Ads API Team

ref:_00D1U1174p._5001UCaaqR:ref
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages