Thanks.
Yes, I asked since I didn't see that kind of mapping documented.
"The mapping I shared with you earlier is the field mapping between the AdWords API and Google Ads API."Yes, I understood that, thank you.
"You could simply tell..."
Not really, it's not so simple to tell, since we're managing a large number of reports with 25-30 data fields each.
What you say here means I have to go through every report, request it, pull it, see what is returned and visually map the returned data fields to the requested data fields.
What makes things worse is that in the returned JSON the fields seem to be omitted when they have no value (instead of returned with null value or something like that).
"the only difference is that one uses snake naming convention and the other uses camel"
Can I assume this is the general rule, i.e. does that rule always hold true?
I mean if I request xyz.this_one_field will I always get back xyz.thisOneField?
Or... are there exceptions to this rule?
Thanks once again.