> Culture and Implicit Self-esteem :Chinese Are Good and Bad at the Same
> Time( Helen C. Boucher et al. 2009 )
One explanation for the lower self-esteem of East Asians is that they
have dialectical, or inconsistent, self-esteem in that they endorse
both the positively and the negatively keyed items of the Rosenberg
Self-Esteem Scale, relative to Euro-Americans. The following research
extended this effect to implicit self-esteem. In two studies, Chinese,
Euro-Americans (Studies 1 and 2), and Chinese Americans (Study 2)
completed explicit and implicit measures of selfesteem. On both types
of measures, Chinese scored most highly on various indices of
dialectical self-esteem. In Study 2, the explicit self-esteem of
Chinese Americans was similar to that of Chinese, but their implicit
self-esteem was identical to that of Euro-Americans. In the
discussion, we focus on how East Asians come to possess inconsistent
self-esteem and pose questions for future research.
> Cultural Similarities in Self-Esteem Functioning :East Is East and
> West Is West, But Sometimes the Twain Do Meet ( Jonathon D. Brown, et
> al.2009 )
East Asians report lower levels of self-esteem than North Americans
and Western Europeans. These differences could mean that self-esteem
is a culturally bounded construct, experienced differently in
different cultures, or they could mean that self-esteem is a
universally relevant construct whose average level is raised or
lowered in different cultures. To examine these possibilities, the
authors assessed self-esteem functioning in China and America. Study 1
found that, across cultures, self-serving attributions are stronger
when self-esteem is high than when it is low. Study 2 replicated this
finding and also found that, across cultures, failure produces less
emotional distress when self-esteem is high than when it is low.
Because self-esteem functioned similarly in China as in America, the
authors conclude it is of general psychological importance
> Moderating Effects of Three Coping Strategies and Self-Esteem on
> Perceived Discrimination and Depressive Symptoms: A Minority Stress
> Model for Asian International Students (Meifen Wei , et al. 2008)
This study examined 3 coping strategies (reflective, suppressive, and
reactive), along with self-esteem, as moderators of the relation
between perceived discrimination and depressive symptoms.
International students (N 354) from China, India, Korea, Taiwan, and
Hong Kong provided data via an online survey. The role of perceived
general stress was statistically controlled. Hierarchical regression
analyses indicated a significant direct effect of perceived
discrimination, a significant 2-way interaction of perceived
discrimination and suppressive coping, and a significant 3-way
interaction of perceived discrimination, reactive coping, and self-
esteem in predicting depressive symptoms. An increased tendency to use
suppressive coping appeared to strengthen the association between
perceived discrimination and depressive symptoms. In contrast, the
association between perceived discrimination and depressive symptoms
was not significant when reactive coping was infrequently used, but
only for students with relatively high self-esteem.
> Psychosomatic Symptoms in Medical Outpatients:An Investigation of Self-
> Handicapping Theory (Pamela Balls Organista et al. 1991)
Investigated self-handicapping theory as it relates to somatization in
medical patients. We predicted that medical outpatients (N = 113)
would report psychosomatic symptoms in response to events that
threaten their self-esteem. As predicted, results of hierarchical
multiple regression indicated that high-perfectionism patients
reported somatic symptoms positively related to the number of events
that jeopardize their sense of accomplishment, whereas low-
perfectionism patients' somatic symptoms were not related to these
events (p = .005). Contrary to prediction, high-dependency patients
did not differ significantly from low-dependency patients in the
relationship of somatic symptoms and events that threatened their
interpersonal relationships (p = .115). Implications of these findings
and the utility of self-handicapping theory for predicting
somatization in medical patients are discussed.
> The Double-Edged Sword of Self-Handicapping: Discounting,
> Augmentation,and the Protection and Enhancement of Self-Esteem (David
> L. Feick
> et al.1997)
A field study was conducted to test the hypothesis that discounted and
augmented ability self-attributions mediate the interactive effects of
claimed self-handicaps and academic success and failure on self-
esteem. College students were assessed for individual differences in
self-handicapping and self-esteem at the beginning of the term and
then completed a checklist of clamed self-handicaps immediately
preceding their first in-class exam. At the following class, graded
exams were returned to the students, who then completed measures of
mood, self-esteem, and performance attributions. High self-
handicappers claimed more excuses prior to the test. Among failing
students, claimed handicaps were associated with greater discounting
of ability attributions and higher self-esteem. Among successful
students, claimed handicaps were associated with augmented ability
attributions and enhanced self-esteem. However, we failed to find
support for sex differences in claimed self-handicapping. The
implications of the present research with regard to the functional
utility of self-handicapping behavior are discussed.
> When the Stakes are Higher: Self-esteem Instability and Self-
> handicapping (Leonard S. Newman et al. 1997)
The relationship between self-esteem stability and self-handicapping
was examined. Previous research by Tice (1991) suggested that people
with high and low self-esteem self-handicap for different reasons:
High self-esteem people do so to enhance success, while people with
low selfesteem do so to protect themselves against the threatening
implications of failure. It was hypothesized that these tendencies
would be exaggerated in people with unstable self-esteem, because when
self-esteem is unstable, people are more sensitive to evaluative
feedbaclc and more concerned about their self-views (Kernis, 1993).
Results of an experiment involving 106 college students confirmed the
predictions and further implicate self-esteem instability as a
motivator ofbehaviors that serve to enhance and protect self-
esteem.People would rather feel good than bad