--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Adventures In Deep Space" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to adventuresindeep...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/adventuresindeepspace/CAGmLLxv_N%2B%2BrYt-eQajLQ7W_wRMmq6HZsrzbt1fseESx0oRMvQ%40mail.gmail.com.
Hi Scott et al.,
This is my first mail in this group, so I hope it works right away. :-) Scott, we seem to have very similar observing projects!
Indeed, the definition of a quasar seems to be subjective. Physically, they are very luminous examples of Seyfert galaxies, but the question is where to draw the limit between a quasar and an "ordinary" Seyfert galaxy.
In this catalog there is a list of quasars: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...518A..10V/abstract
They define a quasar as a starlike object or object with a starlike nucleus with broad emission lines that is brighter than -22.25 Mag absolute blue magnitude.
Interestingly, many objects listed in this catalog don't fulfill their magnitude criterion based on Simbad data, although they referenced Simbad data in their catalog.
Within the last couple of years I observed some of those objects. At least I Zw 1 (PGC 3151) and VII Zw 118 = PGC 20174 fulfill their criterion. With my 20" Dobsonian I was able to discern non-stellar galaxy bodies from their stellar cores when observing them.
At Deep Sky Meting in March 2026 in southern Germany I will give
a presentation on this topic. So for readers who will attend
(there certainly are a few...) I will discuss this quasar catalog
and observations I did based on this source.
Clear skies,
Robin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Adventures In Deep Space" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to adventuresindeep...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/adventuresindeepspace/a788f10a-e3c6-4827-9fe7-d47f60ab6539n%40googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/adventuresindeepspace/712B47E3-E439-4F6B-BCD4-80B841E1D5EA%40gmail.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/adventuresindeepspace/DF35406E-BF92-4400-9A4D-B83FCC2815A6%40gmail.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/adventuresindeepspace/CAGmLLxsYoF%3D5AcQ5WXnaty2oDAO1twegP%3DUd-wueTUs771rVDw%40mail.gmail.com.
Wolfgang wrote a booklet for the Webb Soc on extra galactic objects discovered as variable stars many years ago.
After some internal discussions we decided we could release Wolfgangs guide as a free PDF so others could see the work.
Owen
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/adventuresindeepspace/d36a7e96-5568-437b-af97-e6526b64eecan%40googlegroups.com.
Get Outlook for Mac
Hopefully we will have the full version with cover up on the web site soon for download.
Interesting topic. I have to visit some more objects from the lists.
Thanks for the .pdf Owen
From the four objects Steve mentioned, I can contribute two sketches:
http://www.deepsky-visuell.de/Zeichnungen/UGC6132_UGC6140.htm
http://www.deepsky-visuell.de/Zeichnungen/UGC8058.htm
uwe
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/adventuresindeepspace/8E57519E2D1E4109A9523688E8A2626F%40PC.
Thanks for sharing your notes, Alvin. My research shows that despite how they were first discovered, V395 Her and UX Psc don't show up in any recent works as containing an AGN.
Hi everyone,
After my presentation regarding quasar host galaxies at the Deep Sky Meeting 2026 in Germany last weekend, I will summarize my findings in this post as promised back in January. It seems that there is no uniform distinction between Seyfert I galaxies and quasars in scientific literature.
There is the „Catalogue of quasars and active nuclei: 13th edition“ my M.P. Véron-Cetty and P. Veron: https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/pdf/2010/10/aa14188-10.pdf and
https://cdsarc.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/cat/VII/258
In this paper a quasar is defined as follows:
Stellar object or object with stellar nucleus, with broad emission lines, and with a blue luminosity larger than -22.25 Mag.
But there is another definition by E.P. Smith et al., „On the nature of QSO host galaxies“, https://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?1986ApJ...306...64S&defaultprint=YES&filetype=.pdf
According to that paper a quasar is an active galactic nucleus with a blue luminosity larger than -22.25 Mag, which is more luminous than the surrounding host galaxy.
So I examined the catalog mentioned above and observed quite a few objects listed there with my 20“ Dobsonian.
Among them were the following objects:
NGC 6166: An elliptical galaxy, whose nucleus appeared mottled and sometimes stellar (20“, 419x). However, the luminosity of its nucleus is only -21.5 blue Mag according to M. Lachièze-Rey et al.:
https://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/pdf/1985A%26A...150...62L
PGC 100408: Elongated blob with stellar nucleus (20“, 419x). I did not find a paper analyzing this object, but Gaia DR3 lists its nucleus as a 15.8 mag stellar object, yielding -21.5 blue Mag (and this may even include part of the host), thus falling short of the definition above.
PGC 20174 (VII Zw 18): Stellar center with a diffuse hue. Field stars of similar magnitude had a stellar appearance (20“, 419x). This object was listed by Fu-zhen Chen:
https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/212/4/857/1086083
having -22.0 blue Mag luminosity, falling short of the definition above.
PGC 3151 (I Zw 1): At direct vision, a stellar nucleus was visible. At averted vision, the stellar nucleus was surrounded by a diffuse hue. Field stars of similar magnitude appeared stellar (20“, 419x). The blue luminosity of this galaxy is -22.9 Mag, the blue luminosity of its nucleus -22.5 Mag according to J. Scharwächter et al., thus the AGN is more luminous than its -22.0 blue Mag host galaxy, Thus, the quasar criteria are fulfilled for this object.
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/pdf/2003/27/aah4270.pdf
Summarizing, with my 20“ at 419x magnification, according to the definition mentioned above, I Zw 1 was the only quasar whose host galaxy I was able to observe visually. More of such objects may be visible with larger aperture.
Clear skies,
Robin
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Adventures In Deep Space" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to adventuresindeep...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/adventuresindeepspace/CY5PR02MB88944A34EA6F95F805DF5CD3AE71A%40CY5PR02MB8894.namprd02.prod.outlook.com.