need a .net 2.0 version

6 views
Skip to first unread message

Thava

unread,
Sep 10, 2009, 10:31:18 PM9/10/09
to Advantage Builder
this is a small suggestion why don't you release this exe for .net2.0

Michael Shapiro

unread,
Sep 14, 2009, 3:02:18 AM9/14/09
to Advantage Builder
The complexity of supporting and maintaining multiple projects makes
it unviable. The .net2.0 Framework is actually required as well as the
JSCript engine was dropped in later versions. So in effect you need
both .net2.0 and 3.5.

Are you able to install 3.5 on you r development box? That's all you
need. You can still generate code for whatever framework or language
you need...

Thava

unread,
Sep 14, 2009, 9:33:51 PM9/14/09
to Advantage Builder
thanks for your reply,
but in my company they do their projects in .net 2.0 and earlier
versions, they said " if i install the 3.5 framwork the system will
become slow and some projects may be corrupt or source may be changed
when i try to open it" is it true explain a little bit

On Sep 14, 12:02 pm, Michael Shapiro <advantagebuil...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > this is a small suggestion why don't you release this exe for .net2.0- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Michael Shapiro

unread,
Sep 15, 2009, 2:32:21 AM9/15/09
to Advantage Builder
In my opinion you can have all versions of .net installed on your
machine without causing conflicts. In Visual Studio 2008 you can
specify what version to target for your project. Visual Studio 2005
would automatically default to .net 2.
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages