Namaskaram,
Are there online lectures or talks in Tamil or English that cover 2.2.18-27 in depth where “Bauddha realists” are refuted? A lot of the argument seems to be about their idea of momentariness. I want to know in what sense we have difference and alignment with their ideas on internal and external (material and mental) world. We also accept in vyavaharika, gross and subtle bodies, viraat/vishwa and hiranyagarbha/taijasa. Do these match the Buddhists? We also talk of causal body and of course of the Atma as the underlying unchanging reality. So, are we saying that the Buddhist model is incomplete without these, leading them to wrong notions of momentariness etc.? (If so what is and why exactly is a causal body needed?)
thollmelukaalkizhu