Namaskaram,
A member "SwaminarayanSanskritVidyaPratishthanam <
ssvp...@gmail.com> sent the below post with a question on Sanskrit grammar. Since it is entirely posted in Sanskrit, I am sending through my mail with an added Google translate. Members who wish to reply in Sanskrit can do so to his personal email, or if you reply here, are requested to provide an English translation as well. Also, since this is not focused on advaita, any extended discussion on this topic should not happen in our group but in private.
thollmelukaalkizhu
---------------
नमस्ते विद्वासः ।
प्रश्नो मे वर्तते व्याकरणस्य । यः कोऽपि जानाति प्रत्युत्तरं देहि कृपया । अधोलिखिता रूपसिद्धिः समीचीना न वा? इति समाधेयम् ।
तेभ्यो दर्श्यम् - ‘ तेभ्यस् + दर्श्यम् ’ इति स्थिते “ झलां जशोऽन्ते ” इति सूत्रेण सकारस्य दकारे प्राप्ते, तं बाधित्वा “ ससजुषो रुः ” इति सूत्रेण सकारस्य रुकारे “ भोभगोअघोअपूर्वस्य योऽशि ” इति सूत्रेण रुकारस्य यकारे प्राप्ते, तं प्रबाध्य “ हशि च ” इति सूत्रेण रुकारस्य उत्वे “ आद्गुणः ” इति सूत्रेण गुणे प्राप्ते, तं संबाध्य “ प्रथमयोः पूर्वसवर्णः ” इति सूत्रेण पूर्वसवर्णदीर्घरूपैकादेशे प्राप्ते “ नादिचि ” इति सूत्रेण तन्निषेधे सति ‘ अपवादे निषिद्धे उत्सर्गस्य स्थितिः ’ इति न्यायात् “ आद्गुणः ” इति सूत्रेण गुणरूपैकादेशे कृते ‘ तेभ्यो दर्श्यम् ’ इति सिद्धम् ।
Obeisance to you, Vidvasa.
I have a question about grammar. Anyone who knows please answer. Isn't the form perfection below correct? This is the solution.
Tebhyo darshyam - When ‘ tebhyas + darshyam ’ is obtained in the dakara of the sakara by the formula “ jhalam jasho’ante ”, it is interrupted by the formula “ sasajusho ruḥ ” in the rukara of the sakara When the rukara is obtained in the yakara by the formula “ bhobhagoaghoapurvasya yo'shi ”, it is forced by the formula “ hashi cha ” and the rukara is obtained in the utve by the formula “ adgunah ” By binding it, the formula “ prefix of the first two ” obtained the prefix long form singular, and when it was forbidden by the formula “ nadichi ”, the formula “ adguna ” made the singular form of the quality by the formula “ adguna ” according to the law of ‘ the position of exclusion in forbidden exception ’‘ They should be shown ’ is proved.