Dear Sadaji,
I just had a look at the attachment with your mail. Prof. Raghavan meshed up things and that is why he faced the consequences, that he became absolutely clueless. So also became his blind followers. First and foremost he flouted the time-honoured tradition which says that 3102 BCE is the year when Lord Krishna left for his heavenly abode, at the age of 125 years and a few months. One great (Kannadiga?) astrologer from Bangalore had shown years ago that modern astronomy supports the traditional year of birth of Lord Krishna in 3228 BCE. Prof. Raghavan ended up with the absurd date of 3112 BCE as the date of Lord Krishna. That is why he and his blind supporters had not been able to find the year of the Mahabharata war, even after years of toil. The Mahabharata war took place at the end of the sandhya-period of the Dwapara yuga, when 99 % of the Dwapara yuga was over. In the Vana Parva of Mahabharata, Hanumanji told Bhima that the Kali Yuga was yet to come, obviously because Kali Yuga started only when Lord Krishna passed away.
One who has read the Mahabharata well, knows that just before the Mahabharata war there was a 13-day eclipse pair and two Saros-cycles later (i.e. after 36 years of that) there was another 13-day eclipse pair. It is a pity, that Prof Raghavan and his supporters totally ignored these eclipse pairs, even though both the sage Vedavyasa (just when the Mhabahratawar started) and Lord Krishna (36 years later) spoke highly about these eclipse pairs.
These scholars also never cared to find out what were the sane observations of the great Mahabharata scholar Nilakantha (from Kerala?), about the date of passing away of Bhishma. Since all there are "Apriya Satyas" let us not discuss much about it in our Advaitn forum.
Jai Shri Krishna
Sunil KB