Brahman alone is called Agni, Narayana, Indra, etc. - Kurma Purana

[V Subrahmanian]

कूर्मपुराणम्-उत्तरभागः/षड्चत्वारिंशत्तमोऽध्यायः

https://sa.wikisource.org/s/43o

गीयते सर्वशक्त्यात्मा शूलपाणिर्महेश्वरः ।

एनमेके वदन्त्यग्निं नारायणमथापरे ।

इन्द्रमेके परे प्राणं ब्रह्माणमपरे जगुः ।

ब्रह्मविष्णवग्निवरुणाः सर्वे देवास्तथर्षयः ।

एकस्यैवाथ रुद्रस्य भेदास्ते परिकीर्त्तिताः ।

यं यं भेदं समाश्रित्य यजन्ति परमेश्वरम् ।

तत् तद् रूपं समास्थाय प्रददाति फलं शिवः ।

Some call Ishvara as fire,  others call him Narayana, some call him Indra, some call him Prana, and yet others call him Brahma. In truth, Brahma, Vishnu, Agni, Varuna, all gods and sages are glorified as transformations of a single existence - Rudra. Shiva appears before the devotee in the form in which they worship the Supreme Lord, to give them the reward accordingly.

The above is based on the Veda. 

Shankara has quoted this in his commentary on the Brahma Sutras. These Vedic statements are elaborated in many Puranas. 

‘इन्द्रं मित्रं वरुणमग्निमाहुः’ (ऋ. १ । १९४ । ४६) Ṛg Veda 1.164.46.:

इन्द्रं॑ मि॒त्रं वरु॑णम॒ग्निमा॑हु॒रथो॑ दि॒व्यः स सु॑प॒र्णो ग॒रुत्मा॑न् । एकं॒ सद्विप्रा॑ बहु॒धा व॑दन्त्य॒ग्निं य॒मं मा॑त॒रिश्वा॑नमाहुः ॥४६॥

‘एष ब्रह्मैष इन्द्र एष प्रजापतिरेते सर्वे देवाः’ (ऐ. उ. ३ । १ । ३)

These Vedic statements apply only in Advaita, naturally and without complicated interpretations.

Om Tat Sat

[Bhaskar YR]

praNAms

Hare Krishna

 

Yes whatever is there it is brahman ONLY and nothing but brahman, Rishi vAmadeva realized this truth in his mother's womb.  brahman is not only mere agni, vayu, sUrya etc. he is even fishermen, slaves, and gamblers as well and he is having kAma, krOdha as well...It has to be noted here all these visheshaNa-s has been explained by shruti keeping transmigrating jeeva in mind though he is brahman  in  his svarUpa.  It should not be read other way round like brahman itself is kAmamaya, krOdhamaya adharma maya etc.  The bottom line is whatever you see whether it is auspicious or inauspicious there exists brahman ONLY nothing but brahman.  IN this sense does avidyA also brahman ONLY??  Na!!  after realizing the sarvAtmabhAVa / Atmaikatva jnAna the jnAni realizes that there was / is / never be an entity called avidyA/ajnAna in him or elsewhere 🙂

 

Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!

 

BHASKAR YR

 

From: adva...@googlegroups.com <adva...@googlegroups.com> On Behalf Of V Subrahmanian
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2024 12:06 PM
To: A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta <adva...@lists.advaita-vedanta.org>; Advaitin <adva...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [advaitin] Brahman alone is called Agni, Narayana, Indra, etc. - Kurma Purana

 

Warning

This email comes from outside of Hitachi Energy. Make sure you verify the sender before clicking any links or downloading/opening attachments. If this email looks suspicious, report it by clicking 'Report Phishing' button in Outlook. See the SecureWay group in Yammer for more security information.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "advaitin" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to advaitin+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/advaitin/CAKk0Te2fgy-A9dxf%3DPkkGs5Dwsb-EOwOt7viMV6q%2BmA_Z%2B7KzA%40mail.gmail.com.

[SREENATH N]

Namaste,

After Realizing , the claim is There was no Avidya in him or elsewhere . 

So  is there a bhava of duality w.r.t time, viz. "after realizing and before realizing" for an entity thats making the above claim. If there is a bhava of duality for that entity( may be intellect) can we claim that it acquired the bhava of True Jnana which is non dualistic in nature.  There is a verse Brahma Veda Bhrahmaiva Bhavati right.

Rgds,

Sreenath

Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer

[Bhaskar YR]

praNAms Sri Srinath prabhujji

Hare Krishna

 

• Since you maintained brevity in asking, I too would keep it to simple and short 😊

 

Namaste,

After Realizing , the claim is There was no Avidya in him or elsewhere . 

 

Ø     Yes the above statement is right from horse mouth!!  bhashyakAra clarifies this in sUtra bhAshya. 

 

So  is there a bhava of duality w.r.t time, viz. "after realizing and before realizing" for an entity thats making the above claim. If there is a bhava of duality for that entity( may be intellect) can we claim that it acquired the bhava of True Jnana which is non dualistic in nature.  There is a verse Brahma Veda Bhrahmaiva Bhavati right.

 

Ø     The bhAva i.e. time, space and causation is within the realm of duality used to convey something non-dual 😊

 

Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!

bhaskar