praNAms
Hare Krishna
This ‘galAte’ (squabble) is often witnessed between rudra-vishNu or shiva-vishNu only, we don’t often see this type of argument when devi is worshipped as para brahma svarUpiNi or some feminine realized soul says : ahaM rudra, nArAyaNa dashAkruti ( dashAvatAra) emanated from the finger nail tip of the devi (karAnguli nakhOtpanna nArAyaNa dashAkrutiH) or when gaNesha or sUrya has been addressed as tvameva pratyakshaM brahma (sAkshAt brahma) etc. But we have lot of points to argue nArAyaNAt rudrO jAyate etc. why it is like this?? Is this because in hindu pantheon these two are most adored celebrities !!?? 😊
Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
bhaskar
praNAms
Hare Krishna
I agree that most of the purANEtihAsa mainly dealing with these two deities. But if one willing, definitely he can fetch out more references with regard to other paNchAyatana devata-s as well like gaNesha, devi, sUrya nArAyaNa for that matter skanda also.
Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
bhaskar
I think one more reason is that even in texts like Mahabharata and Ramayana as welll we find statements/stotras which talk about vishnu and shiva partatva. It’s difficult to find such statements on Devi or Ganesha etc in the ithihasa texts.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "advaitin" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to advaitin+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/advaitin/AM7PR06MB6625FB8CEC680653E41898AB841F2%40AM7PR06MB6625.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com.