jivanmukti & Lord Rama query

141 views
Skip to first unread message

aham brahmaasmi

unread,
Dec 10, 2024, 3:23:59 AM12/10/24
to Advaitin, A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta
नमो विद्वत्सभायै ! 

I have heard that Lord Rama, on hearing about Sitamata's abduction, was so 'shokaakula' (grief-stricken), that He went around asking the trees, streams , birds of her whereabouts.   Also, that he also even contemplated suicide.  I have read this in a couple of places, also mentioned in ? one of the puranas (via  Parampujya Swami Ishwarananda Giri maharaj's talk). 

 Lord Rama was an avatar-purusha, and as per yoga-vasishtha, displayed very high SCS, vairagyam etc. even at age 12-13. He got instructed in Brahmavidya soon after, which clearly makes him a jnani ( in addition to  avatar purusha. ).  

So my questions are 

1)  what is jivanmukti then? If someone like Lord Rama could get this affected, (to even contemplate suicide), what to say about ordinary individuals like me ?  Yet, on the other hand, my Guru, and all mahatmas too probably,  emphatically reiterate that it is possible  to get jivanmukti in this very janma. 

2) And how can Lord Rama's above-stated response (IF it is correct), be reconciled with BG  'gurNApi dukhena na vichAlyate' ?  

I am sorry I am unable to trace the exact video, but it is  one of Swami Ishwarananda Giriji's  

Most importantly, this is only a very sincere question that has bothered me for very long. 

thanks in advance, for your replies, 
sakshi 


Akilesh Ayyar

unread,
Dec 10, 2024, 3:31:21 AM12/10/24
to adva...@googlegroups.com
The answer, quite simply, is that the outer behavior, and even one’s emotions, need not reflect the deepest inner state. Jivanmukti is not the perfection of the body-mind, but rather the non-identification with the states of the body-mind, whatever they may be. 

In the BG verse you cite, gurNApi dukhena na vichAlyate, the jnani is not affected by sorrow. But who is the jnani? The jnani is precisely the one not identified with the body-mind. 

Akilesh Ayyar


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "advaitin" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to advaitin+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/advaitin/CADKAaHshw%2Bj2X7RA_Gy4pSbLCQC0K1rG5_eJ1cpCZJqqKFJ5hw%40mail.gmail.com.

लोकेश

unread,
Dec 10, 2024, 11:23:59 PM12/10/24
to Advaitin
नमस्ते Akilesh Ji

You said that jivanmukti is not the perfection of mind-body and that jnani is one who is not identified by by the mind-body. 

However what is it that you consider jnani here? Do you consider jnani as the mind, Atman or something different?



Venkatraghavan S

unread,
Dec 11, 2024, 12:05:04 AM12/11/24
to Advaitin, A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta
Namaste,
The answer to this question reminds me of the "loke vihara rAghava" verses from Yoga Vashishtha -

पूर्णां दृष्टिमवष्टभ्य ध्येयत्यागविलासिनीम् ।
जीवन्मुक्ततया स्वस्थो लोके विहर राघव ।। १७
अन्तः संत्यक्तसर्वाशो वीतरागो विवासनः ।
बहिः सर्वसमाचारो लोके विहर राघव ।। १८
उदारः पेशलाचारः सर्वाचारानुवृत्तिमान् ।
अन्तः सर्वपरित्यागी लोके विहर राघव ।। १९
प्रविचार्य दशाः सर्वा यदतुच्छं परं पदम् ।
तदेव भावेनालम्ब्य लोके विहर राघव ।। २०
अन्तर्नैराश्यमादाय बहिराशोन्मुखेहितः ।
बहिस्तप्तोऽन्तराशीतो लोके विहर राघव ।। २१
बहिः कृत्रिमसंरम्भो हृदि संरम्भवर्जितः ।
कर्ता बहिरकर्तान्तर्लोके विहर राघव ।। २२
ज्ञातवानसि सर्वेषां भावानां सम्यगन्तरम् ।
यथेच्छसि तथा दृष्ट्या लोके विहर राघव ।। २३
कृत्रिमोल्लासहर्षस्थः कृत्रिमोद्वेगगर्हणः ।
कृत्रिमारम्भसंरम्भो लोके विहर राघव ।। २४
त्यक्ताहंकृतिराश्वस्तमतिराकाशशोभनः ।
अगृहीतकलङ्काङ्को लोके विहर राघव ।। २५
आशापाशशतोन्मुक्तः समः सर्वासु वृत्तिषु ।
बहिः प्रकृतिकार्यस्थो लोके विहर राघव ।। २६

Kind regards,
Venkatraghavan 

Akilesh Ayyar

unread,
Dec 11, 2024, 12:14:10 AM12/11/24
to adva...@googlegroups.com
This is one of those questions that shows the ultimate inability of mere logic to answer ultimate questions. The mind cannot be jnani since it is the product of ignorance; the atman need not be, since it cannot be ignorant. So then who is it? One must look into who asks this question. Then the question and questioner both turn out to be mere fictions.

Akilesh Ayyar

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "advaitin" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to advaitin+u...@googlegroups.com.

V Subrahmanian

unread,
Dec 11, 2024, 2:53:19 AM12/11/24
to adva...@googlegroups.com
Recently I saw a video short of Swami Sarvapriyananda.  He related this incident:

https://vivekavani.com/jan3/

Swami Turiyananda was born on 3 January 1863

One day at Cossipore Harinath (Swami Turiyananda) asked, “Sir, how are you?” The Master replied: “Oh, I am in great pain. I cannot eat anything, and there is an unbearable burning in my throat.” Harinath knew that a knower of Brahman is beyond the pairs of opposites, pleasure and pain. He understood that the Master was testing him, so he said to him humbly, “Sir, whatever you may say, I see you as an infinite ocean of bliss.” At this, Sri Ramakrishna said with a smile, “This rascal has found me out.”

(p.364, God Lived With Them)

Swami Sarvapriyananda continued to say another related incident: When Harinath persisted seeing Ramakrishna in pain, the latter replied: It's only the mind that becomes a sage and not the body. 

regards

subbu

Sudhanshu Shekhar

unread,
Dec 11, 2024, 3:49:09 AM12/11/24
to adva...@googlegroups.com
Namaste Akilesh ji, 

//The mind cannot be jnani since it is the product of ignorance; the atman need not be, since it cannot be ignorant. So then who is it?//

This dilemma would be present even while defining ajnAnI. It is not exclusive to jnAnI.

Whether it is jnAnI or ajnAnI, in srishTi-drishTi-vAda, he is a jIva. And hence, the standard definition of jIva i.e. अन्तःकरण-तत्संस्कार-अवच्छिन्न-अविद्या-प्रतिबिम्बित-चैतन्य will apply with full force to both ajnAnI and jnAnI.

If we check the definition, the only distinctive feature between jnAnI and ajnAnI will arise on account of अन्तःकरण or तत्संस्कार. So, we need to admit that there is a distinction in the quality of antah-karaNa which is delimiting avidyA-pratibimbita-chaitanya.

The antah-karaNa delimiting avidyA-pratibimbita-chaitanya in case of jnAnI has a specific manO-vritti named advaita-jnAna and is coupled with absence of asambhAvanA and viparIta-bhAvanA. In the case of ajnAnI, the delimitor antah-karaNa is devoid of these features.

Regards.
Sudhanshu Shekhar.



On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 10:44 AM Akilesh Ayyar <aki...@siftingtothetruth.com> wrote:


--
Additional Commissioner of Income-tax,
Pune

sudhanshushekhar.wordpress.com

Akilesh Ayyar

unread,
Dec 11, 2024, 3:58:58 AM12/11/24
to adva...@googlegroups.com

Akilesh Ayyar



On Dec 11, 2024 at 12:48:53 AM, Sudhanshu Shekhar <sudhans...@gmail.com> wrote:
Namaste Akilesh ji, 

//The mind cannot be jnani since it is the product of ignorance; the atman need not be, since it cannot be ignorant. So then who is it?//

This dilemma would be present even while defining ajnAnI. It is not exclusive to jnAnI.

Yes, that’s correct. 

The below is mere words. It’s all very seemingly neat and conceptually plain. In reality, however, it is anything but. 

Kalyan

unread,
Dec 11, 2024, 4:19:24 AM12/11/24
to advaitin
Namaste 

There is a discussion between sage Utanka and Lord Krishna in Mahabharata (14.53) that can be relevant here. Lord Krishna says this - 

    अधर्मे वर्तमानानां सर्वेषामहमप्युत | धर्मस्य सेतुं बध्नामि चलिते चलिते युगे ||१५|| तास्ता योनीः प्रविश्याहं प्रजानां हितकाम्यया ||१५|| यदा त्वहं देवयोनौ वर्तामि भृगुनन्दन | तदाहं देववत्सर्वमाचरामि न संशयः ||१६|| यदा गन्धर्वयोनौ तु वर्तामि भृगुनन्दन | तदा गन्धर्ववच्चेष्टाः सर्वाश्चेष्टामि भार्गव ||१७|| नागयोनौ यदा चैव तदा वर्तामि नागवत् | यक्षराक्षसयोनीश्च यथावद्विचराम्यहम् ||१८|| मानुष्ये वर्तमाने तु कृपणं याचिता मया | न च ते जातसंमोहा वचो गृह्णन्ति मे हितम् ||१९||

"In a desire to ensure the welfare of subjects, I enter various wombs. O descendant of the Bhrigu lineage! When I am born in a divine womb, there is no doubt that I follow all the acts followed by the gods. O descendant of the Bhrigu lineage! O Bhargava! In that way, when I am born in the womb of a gandharva, I then make all the efforts that are made by gandharvas. When I am in the womb of a serpent, I then behave like a serpent. When I am born in the wombs of yakshas and rakshasas, I then follow their kinds of conduct. Since I am now a human, I beseeched them piteously."

The simple explanation is that since Lord Rama is born as a human, he behaves like humans.

Best Regards

Sudhanshu Shekhar

unread,
Dec 11, 2024, 4:28:45 AM12/11/24
to adva...@googlegroups.com
Namaste Akilesh ji.

The below is mere words. It’s all very seemingly neat and conceptually plain. In reality, however, it is anything but. 

It is in accordance with bhAshya and sampradAya. There is nothing logically incoherent here so as to sustain a statement such as //This is one of those questions that shows the ultimate inability of mere logic to answer ultimate questions.//

These are standard and basic issues on which concepts are clearly articulated. Such clear articulation cannot and should not be summarily dismissed.

Reference:

1. अन्तःकरण-तत्संस्कार-अवच्छिन्न-अविद्या-प्रतिबिम्बित-चैतन्य (SiddhAnta Bindu: Page 89: https://archive.org/details/SiddhantaBinduShriMadhusudanaSarasvati/page/n113/mode/2up)

2. अद्वैतज्ञानं मनोवृत्तिमात्रम् (ChhAndOgya Upanishad BhAshya: 1.1)

Regards.
Sudhanshu Shekhar.

Bhaskar YR

unread,
Dec 11, 2024, 4:33:56 AM12/11/24
to adva...@googlegroups.com

अद्वैतज्ञानं मनोवृत्तिमात्रम्

 

praNAms Sri Sudhanshu prabhuji

Hare Krishna

 

advaita jnAnaM manOvrutti mAtraM…yatO vAchO nivartante aprApya manasa saha….please elaborate…no time to discuss in detail…just wanted to know your view points.

 

Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!

bhaskar

 

BHASKAR YR

 

From: adva...@googlegroups.com <adva...@googlegroups.com> On Behalf Of Sudhanshu Shekhar
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2024 2:58 PM
To: adva...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [advaitin] jivanmukti & Lord Rama query

 

Warning

 

This email comes from outside of Hitachi Energy. Make sure you verify the sender before clicking any links or downloading/opening attachments.
If this email looks suspicious, report it by clicking 'Report Phishing' button in Outlook.
See the SecureWay group in Yammer for more security information.

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "advaitin" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to advaitin+u...@googlegroups.com.

Sudhanshu Shekhar

unread,
Dec 12, 2024, 12:42:00 AM12/12/24
to adva...@googlegroups.com
Hare Krishna Bhaskar prabhu ji.

 advaita jnAnaM manOvrutti mAtraM…yatO vAchO nivartante aprApya manasa saha….please elaborate…no time to discuss in detail…just wanted to know your view points.


"YatO vAchO nivartante" refers to nirvishesha-nirguNa-Brahman and states that nirguNa-nirvishesha-Brahman is not a vishaya of vAk or manas. You cannot objectify it like a chair or table. As long as your mind goes, it is not Brahman. [गो गोचर जहँ लगि मन जाई। सो सब माया जानेहु भाई॥]

"advaita jnAnam manOvritti mAtram" refers to advaita-jnAna and not to nirvishesha-nirguNa Brahman. 

What exactly is this advaita-jnAna? 

It is basically as follows -- Seen is illusory and Brahman is not this seen. 

What is seen? 

Anything which possesses शब्दाजन्यवृत्तिविषयत्व or स्वव्यवहारे-स्वातिरिक्तसंविदपेक्षानियतिरूपत्व or अवेद्यत्वे सत्यपरोक्षव्यवहारयोग्यत्वाभावरूपत्व, is seen.

Seen is illusory and Brahman is not seen. This is advaita-jnAna. It is a manO-vritti. It is not avidyA-vritti because it is pramA and removes avidyA. PramA is always from a pramANa which is necessarily a manO-vritti. 

How does it function:

Coupled with nididhyAsana and manana leading to removal of viparIta-bhAvanA and asambhAvanA respectively, this advaita-jnAna is in the form of akhanDAkArA-vritti. This vritti does not have a seen as its vishaya. A manO-vritti not having a seen as vishaya is called akhanDAkArA-vritti or BrahmAkArA-vritti or AtmAkArA-vritti.

prArabdha-rUpa-pratibandhaka-vishishTa-akhanDAkArA-vritti-pratibimbita-chaitanya leads to removal of प्रपञ्चे पारमार्थिकत्वादिभ्रमहेतुशक्ति: and प्रपञ्चे अर्थक्रियासमर्थत्वसम्पादकशक्ति: of avidyA but does not remove  अपरोक्षप्रतिभासयोग्यार्थाभासजनिकायाः शक्ति:. prArabdha-rUpa-pratibandhaka-rahita-akhanDAkArA-vritti-pratibimbita-chaitanya leads of removal of अपरोक्षप्रतिभासयोग्यार्थाभासजनिकायाः शक्ति: also. 

Regards.
Sudhanshu Shekhar.

P.S.
Sorry if I went beyond my brief while elaborating. 🙂

Bhaskar YR

unread,
Dec 12, 2024, 12:52:10 AM12/12/24
to adva...@googlegroups.com

praNAms Sri Sudhanshu prabhuji

Hare Krishna

 

Thanks for sharing your view points.  There cannot be nirguNa nirvishesha jnAna after all anything about jnAna as prama is not / cannot be referring to nirguNa nirvishesha jnAna. As all jnAna is vrutti mAtraM.  Is this what you are saying??

 

Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!

bhaskar

 

BHASKAR YR

 

From: adva...@googlegroups.com <adva...@googlegroups.com> On Behalf Of Sudhanshu Shekhar
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2024 11:12 AM
To: adva...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [advaitin] jivanmukti & Lord Rama query

 

Warning

 

This email comes from outside of Hitachi Energy. Make sure you verify the sender before clicking any links or downloading/opening attachments.
If this email looks suspicious, report it by clicking 'Report Phishing' button in Outlook.
See the SecureWay group in Yammer for more security information.

Hare Krishna Bhaskar prabhu ji.

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "advaitin" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to advaitin+u...@googlegroups.com.

Sudhanshu Shekhar

unread,
Dec 12, 2024, 1:20:26 AM12/12/24
to adva...@googlegroups.com
Hare Krishna Bhaskar prabhu ji.

Thanks for sharing your view points.  There cannot be nirguNa nirvishesha jnAna after all anything about jnAna as prama is not / cannot be referring to nirguNa nirvishesha jnAna. As all jnAna is vrutti mAtraM.  Is this what you are saying?


We need to understand what is meant by the word jnAna. 

Nirvishesha-jnAna is chaitanya, nirguNa-Brahman. 

Vishesha-jnAna is vritti-pratibimbta-chaitanya.

Vritti can be either manO-vritti or avidyA-vritti. 

PramA-jnAna is necessarily manO-vritti-pratibimbita-chaitanya. Non-pramA is avidyA-vritti-pratibimbita-chaitanya. Sakshi-jnAna is non-pramA-jnAna.

advaita-jnAna is a vishesha-jnAna. It is a pramA-jnAna. It therefore requires manO-vritti.

I am not saying that the word "jnAna" cannot be used for nirguNa-nirvishesha-Brahman. Rather jnAna itself can be classified as nirvishesha and vishesha. The former being shuddha chaitanya, whereas the latter being vritti-pratibimbita-chaitanya.

When the word "jnAna" is used to refer to shuddha chaitanya, jnAnatva refers to jaDa-anyatva-vishishTa-tAdAtmya-upalakshita-swarUpatva or artha-prakAshatva-vishishTa-tAdAtmya-upalakshita-swarUpatva.  

Regards.
Sudhanshu Shekhar.

putran M

unread,
Dec 13, 2024, 2:33:28 PM12/13/24
to adva...@googlegroups.com
Namaskaram Sakshi-ji,

Our experience watching a movie may have some parallel. We run through a gamut of emotions, as if the characters are real and the events are happening live. Yet it is all in fun, knowing fully well that we are real and unchanged by the outcomes and the movie is patently unreal. If we are watching a cartoon movie with children who can't discriminate, we may also go along with the story as if believing it, just to support the children.

Likewise, expect a jivanmukta has 100% conviction that He is the unchanging Self of all and yet at BMI level, can also be a witness to and participant in the Play simultaneously.

thollmelukaalkizhu

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "advaitin" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to advaitin+u...@googlegroups.com.

Bhaskar YR

unread,
Dec 16, 2024, 1:21:09 AM12/16/24
to adva...@googlegroups.com

praNAms

Hare Krishna

 

Likewise, expect a jivanmukta has 100% conviction that He is the unchanging Self of all and yet at BMI level, can also be a witness to and participant in the Play simultaneously.

 

Ø     And as per some jeevanmukta’s participation is due to ‘avidyAlesha’ ( a remnant of his previously acquired avidyA), so jeevanmukta is in strict sense not ‘completely realized one’.  Hence Videha mukti considered as ‘mukhya mukti’ and jeevanmukti as ‘gaUNa mukti’.  Someone would even say : brahma jnAna / realization would bring ‘immediate physical death of that jnAni’ as dehadhAraNa (embodiedness) is avidyAkruta.  And one who attains this feat (sadyOmukti) is called ‘sadyOmukta’. 

Sudhanshu Shekhar

unread,
Dec 16, 2024, 2:36:26 AM12/16/24
to adva...@googlegroups.com
Namaste Bhaskar ji.


 And as per some jeevanmukta’s participation is due to ‘avidyAlesha’ ( a remnant of his previously acquired avidyA), so jeevanmukta is in strict sense not ‘completely realized one’.  Hence Videha mukti considered as ‘mukhya mukti’ and jeevanmukti as ‘gaUNa mukti’. 


In srishTi-drishTi-vAda, avidyAlesha is present during jIvanmukti. avidyAlesha refers to that shakti of avidyA which is the cause of objects which are eligible for aparOksha-perception (अपरोक्षप्रतिभासयोग्यार्थाभासजनिकायाः शक्तिः). This continues despite jnAna because prArabdha-rUpa-pratibandhaka is present. Other shakti namely  प्रपञ्चे पारमार्थिकत्वादिभ्रमहेतुशक्तिः  and प्रपञ्चे अर्थक्रियासमर्थत्वसम्पादकशक्तिः  are removed. Since these two shakti are removed, which are the cause of bondage, the term "mukti" is very much apt for jIvanmukti.

Someone would even say : brahma jnAna / realization would bring ‘immediate physical death of that jnAni’ as dehadhAraNa (embodiedness) is avidyAkruta.  And one who attains this feat (sadyOmukti) is called ‘sadyOmukta’. 


Where have you read this that sadyOmukti entails physical death? Please cite a reference other than klesha-apahAriNI.

SadyOmukti and jIvanmukti are distinguished. Naishkarmya Siddhi, along with commentary by Chitsukhacharya, 4.56 to 4.61 may be perused. The two views are distinguished. Here also, the jIvanmukti is stated as the alternative

सम्यग्ज्ञानशिखिप्लुष्टमोहतत्कार्यरूपिणः   सकृन्निवृत्तेर्बाध्यस्य किं कार्यमवशिष्यते ॥ ५९ ॥  
 
वास्तवेनैव वृत्तेनाविद्यायाः प्रध्वस्तत्वात् न किञ्चिदवशिष्यत इत्युक्तः परिहारः । 

अथापरस्साम्प्रदायिक:-  निवृत्त सर्प: सर्वोत्थं यथा कम्पं न मुञ्चति I विध्वस्ताखिलमोहोऽपि मोहकार्यं तथात्मवित् ॥६०॥  

Please note that both views are in accordance with sampradAya as mentioned by Naishkarmya Siddhi. Cgitsukhacharya says -   एवं सद्योमुक्तिपक्षमङ्गीकृत्य शेषशेषिभावः परिहृतः । अधुना तात्पर्यमाह - वास्तवेनैवेत्यादिना- जीवन्मुक्तिक्षे न शेषशेषिभाव इत्युत्तरग्रन्थस्य
तात्पर्यमाह । 

That there are two descriptions mukti, namely sadyOmukti and jIvanmukti is clear from Naishkarmya Siddhi. 4.54 to 59 is sadyOmukti, and 4.60 onwards is jIvanmukti. 

Regards.
Sudhanshu Shekhar.

Bhaskar YR

unread,
Dec 17, 2024, 12:04:55 AM12/17/24
to adva...@googlegroups.com

praNAms Sri Sudhanshu prabhuji

Hare Krishna

 

In srishTi-drishTi-vAda, avidyAlesha is present during jIvanmukti.

 

  • Mukti and avidyAlesha both can co-exist like tamaH-prakAsha in SDV!!??  What type of mukti it is when this mukta is still having the traces of avidyA ??  can there be a complete eradication of sarpa jnAna and complete (paripUrNa) knowledge of rajju,  when one is still having the traces of sarpa jnAna!!??

 

avidyAlesha refers taNo that shakti of avidyA which is the cause of objects which are eligible for aparOksha-perception (अपरोक्षप्रतिभासयोग्यार्थाभासजनिकायाः शक्तिः). This continues despite jnAna because prArabdha-rUpa-pratibandhaka is present.

 

  • When you are still talking about pratibandhaka there is no meaning to mukti here…Please share what is your understanding of ‘mukti’ ?? 

 

Other shakti namely  प्रपञ्चे पारमार्थिकत्वादिभ्रमहेतुशक्तिः  and प्रपञ्चे अर्थक्रियासमर्थत्वसम्पादकशक्तिः  are removed. Since these two shakti are removed, which are the cause of bondage, the term "mukti" is very much apt for jIvanmukti.

 

Ø     Again big big nomenclature to avidyA shakti!!  Which is ultimately concluded as Kalpita and adhyArOpita.  Anyway as I said above when you are talking about pratibaNdhaka you cannot talk about jeevamukti.  Very sanctity of ‘mukti’ pada will be lost when there is an iota of pratibandhaka / avidyAlesha.  Eha brahmaNi nAnA nAsti kiMchana aNumAtramapi.  So some sort of pratibaNdhaka and jeevanmukti cannot co-exist in a same person / jnAni.

 

Someone would even say : brahma jnAna / realization would bring ‘immediate physical death of that jnAni’ as dehadhAraNa (embodiedness) is avidyAkruta.  And one who attains this feat (sadyOmukti) is called ‘sadyOmukta’. 

 

Where have you read this that sadyOmukti entails physical death? Please cite a reference other than klesha-apahAriNI.

 

Ø     Just find out in later vyAkhyAna-s it must have been said.  And in kleshApahAriNi this type of non-sense stand has been completely refuted by Sri SSS. 

 

SadyOmukti and jIvanmukti are distinguished. Naishkarmya Siddhi, along with commentary by Chitsukhacharya, 4.56 to 4.61 may be perused. The two views are distinguished. Here also, the jIvanmukti is stated as the alternative

 

सम्यग्ज्ञानशिखिप्लुष्टमोहतत्कार्यरूपिणः   सकृन्निवृत्तेर्बाध्यस्य किं कार्यमवशिष्यते ५९   

 

वास्तवेनैव वृत्तेनाविद्यायाः प्रध्वस्तत्वात् किञ्चिदवशिष्यत इत्युक्तः परिहारः  

 

अथापरस्साम्प्रदायिक:निवृत्त सर्प: सर्वोत्थं यथा कम्पं मुञ्चति I विध्वस्ताखिलमोहोऽपि मोहकार्यं तथात्मवित् ॥६०॥  

Please note that both views are in accordance with sampradAya as mentioned by Naishkarmya Siddhi. Cgitsukhacharya says -   एवं सद्योमुक्तिपक्षमङ्गीकृत्य शेषशेषिभावः परिहृतः अधुना तात्पर्यमाह - वास्तवेनैवेत्यादिना- जीवन्मुक्तिक्षे शेषशेषिभाव इत्युत्तरग्रन्थस्य

तात्पर्यमाह  


That there are two descriptions mukti, namely sadyOmukti and jIvanmukti is clear from Naishkarmya Siddhi. 4.54 to 59 is sadyOmukti, and 4.60 onwards is jIvanmukti. 

 

Ø     Brahmaiva hi muktyAvasthA, na-cha brahmaNOnekAkArayOgOsti clarifies bhAshyakAra in sUtra bhAshya.  The difference you are talking about between sadyOmukta and jeevanmukta is quite untenable considering the fact that sashareeratvasya mithyAjnAnanimittatvAt. 

 

  • By the way in SDV and ajAtavAda different types of mukti-s advocated by bhAshyakAra according to you???

Sudhanshu Shekhar

unread,
Dec 17, 2024, 1:18:47 AM12/17/24
to adva...@googlegroups.com
Hare Krishna Bhaskar prabhu ji.

Mukti and avidyAlesha both can co-exist like tamaH-prakAsha in SDV!!??  What type of mukti it is when this mukta is still having the traces of avidyA ??  can there be a complete eradication of sarpa jnAna and complete (paripUrNa) knowledge of rajju,  when one is still having the traces of sarpa jnAna!!??


Here, the example of mirage is more apt. When one understands that mirage is not water but mirage, he stops running after it to quench thirst. However, the perception of water continues. This is an example of sOpAdhika-bhrama wherein the perception of bhrama-vastu would continue till the upAdhi is present. However, since the bhrama is removed, one cannot use the term "deluded" for such person.

Similarly, prArabdha is upAdhi. So, the perception of bhrama-vastu, namely the world, would continue till prArabdha is present. However, since the perceived world has been understood to be unreal like mirage, one can use the term mukti.

Thus, in case of sOpAdhika-bhrama, the usage of word "mukti" can be made even when avidyAlesha is present. This is what BhAshyakAra says -  त्वमपि तत्त्वदर्शिनां दृष्टिमाश्रित्य शोकं मोहं च हित्वा शीतोष्णादीनि नियतानियतरूपाणि द्वन्द्वानि ‘विकारोऽयमसन्नेव मरीचिजलवन्मिथ्यावभासते’ इति मनसि निश्चित्य तितिक्षस्व इत्यभिप्रायः ॥ 

The vision of knower of truth is this -- oh, this perceived world is absolutely non-existent. It just appears as an illusion like mirage-water.
 

 When you are still talking about pratibandhaka there is no meaning to mukti here…Please share what is your understanding of ‘mukti’ ?? 


As discussed above. Pratibandhaka to eradication of one shakti of avidyA. BhAshyakAra says - बाधितमपि तु मिथ्याज्ञानं द्विचन्द्रज्ञानवत्संस्कारवशात्कंचित्कालमनुवर्तत एव । 

Clearly it is said that mithyAjnAna continues for some time, even when it is sublated. This is what is avidyAlesha. Also,  प्रारब्धफलकर्मसंस्कारशेषानुवृत्त्या says the same. 

Mukti is jIvanmukti and videhamukti, in short. BhAshyakAra says -  यथा च वर्तमाना ब्रह्मविदः आरब्धभोगक्षये कैवल्यमनुभवन्ति — ‘तस्य तावदेव चिरं यावन्न विमोक्ष्येऽथ सम्पत्स्ये’ (छा. उ. ६ । १४ । २) इति श्रुतेः. This kaivalya, experienced after exhaustion of prArabdha, is called videha-mukti. The mukti, which is coupled with prArabdha, is called jIvanmukti.

 Again big big nomenclature to avidyA shakti!!  Which is ultimately concluded as Kalpita and adhyArOpita. 


Yes. avidyA-shakti of whatever sort is kalpita and adhyArOpita.

Anyway as I said above when you are talking about pratibaNdhaka you cannot talk about jeevamukti.  Very sanctity of ‘mukti’ pada will be lost when there is an iota of pratibandhaka / avidyAlesha. 


Not so. As is evident from day-to-day experience of sOpAdhika-bhrama as in case of mirage. This is VedAnta 101.

 Just find out in later vyAkhyAna-s it must have been said.  And in kleshApahAriNi this type of non-sense stand has been completely refuted by Sri SSS. 


I think one needs to retrain the reckless impudence arising out of abject ignorance. The attribution of "non-sense stand" is rooted in absence of application of cognitive faculties resulting into a fanatic adherence to fertile imaginary misconceptions.

Brahmaiva hi muktyAvasthA, na-cha brahmaNOnekAkArayOgOsti clarifies bhAshyakAra in sUtra bhAshya.  The difference you are talking about between sadyOmukta and jeevanmukta is quite untenable considering the fact that sashareeratvasya mithyAjnAnanimittatvAt. 


Sir, what do you think I mean by sadyOmukti and jIvanmukti? 

 By the way in SDV and ajAtavAda different types of mukti-s advocated by bhAshyakAra according to you???


In ajAtivAda, there is no concept of mukti or bondage. In SDV and DSV, the concept of mukti and bandhan is present. In SDV, jIvanmukti is accepted. In DSV, jIvanmukti is explained as arthavAda.

Regards.
Sudhanshu Shekhar.



 

SREENATH N

unread,
Dec 17, 2024, 4:09:13 AM12/17/24
to adva...@googlegroups.com
Hi,
I think a Jnani should be able to be in Jeevan Mukti state under every situation but still might need some effort. If sense of duty is present then this effort and time window may be large. I guess Brahma Jnanam doesn't mean an immediate right response under all situation. Its a potency in knowledge which when applied manifests the right way, by consuming time and effort. Or the settling time for this potency in the manifested domain will depend on the situation. Even Lord Krishna took time in addressing all situation and didn't avoid war all together. If its an Ajani the potency may not be primed enough to manifest the right way in a meaningful time and might carry worries till end of life. For a Guru with no material  bondage  like a family, it may be simpler as he just have to give meaningful interpretation of scriptures.(This also has its own value) But getting things working in a mundane life along with the outlook of a Jnani is going to be tougher in my opinion. In simpler terms nothing matters beyond a point could summarize this wisdom. But what is that "beyond" point and how elegant the journey was till that "beyond" point could be a real testimony for the Jnanam or its richness.

In this particular e.g. its actually motivating a reader that even after initiation of  Brahma Vidya ,a weak thought like thought of suicide might occur but one could still do right things if the potency is utilized the right way. In the case of Rama he showed the Right Governance through that potency in my opinion.

Rgds,
Sreenath

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "advaitin" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to advaitin+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit

Bhaskar YR

unread,
Dec 17, 2024, 5:29:16 AM12/17/24
to adva...@googlegroups.com

praNAms

Hare Krishna

 

  • Just sharing my thoughts on jnAni’s characteristics.  Whenever we talk about jnAni’s paramArtha jnAna we are not talking about his mere intellectual understanding of it like any other objective science knowledge.  It is his svarUpa jnAna which is trikAla abAdhita and through which he realized that he was / is / always be nitya, Shuddha, buddha, mukta paripUrNa svarUpa and he is neither kartru nor bhOktru at any point of time.  With this backdrop would like to share my thoughts: 

 

I think a Jnani should be able to be in Jeevan Mukti state under every situation but still might need some effort.

 

  • Effort means he is still under the influence of his dehAtma buddhi, identifying himself with his antaHkaraNa and not free from the feeling that he is the doer (kartru) enjoyer (bhOktru). 

 

If sense of duty is present then this effort and time window may be large.

 

  • Again sense of duty (kartavya) means he is, like any other ajnAni imprisoned in his own BMI ( upAdhi). 

 

I guess Brahma Jnanam doesn't mean an immediate right response under all situation.

 

  • But the phala of brahma jnAna is : bhidyate hrudagrantiH chidyante sarvasaMshayAH, ksheeyante chAsya karmANi tasmin drushte parAvare.  He ( the paramArtha jnAni) transcends all the situations and his drushti is called samyaK drushti or sama drushti.  (geeta -sthita prajna).

 

Its a potency in knowledge which when applied manifests the right way, by consuming time and effort.

 

  • I heard this type of statements somewhere, but effort and responses are time consuming in that whatever little time gap due to rush of blood he may like us commit any heinous act and might succumb to the karma baNdhana again…but Advaita says a paramArtha jnAni never ever gets any vipareeta pratyaya. 

 

Or the settling time for this potency in the manifested domain will depend on the situation.

 

  • Again his paramArtha jnAna will not be influenced by the situation that he is going to face during post period of jnAna.  Just to convey the jnAni’s status we can talk about his pre and post jnAna period but his realization would fetch him the nishchita jnAna that he was / is / never will be kartru nor bhOktru.  The very fruit of this type of paramArtha jnAna is sarvAnartha nivrutti, sarva purushArtha prApti. 

 

V Subrahmanian

unread,
Dec 17, 2024, 5:37:25 AM12/17/24
to adva...@googlegroups.com
Dear Sreenath ji,

What you say is the right thing.  In the Jivanmukti viveka of Sri Vidyaranya he addresses the problem deftly:  He says: even for a Jnani who has realized his Brahmanhood, the achievement of Jivanmukti is a challenge.  For the Swami, jivanmukti is characterized by vaasana kshaya and manonasha, with Jnanam given. So, in his view the concept of jivanmukti is something to be practiced with effort.  It could be stated to be a life-long effort and practice for the Jnani intending to be a jivanmukta. The benchmarks given in the Bh.Gita, Mahabharata,. etc. are all there to help the aspirant practice these qualities and achieve jivanmukti. Yet, they are not exhaustive. The Yoga Vasishtha is yet another text which abounds in the idea of jivanmukti. 

regards
subbu  

SREENATH N

unread,
Dec 17, 2024, 8:12:53 PM12/17/24
to adva...@googlegroups.com
Hari Om, 

Thank you Subbu ji . I havent undergone traditional studies. Just had Upanayanam and Sandhya Vandanam for sometime ( may be 7 years mostly regularly). Now i restrict it to Gayatri chanting and some slokas.My view was based on limited reading, good amount of analysis and my own life experiences. Once i was praying to Lord Krishna and said in my prayers, i really dont know the purity of my heart( how much pure it is) as there must be atleast an iota of selfishness in my prayers. After that prayer i got convinced that , effort is a must. I guess one of the namam in Vishnu Sahasranamam highlights the importance of effort aspect.

Once again thank you for confirming that some aspect of my view has some value. I really value the inputs from some one who is knowledgable in a traditional way.

Rgds,
Sreenath
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages