Honestly, The stuckness is: I am expecting a complete shift in consciousness and perspective. All my posts are what I believe and think at the moment. I'm waiting for the dirty glasses to fall off, to see the truth always, and not just get glimpses. I'm waiting for this to happen and my heart to fill with warm bliss and unconditional love and become one with everything and love everything and not just get tastes of it. Sounds selfish to me now that I read it. It is what it is.
On Dec 16, 4:47 pm, Rodger <rodge...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I just googled Ken Wilber,Richard.What I posted from was from,Always
> Already:The Brilliant Clarity of Ever-Present Awareness.
> Lot's of good (nondual) stuff out there.
> All the same stuff really.
> Stuff is stuff.Ya know?
>
> If you're not able to get there on your own from what I've given
> you,let me know.I'll see if I can guide you further.
>
After a while I found it. Thanks Rodger.
Nothing wrong with any of it, but on this forum, clarity is useful.
As long as we breath, we do this and that. Striving in order to
acheive some goal is fine. Meditating, self-investigation and so on
is fine. All of it is just fine, but to recognize that the ego/self-
constructed "I" is striving to construct some pre-conceived outcome
and get one up on the universe is self-investigation. How can one
stop the search? Who is there to stop? B.S. is what I offer, for
what it is worth.
One cannot avoid being one's true self,Bob.
One cannot move toward or away from true self.True self is that very
movement.
(Remember...'the thought process is the movement of consciousness'?)
Consciousness,Self,Spirit,God,Bozo,etc.,is all there is.Any movement
is of that,as that.
You are not not that.
To ask,'what is that?',is that asking.
To think,'I am not that',is that thinking that.
Really,that is all there is to that.
I am,you are,the world is.
Leave it at that,or not.
But,if not...you are that not leaving it at that.
That cannot be avoided.
I think you're on the right track,too.Only,I have to agree with
Gary...you can't think your way into not thinking...or,into
thinking.If you're thinking you can,you might want to rethink
that.And,rethinking,I think,is the key.At least to improving the
dream.
So,rather than rearranging the furniture one has become attached
to,one might consider some new stuff.After all,if the sofa you're
sitting on is uncomfortable in one corner,putting it in another
doesn't make it comfortable.What I mean is,if you keep thinking the
same stuff,you'll keep getting the same stuff.
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
On Dec 17, 5:47 am, Rodger <rodge...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> You're welcome,Richard.
> Have you enjoyed the reading?
Very much.
Here's another Ken Wilber quote I liked, from the same material:
"Nonetheless, traditionally, in order to demonstrate your sincerity,
you must complete a good number of preliminary practices, including a
mastery of various states of meditative consciousness, summating in a
stable post-postconventional adaptation, all of which is well and
good. But none of those states of consciousness are held to be final
or ultimate or privileged. And changing states is not the goal at all.
Rather, it is precisely by entering and leaving these various
meditative states that you begin to understand that none of them
constitute enlightenment. All of them have a beginning in time, and
thus none of them are the timeless. The point is to realize that
change of state is not the point, and that realization can occur in
any state of consciousness whatsoever."
The more things change the more they stay the same,wouldn't you say?
Do you like David Carse? I was reading from him earlier this
a.m...."Pure Awareness in which everything arises is what you already
are:how can it possibly be found?"
On Dec 17, 1:11 pm, Rodger <rodge...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "All states have a beginning in time,which has it's beginning in
> consciousness.
>
> The more things change the more they stay the same,wouldn't you say?
Only in time. "The point is to realize that change of state is not the
point..." So I wouldn't say. Besides, you say it enough for the both
of us and the population of a small nation as well. :-)
> Do you like David Carse? I was reading from him earlier this
> a.m...."Pure Awareness in which everything arises is what you already
> are:how can it possibly be found?"
It's all good. Carse was NoVa's main man, if I recall rightly, and I
probably do. What I would add to his quote (not that he or anyone
asked me) is the arising is also Pure Awareness. Otherwise one posits
the duality of container and what it contains. There's a lot of
variations of that concept going around these days; I tell you what.
Words:I tell you what.
The point is to realize that nothing begins in time,or in
Consciousness,or in Pure Awareness.Otherwise...
That things begin within posits the duality that things end
without,and nothing begins or ends without the Pure Awareness,or
Consciousness or whatever that already is,and is AS it is.So,not
within but never without,you might say.
And,the more things change the more things stay the same,or are never
without what they really are.
Let us not mistake the driver for the vehicle. You are not your body.
Are you my body?
> > > variations of that concept going around these days; I tell you what.- Hide quoted text -
Let us not remove the driver from the vehicle.
Let us recognize the vehicle as the driven driver.
Where is Richard?
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
On Dec 27, 4:09 am, godszen <gods...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> :-)
Nothing is as it seems....nor is it otherwise.
Happy Consensus Reality to you too!
> > > Nothing is as it seems....nor is it otherwise.- Hide quoted text -