I just came accross a very nice tutorial for creating a watercolor flower. And since it's Summer for many of our readers, I thought it appropriate to post the link :
<http://www.myjanee.com/tuts/painted2/painted2.htm>
Ray
P.S. For those living where Winter is arriving... work on last year pictures :)
And Ray - one of my roses is just trying to put out a bud....(and I haven't even got around to pruning them yet!!)
Susan S
Ray
Ray
:-)
Chuck
Susan : I'm on the laptop and, unfortunately, I don't have my english-french dictionnary ("put out a bud" and "pruning", I can't tell what's that meaning). For all I know, a Bud is a kind of beer :) I'll look tomorrow morning.
Ray
"put out a bud" - burgeon? (maybe? - that seems to come into my mind from distant French lessons!) - a rose bud is an immature rose flower, and they have just started to appear, despite the fact that it is mid-winter.
Susan S.
But, in the meantime, it's very kind of you to translate. Tell me, what's the weather in Winter where you live ? We have an average of -15C (with peaks of -27C and we receive 1.80 meters of snow, an average again).
Ray
Ray
Susan S
But: why trying to imitate other forms of art from photography, except for experimentation purposes? To produce watercolours you need paper, brushes, water and dyes.
IMHO, working in Photoshop is an artform in itself that doesnot need to imitate other techniques.
Or am I missing something?
Leen
EDIT After all, in the pre-photoshop world, I remember art directors getting paid big bucks to sit there and use pantographs and such to make line drawings out of photos, and it took ages to do it, too.
Let me answer your question by asking another question. There are artists
that produce photorealistic drawings by hand. Why would they want to
imitate a photograph? Shouldn't they just use a camera?
My comment is why should it matter! An artist communicates through choice
of media, subject, emphasis, technique, color and lighting.
There are ongoing debates as to whether photography is art (I feel it is)
and whether "photo art" is a valid artistic expression (I feel this is
also). I don't intend to carry on such a debate here.
To my way of thinking, a painterly rendition of a photographic subject is
just as valid an artistic statement as one rendered using classical
techniques and media.
No one who has ever seen a well done watercolor will confuse that with the
results of the "watercolor" photoshop techniques. But, the resultant look
and feel from the photoshop technique may have exactly what we want to
communicate our message and/or feelings. We're not creating a watercolor
with photoshop, we're creating a mood and expressing an emotion.
Bob
Besides, when I look at a piece of art, I rarely ask myself how it was done, on what canvas, etc. I consider the art piece for the message and I see it in its whole.
Granted, Photohop Elements may not be the best software to do painting. But, for applying paint (or paint effect) on a photo, I think it's a very good choice!
Ray
I reject plastic flowers in a vase, I don't like like electric fake fire in the fireplace and I don't believe a Big Mac is a decent meal...;-))
How about an imitation watercolour? I don't know. Just wondering.
Leen
Certain form of Art are to be "digested" on the spot. Others require a more
slowly approach, one that requires the viewer to think back, sometimes
within himself or herself. The best work is one that goes deep inside me
and makes me realize what I am or what the Artist is. Many times, I've seen
this on The Challenge pages.
Now, to say that an imitation watercolor flower is different from that, I
don't think so. It may be viewed as an "instant Art form", granted. But
yet, the person that did it put a little (and sometimes a lot) of himself in
it. Picking up the picture, choosing the color, selecting the filters, etc.
Those are only tools to express a message. If you look at my drawings of
the boats, for this week, I used oil painting with Photoshop Elements. It's
a rendition, a fake if you like. What does that tell you about me?
My conclusion is that whatever the materials, the techniques, the tools,
every work done is still a form of Art. That it is done with finger
painting, on a LCD monitor, or with chalk on a wall, it's no different.
Ray
P.S. I don't reject your views neither, I'm only expressing mine :)
:-)
Chuck
Ray
Music, another thing that the whole family does well, I stink at it, but I can sit down at the old piano and make some music that sounds OK to ME(and the dog).
That's what my retirement is all about, if we enjoy our own primative art, and have a good time doing it, and do a Challenge once in a while, keep going and have a good time. I call it FUN!
Jane
Leen
Having never considered myself, or been considered, an artist, I have found that sharing my 'doodlings' on the Challenge has given me more pleasure than I could ever have imagined. The praise and comments that come from all in the forum spur me on to try even harder to produce as good if not better entry the next time.
Sometimes I look at the Challenge picture and no matter what I do, I cannot visualise anything to do with it, other times an idea immediately comes to mind. Then I have to try to recreate on the screen what I see in my head, which is why I call it doodling. I have tried, but on my best efforts I cannot re-create exactly what I have done.
As for the burger debate, there is no other way I know of getting my recommended daily/monthly/yearly allowance of plastic'ky cheese, saturated fat, hollow fries and rubber bread with a bird seed coating, than from a Big Mac.
So I don't ;) (sorry Chuck, but you have got to try one over here, it WILL put you off for life)
Paul
The tools available are just that; tools. You will never see 2 identical images from 2 seperate Artists who use the exact same tools. It is what you do with them that makes us individual creators. It is totally subjective. I hope to be able to create whatever I want without being judged on the process in which i created it. If it looks good...so what ??
Oh Whoppers are way better...flame broiled !!!
Ray
Alas, all the technical knowledge and tools in the world can't give you an artist's eye or heart if it wasn't there to begin with. I know that's surely true for me. Sigh.
Dave
"Jodi Frye If it looks good...so what ??
I will also agree with the following. (As long as it is not more than one
every few weeks).
Pete
> Oh Whoppers are way better...flame broiled !!!
But I guess I would eat just about anything as long as it looked (& smelled)
good.
Pete
when are we going to do lunch ??
When would you like? (I told everyone that we had lunch together every
day...now they know that was not true:(
Pete
> That myth certainly continues in these parts as well. There doesn't
> seem to be any such rumour though with East Indian cooking and at
> $6.95 for all you can eat, it still beats Mickey D's in my opinion.
> Besides, with typical North American style food we now have to be very
> careful with Mad Cow dissease and things such as Scrapes. The fish is
> contaminated with Mercury and the Veggies are being exploited with
> chemicals and fertilizers to enhance their growth. It's a sad world at
> times.
dave
Many years ago now, when I was growing up in Toronto, my landlord ( who
was old school Hungarian ) and I were discussing food. He had asked me
what I liked to eat and I had replied that I really liked shrimp but
found them very expensive. He said, do you eat them all or do you throw
some in the garbage. I replied that I never threw any out. He said the
only time food is expensive, is when you waste it or throw it out
because it has gone bad. I have remembered this to this day and so tend
to buy the types of foods I like regardless of cost. I still enjoy
getting good value for my dollar and hence my statement about rather
having a good varied buffet meal for $6.95 than a burger from a fast
food outlet. I have travelled in some pretty poor regions and highly
value our lifestyle and what it provides to us. I was raised at home to
only take what I felt I could reasonably eat and not to leave anything
on my plate.
To keep this on topic. Let me say that I enjoy Photoshop and Photoshop
Elements almost as much as I do a good buffet. They provide me with
quite a varied smorgasbord.
Dave
--
news://news.annexcafe.com/Annexcafe.Digital.Painting
Catlady Moderator
:-)
Chuck