The file I am working on is 238 pages long, and is 165m in size. Most pages contain 10 pictures, in *.tif format.
I was concerned about the file size, so I divided up this document into the letters of the alphabet, i.e., the "A" sections now go into the "A" document, etc. I set up these new files into a book, which includes the TOC, A-Z files, and the Index.
The total document size of this project is now 1.5 GIG! I didn't add any pages or graphics when I divided it into separate files... so I don't get it. Plus, the individual files are rather large. For instance, "C" is 11 pages long, and the file size is 155megs.
I thought dividing up the file into separate files and into a book would make this more efficient. Should I have left it as one document instead? Would a single document that is 165m (and will be growing as new pages are entered) still be stable, or is it getting close to the filesize cap and may get corrupted?
I know hitting File > Save As helps keep the file size down, but any other tips to keep this project from exploding?
The downside is that you add a certain amount of file overhead for each file, but it should be on the order of less than 1mb, unless you have the file loaded with dozens of swatches and styles, which take up space.
If that's the case, delete unused styles and swatches, do another save as, and see if that helps.
Are you using version cue to save versions? That will eat a lot of space in a hurry, too.
-John O
it is not making any difference
robin
stupid question ... do you have new files on each page - or you have the
same 10 files placed on MasterPage ??
what with transparency ??
how looks your TIF file ?? like gray photo with landscape or all white
with one black point ?? ;) do you use LZW/ZIP compression in your TIFs
?? what PPI(DPI) ??
save your TIF without compression - and then check it's real size ;)
robin
All kidding aside, though, is that number right? It sounds more like the size of the .indb book file alone. I don't know how you could get more than twenty files (I'm presuming you have a file for nearly every letter in the alphabet) --even without links-- to have an aggregate size that small.
If you're concerned about compressing tiffs with LZW in Photoshop, don't be.
LZW is lossless compression, and no detail is lost whatsoever..unlike jpeg,
where your concerns are valid. With grayscale tiffs, the compression can be
4 or 5 to 1, or higher. :-)
-John O