>Would Classroom in a Book help me with these different actions?<<
Yes, it would. You can also go to Adobe's Expert Center where there are a bunch of tutorials. You can get an idea of how the AI tools work.
>I still do not know how to change a raster to a vector.<<
You can't. The only way to do this is either with Streamline or trace the shapes with the pen tool.
>I have Photoshop 4...could I use that program?<<
Kinda hard to say without seeing the image. It might be possible. You can't change a raster image into vector objects, but you might be able to select the shapes and turn the selection into paths.
Hope this makes sense.
I would imagine the Auto Trace option would work for vector objects only.
Ann, Ed,
the Autotrace tool works with and is made for working with bitmaps. You have to click with the tool a couple of pixels outside a one-color area on the bitmap. The trace parameters are set in the Type and Autotracing under Edit>Preferences menu.
It works pretty well if the image is clean and color areas are well defined (you may want to posterize the image in Photoshop by going to Image>Adjust>Posterize, it will reduce colors in the image). The only "bad" thing is that you have to trace the color areas one by one.
It sounds like your shopping for something to do this. You might try algolab.com or just search for "raster to vector conversion," there's some shareware out there too.
I'm not a fan of the auto trace tool, for a quick and dirty tool I use Macromedia Flash. Yup, you can covert to raster in there and cut and paste to illustrator.
This is kind of getting off the topic of raster-to-vector conversion, but for tesselations and textile patterns, you might want to try this trick using the Transform live effect. It lets you interactively experiment with pattern tilings without having to manually do the copy-dragging.
Decide on the size that you want your repetition to be.
Draw one copy of your main design, sort of near the upper left of your page. Group it. (Even if it is just one object.)
Go to Effects>Distort & Transform>Transform, and enter the width of your pattern tile in the Horizontal Move box. Enter at least 2 in the Copies box (I prefer 3.) Press OK.
(Optional: If you want to make a symmetric design, you can insert a Reflect Transform effect before the step where you make the horizontal copies, entering Copies as 1.)
Now bring up the same dialog box from the menu again, and apply another Transform effect, this time with the Vertical Move distance being minus the size of your design, and again entering at least 2 in the Copies box. (Optional: If you want alternating rows to be staggered, like a brick tiling, enter half your horizontal tile size in the Horizontal Move distance in the same transform where you enter the Vertical Move distance, and set Copies to just 1. Then repeat with a second Vertical shift, this time entering the Vertical Move distance as twice the row height, and no horizontal shift.)
You will now have one editable copy of your design, but it will display several copies across and down. Whenever you edit one copy, the others will update automatically.
This method is very convenient for seeing how your pattern will tile before you actually define it. In the "old fashioned" way of designing patterns where the design overlaps the tile edges, you had to manually make sure that you did the exact same edit to each side, generally by deleting the old copy at one side and repeating the shift-drag.
Since the Transform effect puts each successive copy behind the others, if you want the stacking to go the other direction you can instead start with your main design at the right and enter negative horizontal shifts, or at the bottom and enter positive vertical shifts.
At this point you can save your combination of Transforms as a style, by clicking the New Style button in the Styles palette. The Style will apply only the shifted duplications. (Since it has no paint, it will have an invisible thumbnail, so you may want to give it a name like "1 in x 2 in pattern tiling" and display your Styles palette in name view.)
If most of the elements are stacking the way you want, but a few aren't, try dragging those elements from the top to the bottom or from the left to the right, or vice versa. This will keep the same stacking order relative to the objects in the selectable copy, but reverse the stacking order relative to the duplicates that are coming in from the Transform effect.
If you decide you want to alter your tile dimensions, open up the Appearance palette and double-click on the Transform effect, and change the Move distances. (Don't click on the Effect menu again; that adds a new Transform effect, it doesn't alter the options of the existing ones.)
When you've got everything stitching the way you want it to, option-click the Rectangle tool, and make a rectangle the size of the pattern tile. (If you did one of the brick tilings, it will need to be twice the height of a single row to include both the shifted version and an unshifted version.) It doesn't really matter where this rectangle is located, as long as it covers one copy of everything. I usually put it near the center, then drag it around to minimize the number of objects that get cropped by it. Send to Back, and make it no-fill. (You may want to keep a thin stroke on it temporarily, just for visibility.)
Select your grouped design, and do an Expand Appearance. (Before doing this, you may want to make a copy on another layer and lock it, so that you will have the uncropped design available for later editing.)
With either the arrow-plus tool or the lasso tool, marquee-drag or lasso a selection big enough to contain all the objects that extend into the background tile. Select>Inverse, to select everything that doesn't extend into the pattern tile, then Delete.
Now remove the stroke from your background rectangle, if you didn't already. Select the background rectangle and everything in it, and define your pattern.
If you are interested I can email you a .ai file with a sample style already set up for this, applied to a pattern design of overlapping leaves.
shouldn't the initial object (after it is grouped) be targeted? If the group wasn't targeted, the effect would be applied to all of the objects in the group rather than to the group itself, wouldn't it?
Are you still using AI 9? In AI 10, when you do a Group command, the group automatically gets targetted.
oops :) Yes, I am. If I even hint my boss about buying something, she'll just laugh at me. As things are in Venezuela, everyone is happy just to have something... :(
I didn't know about this (useful!) feature of AI10. Thanks a lot!
No, scanned images do not become vector when you place them into Illustrator. There are some autotracing tools, but they depend on having clean image art with flat color areas, and most people prefer to just draw the paths themselves with the pen tool because it makes much nicer outlines.
If you plan to use Illustrator for vectorizing images, would recommend reading the Help about "template layers" (a better name would be image tracing layers) and "Auto Trace Tool".
Another method which some people use with success is to turn selections into paths in Photoshop, and then export those paths to Illustrator. There are online tutorials describing how to do that. I don't offhand have the URL, but you could google on "Photoshop Illustrator tutorial" and get tutorials that mentioned both products.