The scanner, A Fujitsu Expression 1680 is functional when used from the "Control Panel-Imaging Devices" interface.
Hi,
I have the same problem with the FUJITSU M4097Ddm scanner. When trying
to create PDF from scanner in Acrobat 6.0, scanning is performed but
when trying to open the document in Acrobat , the error "Unknown
system error in call to StartScan." occurs.
Otherwise scanner works correctly with other applications on this
Win2000 platform.
I found the workaround solution and installed Acrobat PDFWriter v.4.0,
so I can scan the document, save it as a TIFF and later send this TIFF
to print on PDFWriter, which would create the PDF document. But this
is a 3-step process, I would really like to be able to scan it
directly into PDF, what Acrobat 6.0 is suppose to do.
Thank you so much...
Shone
WhenI try to scan a document into PDF using Acrobat 6.0 Upgrade, and using the Microtek ScanMaker V6UPL scanner with ScanWizard software, ver. 5.12 under windows XP Home, the Settings screen locks on RGB colors and will not permit me to select another setting. I can scan an "Overview" but the final scan will not work. Error message displayed is, "Operation stopped because of an unrecognized image format." I CAN scan a document using my Lexmark X125 scanner and allsettings are available. What is the fix?
Thanks.
(It looks like there may be a number of incompatibilites with various scanners.)
Have you tried scanning at a different dpi or color settings (for example, color instead of black and white)?
Thanks
Thanks
I'm glad I read this thread b4 buying 6.0. I use Acrobat 5 to scan EVERY day. I would have looked way stupid at work if I'd upgraded to 6!
Sorry this doesn't help you guys, but I'm bookmarking this thread, and I'm not gonna recommend any nove from 5.0 until this issue is resolved.
regards
Ian M
Steps to reproduce:
1 - Launch Acrobat 6.0
2 - Choose File/Create PDF/From Scanner
3 - Select the scanner "WIA- HP Officejet 7100 scanner"
Results:
"Error while interacting with the scanner: the selected scanner wasn't found."
This is a fairly new scanner sold at Costco so my guess is that Acrobat QA didn't get to test against this scanner, and HP didn't get to test this release of Acrobat 6.
When this gets addressed I hope the "Scan to" button on the HP 7130xi will actually list Acrobat 6, instead of just MS office apps and HP utilities.
1) Acrobat Pro 6.0
2) HP 6200 USB scanner
3) HP precision scan pro 1.0 software
4) Win XP Pro SP-1
Hangs every time, worked with Acrobat 5.0! Please, Adobe, give us a fix!
1.Make sure you've installed the twain 9.10.25 driver from the FCPA website.
2. after installing the driver and rebooting, test the application with the scandall 21 application that came with your scanner.
3. If everything runs fine through scandall 21 ,try scanning to PDF with that application.
a) go to scan | select source
b) select your scanning source
c) go to scan | to Adobe PDF
This is definitely a problem with Acrobat 6.0 and a major one at that.
XP PRO SP1
Acrobat 6 Pro
HP Precision Scan Pro 2.1
HP Scanjet 6350C on USB Port
Works OK.
I would strongly suggest that you upgrade to the latest driver levels.
Acrobat 6 and Pagemaker 7 don't seem to work well together either, but thats another story...
I HOPE ADOBE ACTIVALLY MONITORS THE MESSAGES AND STARTS THINKING OF THE CUSTOMER!!
Big disappointment. Time to uninstall...
Tilman
Who needs testing anyway?
There's NO WAY I'm going to recommend my Company even look at 6.0. 5.0 works for us, and most document supply companies in the UK Rail Industry still use 4.05 on their CDs
One VERY DISASSIFIED customer
"Their support is the worst I ever required. They have given up and actually told me there is no solution...."
what you probably heard was that there is no setting in acrobat 6 nor is there an installation choice which will allow you to scan into acrobat at this time. (that is quite apart from telling you there is no solution. There is a solution of course: scan into your operating system. You can do THAT, can't you?)
I, too, initially had no success scanning into acrobat 6 via my hp scanjet 3570c but eventually opening my scan software AND being prompted to reinstall it I was able to scan into the 'Bat.
Look for this to be resolved through some sort of dot release. Adobe usually makes amends. You wouldnt be here complaining if they hadn't been responsible in the past.
FYI - I have the same scanner and get the same message - just a day
ago Adobe played dumb - the suggested workaround was to reload 5.0
just for the purpose of scanning and then open in my 6.0 Pro to take
advantage of the expanded features - it works, but what a pain - isn't
the 4120C a gas - changed my business.
--There is a solution of course: scan into your operating system. You can do THAT, can't you?-- - why should we, my 'good man'? Acrobat 6 has had a price hike, so I and my customers would rather like to have the same facilities as the previous, cheaper version, 'old chap'.
And the product is unlikely to improve whilst apologists for it simply tell users to 'make do' rather than stress the need for Adobe to come up with a solution to what appears to be a genuine, widespread problem with the .0 release. 'Old Bean'.
My 1st question is for fujitsu scanner owners: Has anyone been able to get any program including scandall 21 to recognize the wiatwain.ds (WIN XP driver)source? It's not probable, but maybe Acrobat 6 could use that driver.
My 2nd question is: What scanners do work with Acrobat 6? I guess if you have one of those scanners, you are not reading this forum, though.
I then went to eht Acrobat knoweldgebase and did a search of startscan. I got 785 hits. I looked at several and none of them had a reference to startscan. I then did a search on xxxxxx and got 785 hits. Garbage! I then clicked on the link where it offered to allow me to provide comments on the web site. I was told I would be provided a form within 24 hours that could be used to provide comments. I can't believe it!
I reinstalled Acrobat 5 and everything worked again. So I too am looking for a solution to this problem. I wanted to post to let everyone know that a Kodak scanner also has this problem and so it seems clear it is "Acrobat-centric" rather than hardware or driver oriented.
Tim Blair
US FDA
I've raised the issue of the appalling quality of the Adobe KB before - it is quite obvious that they bin any questionnaire they receive on the subject of the KB as they certainly haven't responded with positive changes. Try the KBs at www.microsoft.com or www.symantec.com to see how good they can be.
When you look at these three simple facts: a) Adobe have made no progress in improving the KB, despite widespread dissatisfaction (as you have pointed out, the Search engine must be inherently faulty); b) Adobe have made no progress in improving the quality of their Tech Support - just look at the comments by users in this and other forums; c) there has been no official word on this Scan problem in Acrobat 6, despite it obviously not being a figment of users' imaginations
... it is clear that Adobe management (or at the very least, their communication ability) is defective.
Their announcement of new 'Paid For' Expert Support beggars belief - I'm sure that the guys/gals on the dev teams that build Acrobat, Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign etc. all know their stuff - but move 3 yards away from there and the rest of Adobe Inc. plainly live in total ignorance.
I use an AGFA Duoscan T1200 with the latest drivers and interface, it will scan, but only at 300dpi or less. There is only a grayscale option available and then the scan is actually done as a line scan.
Really weird. Considering the number of 'Adobe Partners' that have expertise in the area of scanning, you would have thought that this would have been a no-brainer.
This is definetely an Adobe Acrobat bug.
Results:
"Error while interacting with the scanner: the selected scanner wasn't found."
Per HP, I have updated my bios, and chipset, and tried a half a dozen of other things, still cannot scan through acrobat.
Mike Trevelino
"We believe we have found the source of the problem, but we do not have a fix for it at this time."
"The fi-4120C and fi-4220C are sending compressed CCITT G4 images from the scanner when in B/W mode, and the images are inverted between black and white. The Paper Capture Plug-In is having problems processing G4 data coming directly from the scanner. Is there any way to configure the scanners to send uncompressed B/W data?"
Seems like a perfectly acceptible problem. Now why can't Adobe just tell us this? It might be possible for some folks to configure their TWAIN modules to send uncompressed data. At least people can try out this fix and give Adobe some feedback. It looks like new TWAIN drivers are in the works from the Fujitsu end for all Fujitsu scanner owners.
I select Creat PDF from scanner, Acrobat lets me select the scanner, then I see the box on the task box for the scanner appear. However the window for the scanner does not open. The windows Task Manager indicates Adobe, the scanner and ADOBE:ADAM:TWAIN:DSM:THREAD are running. But Acrobat is frozen and no scanner Window. This is a product problem. I have not been home during their business hours. But I will call next week, I hope they do ot give me a story... the product will go back. Version 5 works!!!
They should provide a remedy for this problem. Before they produce another PDF commercial.
But now every time I scan a document, the scanner stop at 52% and the pdf page display at half page. But I have no probelm using the scanner for other programs. It scanned full page.
I have done a detect & repair but still having the same problem. I also did not done any setting to Acrobat 6 setting.
Communications within one product development group seems excellent - i.e. a product like Photoshop or Acrobat seems to get more polished with each release and I guess for this to happen the guys and gals doing the dev work must 'get on' with each other.
But general communication between departments (and, obviously between those departments and the outside world) seems to be haphazard, if not non existent.
I get the impression that Adobe is a collection of individuals (if not cliques) working against each other rather than for the company as a whole. Fortunately some of those individuals are people of high caliber, but equally they never seem to make it to management positions.
And I'm sure the only reason that Adobe makes it so frequently to the 'Loveliest Company to Work For' awards is because they appear to have a policy of never firing anyone, no matter how useless (they just get shifted to another department - same havoc, different location :O)
How else to explain that it takes 2 months to admit to an obvious fault in a product, and then only in a brief forum message, in one thread and with no apology?
As more and more people realise that it doesn't take an Adobe product to create/edit a PDF, that the Adobe products have just had an unwarranted price hike and that there is effectively no mid price, low/medium volume product in their range... I suspect their impressive run with Acrobat is about to come to a halt.
Acrobat Pro is great, but not what the majority of office users want. And Elements is too weak, and starts at too high a volume level. And Standard is just plain irritating for the features it leaves out (at a higher price). If the Acrobat marketing had really 'communicated' with the users, they would have found that out - it's what our customers are telling us.
Time will tell, I guess.
Jasper.
>How else to explain that it takes 2 months to admit to an obvious fault
in a product, and then only in a brief forum message, in one thread and
with no apology?
You are aware that these are *user-to-user* forums, aren't you?
I get the impression that Adobe is a collection of individuals (if not
cliques) working against each other rather than for the company as a whole.
Fortunately some of those individuals are people of high caliber, but
equally they never seem to make it to management positions.<
I worked in a very large corporation and found the same phenomenom. It is the nature of large organizations to compartment themselves for optimum performance of their subsidiary groups thus produceing at time suboptimal results. Adobe is definitely a large organization.
Hurray! After almost two months the Adobe oracle speaks. It shouldn't
take two months and 65 complaints to get a response. As a large shareholder
of Adobe stock and loyal customer, we all deserve better treatment.<
Did you ever consider that it took some time to analyze the problem and set up a process to work with all the scanner manufacturer to resolve the problem? It is a shame in this age of instant gratification that when one does not get an instantaneous answer to one's problem, that something must be wrong and the developing organization must not be responding.
IMHO, maybe it's time we give Adobe a chance to come up with an answer and stop using this forum to repeat the same problem occurrence over and over again.
Ken Friedman
This is Stu Dern at Konica. I have just received a new network scanner driver version 1.11 from Konica Japan. This new driver is only available at this time as beta and the scheduled release date is August 2003. I have confirmed proper functionality with the newly released Acrobat 6.0. If you require this revised network twain driver, please contact Konica's hotline and request the new twain driver. Please note that this new twain driver is compatible only with Konica products.
-- It is the nature of large organizations to compartment themselves for optimum performance of their subsidiary groups thus produceing at time suboptimal results.-- I'm afraid that is just a defeatist view, Ken, and an inaccurate generalisation. (I wonder if you actually raised your head above the parapet in your 'large organisation' to point out the problems or just shrugged your shoulders there too.)
Microsoft is a case in point - part of me dislikes their scale and aggressive sales techniques. Yet in many cases they are quick to reveal/explain problems when they occur. Take a look at their KB which is littered with: 'MS acknowledge that this is a problem with Product X and it will be resolved in the next Service Pack'. I'd be happy if Adobe could come up with the same admission and promise.
Their KB itself, and the free availability of self-tuition articles, puts Adobe's offering to shame. And - more importantly - they almost inundate users with requests for feedback. They scew up like all software producers who are racing to innovate, but their internal communication is such that they can and do turn round the ship before it hits the iceberg.
-- Did you ever consider that it took some time to analyze the problem and set up a process to work with all the scanner manufacturer to resolve the problem? -- did you ever consider that you've paid a large amount of money for a product that has been over a year in development and still doesn't work properly? Did it ever occur to you that acting as an apologist for a billion dollar organisation sounds a bit like pragmatic siding with the playground bully?
-- instant gratification that when one does not get an instantaneous answer to one's problem -- yeah, right, like 6 weeks+ is 'instantaneous'. Your business obviously doesn't depend on working Adobe software.
-- stop using this forum to repeat the same problem occurrence over and over again -- as has been pointed out, it took 65 messages to get an admission (and not even an apology). If they had admitted to a potential problem after say, 10 posts, then people would have had no need to repeat themselves. And actually I rather think that a lot of them were single posts.
It looks like this product wasn't tested properly - end of story.
I'd suggest looking at this page:
<http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/contact.html>
It has fax numbers and addresses for Adobe offices. If you want to make sure your complaint is at least seen by those who are ultimately responsible, use this route.
This page has some names you might want to write to:
<http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/pressroom/executivebios/main.html>
Believe me, a couple of hundred faxes and letters using this route will make things go a lot faster...
On time, on budget, don't work .....
Unfortunately we are obliged to get the latest releases of Adobe stuff, to prepare ourselves in advance for when the rest of the punters start buying it. But if I was a standard office user/IT buyer, I wouldn't place an order for ANY software until it had been out at least 3-6 months.
If they make a few errors in the software, then quickly research and own up to them, and work like mad on a fix - what's the big deal? I know that a fair number of people ranting and raving about bugs here wouldn't be too keen to have the quality, quantity or accuracy of their own work scrutinised, even if they demand perfection of software companies.
The problem is when companies like Adobe let bugs slip through then bury their head in the sand (or blame the users).
A major error like the Scan problem does look like something which ought to have been caught on testing. And the number of odd installation errors that people mention seem a little alarming.
I noticed that the Execs made the rather fanciful assertion that the release of 6.0 just prior to the end of the financial quarter boosted revenues significantly - it does kind of make you wonder if the product was released earlier than the developers actually wanted just to keep the money men and women happy...
If 80 other people would complain to the CEO, the problem would move up in priority.
I searched for adbe, the stock symbol. Investor relations(408-536-4416) Ask for the number to the CEO office (customer service department) or ask them to transfer. I think hey transfered me. Then tell them the story - The CEO's office will look into it.
EXACTLY! - too many people here seem to expect that simply sounding off in the forum is going to get things done. How??? - as we are continually told, this is a User To User forum. Adobe Execs (if they even know of its existence) probably consider it to be like a kid's playpen - the users scream and shout like mad, but ultimately they can't get anywhere so they can just sit back and relax, beer in hand.
I urge every user to take this route - if their problem is as severe as they say, the 10 minutes it will take is time well spent.
Another user still waiting for support.
Over the past couple of years, I've come to the conclusion that whichever Exec(s) are responsible for Customer Support provision, they are incompetent and need to be replaced. The problems are not intermittent, but endemic to the system and the whole of it needs to be restructured, top to bottom. (and a working Knowledge Base might be a start..)
An analysis of Adobe management practice in general would make fascinating reading - despite some signficant strides recently, I get the impression that - still - the main criteria for advancement in Adobe is not What you know but rather Who you know or How long you've been employed.
I actually feel sorry for the support staff, as they have no way of helping customers when they call on this issue.
Tech support to Project Manager:
"I've got loads of users out there with scanning problems in Acrobat 6.0"
Project Manager:
"Not my problem, I'm working on a new project now, and Acrobat 6.0 was delivered on time, and on budget"
Conversation ends .....
Also testing is the first thing to be cut when a project overruns (another necessary evil)
For that reason, I always try to mail/fax management on big issues at least - extra pay should mean extra responsibility in my book, and I don't see why Joe or Joanna Support should have to deal with crap which results from defective management.
Economising on Support offering is very short sighted - a content rich, easy to navigate KB (such as those of Microsoft, or Symantec) means that many users can sort out their own problems themselves.
The Adobe KB is actually SO poor - try doing a few experimental searches - that I'd be inclined to look closely at the relationship between the supplier and the Adobe exec who signed off the order for it...
I was told the same thing about the 30 days. I will now give them 30 days until my credit card is refunded. Then I goto my State's Attorney General. File a complaint and explain that the product is defective and should not have been released. At least 70 other people have the same problem. After reading the posts on this forum:Conclusion- Adobe 6 has problems and interferes with other applications. I will settle with Version 5, it works.
I have not tried scanning outside Paperport yet.
I agree that it is Adobe's issue to correct the mistakes. I am a Canon user teh scanner scans properly in all programs except Adobe Acrobat. Why would Canon repair their drivers for only one program whan all other programs work properly. One woud think a driver rewrite or correction could possibly create additional problems with other programs for them (Canon)
I use:
WinXP Professional SP1
Acrobat 6.0 Standard (upgraded from 5.05)
HP LaserJet 1220se with Auto Document Feeder
I had no problem scanning when using Acrobat 5.05 and Win2000 Prof.
At the very least they should have said 'there have been some reports blah blah and we are currently investigating blah blah'
Adobe are burying their head in the sand over this one, which is indicative of the communication with(in) the company as a whole I'm afraid.
p.s. the announcement of their XML Form product which is not even due out until spring 2004 smacks of desperation to me...