Now You See Me Extended Cut Differences

[Violette Ransone]

Theextended positioning assemblies will publish based on a specified simplified representation name. The main disadvantage over positioning assemblies is that it still downloads the dependencies to the publish workspace. Hence publish times may take longer than for positioning assemblies.

thanks for the link, it helps a bit. I found this page a bit of a challenge to fully understand however. See attached diagram which represents my interpretation of this information in a more digestable format. Confirmation appreciated.

Is it therefore true to say for extended positioning assemblies the CAD worker will only download models which are affected by the assembly features? So If I have a 1000 part assembly to publish, and only one of the lowest level assemblies with just 2 parts has a feature cut, then only this one low level assembly (With it's 2 parts) will be downloaded when publishing the the MA?

But if a feature cut appears in the top level assembly, all 1000 parts will need to be downloaded to publish as extended positioning assembly. In this instance it would therefore take roughly the same amount of time to publish as a standard job? Or is the system smart enough to know which of the 1000 parts are affected by the assembly cut, and just download those with affected geomoetry?

I did the usual searches. There is not so much related explicitly to extended positioning assemblies, specifically the pros/cons of using them. I think I've got my head around standard positioning assemblies already.

To be honest I'm still struggling a bit (and my colleagues) to confidently define our publishing stratergy for Creo. The documentation helps me configure once I know what we should be doing, but it's not helping much to make the strategic decisions. I'm not a CAD guru, so maybe these knowledge gaps are holding me back.

There were multiple presentations on this topic last year at PTC Live Global, and several more this year. (Last year's presentations are available on the PTC User website. This year's are currently only available to those who attended.)

Basically, a positioning assembly will only load the top level assembly file on the publisher. It will NOT download or open any of the dependents (parts or assemblies). This makes publishing very fast. For extended positioning assemblies, the entire assembly and all related parts need to be downloaded and physically opened on the publisher, so the load time advantage is lost, but the file(s) produced are still much less than what would be produced if positioning assemblies weren't used at all.

3. If positioning assemblies are used with "Latest" configuration specification does that mean that when you look at the representation of an older iteration you will see the structure of the old assembly but the latest representation of the components? Does this mean that non latest representations serve no purpose if you use latest as the configuration specification?

Thank you for the additional information and the list of unanswered questions. I'm following up with Development and the Product/Segment owners to get information we can use to enhance the documentation and to answer the questions that Martin posed. If those on this thread have additional suggestions about what should be covered in the doc, please let me know.

Some updates on this topic....am still researching questions 1 & 2, which are somewhat related and are not identifiable from the current documentation or online articles. To some degree the responses will be use case specific and needs some thinking through in terms of what will publish, what won't and/or why.

3. If positioning assemblies are used with "Latest" configuration specification does that mean that when you look at the representation of an older iteration you will see the structure of the old assembly but the latest representation of the components?

The site is secure.

The ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Purpose: The colon coordinates fecal elimination while reabsorbing excess fluid. Extended colonic resection removes synchronous and prevents metachronous disease but may adversely alter bowel function and health-related quality of life to a greater degree than segmental resection. This study examined the short-term morbidity and long-term function and quality of life after colon resections of different extents.

Methods: Patients undergoing extended resections (n = 201, subtotal colectomy with ileosigmoid or total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis) and segmental colonic resections (n = 321) during 1991 to 2003 were reviewed for perioperative outcomes and surveyed for bowel function and quality of life using an institutional questionnaire and a validated quality of life instrument (response rate: 70 percent).

Results: The most common indication for extended resections was multiple polyps, and for segmental resections, single malignancy. The complication-free rate was 75.4 percent after segmental resections, 42.8 percent after ileosigmoid anastomosis, and 60 percent after ileorectal anastomosis. Median daily stool frequency was two after segmental resections, four after ileosigmoid anastomosis, and five after ileorectal anastomosis, despite considerable dietary restrictions (55.6 percent) and medication use (19.6 percent daily) after ileorectal anastomosis. Significant proportions of patients felt restricted from preoperative social activity (31.5 percent), housework (20.4 percent), recreation (31.5 percent), and travel (42.6 percent) after ileorectal anastomosis. The overall quality of life after segmental resection, ileosigmoid anastomosis, and ileorectal anastomosis was 98.5, 94.9, and 91.2, respectively.

Conclusions: Measurable compromises in long-term bowel function and quality of life were observed after extended vs. segmental resections. The relative differences in patient-related outcomes should be deliberated against the clinical benefits of extended resection for the individual patient.

DynareOBC uses a perturbation approximation, which quickly captures the effects of some risks, but may still miss some important curvature in decision rules. It is guaranteed to find a solution if one exists. Additionally, it makes a further approximation to dramatically reduce the cost of integrating over future uncertainty.

ps. Edited 3/5/2020 and moved my follow up questions about Stochastic Extended Path documentation to a separate thread, to make this focused only on the differences between Stochastic Extended Path and Dynare OBC.

Hi @moshaarawy if you selling your good and subscription only on your business website then standard license is enough but if you give access to customer and they are able to content uploading/submission then you have to get extended license.

Although we endeavor to make our web sites work with a wide variety of browsers, we can only support browsers that provide sufficiently modern support for web standards. Thus, this site requires the use of reasonably up-to-date versions of Google Chrome, FireFox, Internet Explorer (IE 9 or greater), or Safari (5 or greater). If you are experiencing trouble with the web site, please try one of these alternative browsers. If you need further assistance, you may write to he...@aps.org.

The case of a coupling between dark energy and matter [coupled quintessence (CQ)] or gravity [extended quintessence (EQ)] has recently attracted a deep interest and has been widely investigated both in the Einstein and in the Jordan frames (EF, JF), within scalar-tensor theories. Focusing on the simplest models proposed so far, in this paper we study the relation existing between the two scenarios, isolating the Weyl scaling which allows one to express them in the EF and JF. Moreover, we perform a comparative study of the behavior of linear perturbations in both scenarios, which turn out to behave in a markedly different way. In particular, while the clustering is enhanced in the considered CQ models with respect to the corresponding quintessence ones where the coupling is absent and to the ordinary cosmologies with a cosmological constant and cold dark matter (ΛCDM), structures in EQ models may grow slower. This is likely to have direct consequences on the inner properties of nonlinear structures, like cluster concentration, as well as on the weak lensing shear on large scales. Finally, we specialize our study for interfacing linear dynamics and N-body simulations in these cosmologies, giving a recipe for the corrections to be included in N-body codes in order to take into account the modifications to the expansion rate, growth of structures, and strength of gravity.

It depends on what features you actually used in your document. Some features or aspects thereof can not or only insufficiently be saved in 1.3 non-extended. The difference was larger between 1.2 and 1.2 Extended of which a chunk of extensions was added to ODF 1.3 then.

In all honesty, I want to have a more direct relationship with the readers and listeners who follow me, a place to write freely and share recommendations outside of the creep show that is social media.

For years, I wanted to make a Substack about the stuff we cut out of polite conversation, the stuff people rarely talk about, especially when it comes to work, workaholism, living in a female body in mid-life and feeling less FEMPOWERED than like a sentient pile of dust. I didn\u2019t know what to name it or what color to make it and these things stopped me for\u2026forever. Then one day while googling/procrastinating/brain-fog drifting, I came across a page on color theory: \u201CThe color purple is generally associated with power and ambition. Purple is also used to represent creativity, extravagance, dignity, grandeur, independence, pride, peace, mystery, and magic\u201C and I thought HELL YES I want to write a newsletter about: power, ambition, creativity, extravagance, dignity, grandeur, independence, pride, peace, mystery and magic. And here we are.

3a8082e126