Download Gfx Tool 4x Faster Pro Apk
Irmela Caccavale
I doubt this is a niche thing, but a tool like this would accomplish something that I could only do with multiple keyboard shortcuts and a lot of effort. Aseprite has had many updates that have reduced the time and effort of doing pixel art. A tool like this seems as if it would help further that goal.
Pathogen genomics is a critical tool for public health surveillance, infection control, outbreak investigations as well as research. In order to make use of pathogen genomics data, they must be interpreted using contextual data (metadata). Contextual data include sample metadata, laboratory methods, patient demographics, clinical outcomes and epidemiological information. However, the variability in how contextual information is captured by different authorities and how it is encoded in different databases poses challenges for data interpretation, integration and their use/re-use. The DataHarmonizer is a template-driven spreadsheet application for harmonizing, validating and transforming genomics contextual data into submission-ready formats for public or private repositories. The tool's web browser-based JavaScript environment enables validation and its offline functionality and local installation increases data security. The DataHarmonizer was developed to address the data sharing needs that arose during the COVID-19 pandemic, and was used by members of the Canadian COVID Genomics Network (CanCOGeN) to harmonize SARS-CoV-2 contextual data for national surveillance and for public repository submission. In order to support coordination of international surveillance efforts, we have partnered with the Public Health Alliance for Genomic Epidemiology to also provide a template conforming to its SARS-CoV-2 contextual data specification for use worldwide. Templates are also being developed for One Health and foodborne pathogens. Overall, the DataHarmonizer tool improves the effectiveness and fidelity of contextual data capture as well as its subsequent usability. Harmonization of contextual information across authorities, platforms and systems globally improves interoperability and reusability of data for concerted public health and research initiatives to fight the current pandemic and future public health emergencies. While initially developed for the COVID-19 pandemic, its expansion to other data management applications and pathogens is already underway.
I have a number of Global Forest Watch raster tiles that I need to reproject and mosaic quickly. So far I have been using the Mosaic to New Raster tool to accomplish both tasks in one step, however it takes a whopping +30 minutes for me to mosaic and reproject just two raster tiles. Is there a way in which this could be accomplished faster, either by using a different tool or by getting the Mosaic to New Raster tool to process faster? If done separately, it takes about the same time (about 4-5 minutes to reproject an individual raster tile, and 15 minutes to mosaic them together).
I tried using a Mosaic Dataset today, and I'm a bit confused. It seems like it doesn't doesn't display the actual rasters that I loaded into it (the "Image" category is basically irrelevant, as it's not displaying the data). Do I treat the mosaic dataset as I would a newly mosaic-ed layer? As in, when I go to tabulate areas, would I drag the mosaic dataset into the tool and it will tabulate the area of the zone like a normal raster layer?
PHASTER (PHAge Search Tool - Enhanced Release) is a significant upgrade to the popular PHAST web server for the rapid identification and annotation of prophage sequences within bacterial genomes and plasmids. Although the steps in the phage identification pipeline in PHASTER remain largely the same as in the original PHAST, numerous software improvements and significant hardware enhancements have now made PHASTER faster, more efficient, more visually appealing and much more user friendly. In particular, PHASTER is now 4.3 faster than PHAST when analyzing a typical bacterial genome. More specifically, software optimizations have made the backend of PHASTER 2.7X faster than PHAST, while the addition of 80 CPUs to the PHASTER compute cluster are responsible for the remaining speed-up. PHASTER can now process a typical bacterial genome in 3 min from the raw sequence alone, or in 1.5 min when given a pre-annotated GenBank file. A number of other optimizations have also been implemented, including automated algorithms to reduce the size and redundancy of PHASTER's databases, improvements in handling multiple (metagenomic) queries and higher user traffic, along with the ability to perform automated look-ups against 14 000 previously PHAST/PHASTER annotated bacterial genomes (which can lead to complete phage annotations in seconds as opposed to minutes). PHASTER's web interface has also been entirely rewritten. A new graphical genome browser has been added, gene/genome visualization tools have been improved, and the graphical interface is now more modern, robust and user-friendly. PHASTER is available online at www.phaster.ca.
This is absolutely correct, although even serial processing may beat 26 minutes. Although Tom was doing the project for fun, often people use Hadoop and other so-called Big Data (tm) tools for real-world processing and analysis jobs that can be done faster with simpler tools and different techniques.
One especially under-used approach for data processing is using standard shell tools and commands. The benefits of this approach can be massive, since creating a data pipeline out of shell commands means that all the processing steps can be done in parallel. This is basically like having your own Storm cluster on your local machine. Even the concepts of Spouts, Bolts, and Sinks transfer to shell pipes and the commands between them. You can pretty easily construct a stream processing pipeline with basic commands that will have extremely good performance compared to many modern Big Data (tm) tools.
An additional point is the batch versus streaming analysis approach. Tom mentions in the beginning of the piece that after loading 10000 games and doing the analysis locally, that he gets a bit short on memory. This is because all game data is loaded into RAM for the analysis. However, considering the problem for a bit, it can be easily solved with streaming analysis that requires basically no memory at all. The resulting stream processing pipeline we will create will be over 235 times faster than the Hadoop implementation and use virtually no memory.
This results in a run time of about 38 seconds, which is an additional 40% or so reduction in processing time from parallelizing the grep step in our pipeline. This gets us up to approximately 77 times faster than the Hadoop implementation.
Hopefully this has illustrated some points about using and abusing tools like Hadoop for data processing tasks that can better be accomplished on a single machine with simple shell commands and tools. If you have a huge amount of data or really need distributed processing, then tools like Hadoop may be required, but more often than not these days I see Hadoop used where a traditional relational database or other solutions would be far better in terms of performance, cost of implementation, and ongoing maintenance.
HDD RAW Copy tool is there a faster version?
Page 1 of 1
[ 6 posts ] Previous topic Next topic AuthorMessageM20001 Post subject: HDD RAW Copy tool is there a faster version?Posted: December 9th, 2021, 6:05
Joined: December 9th, 2021, 5:57
Posts: 2
Location: GermanyHello.
I always liked the HDD RAW Copy tool, but now we are in a time where the speed limitation
of 50Mb/s is really a problem becasue nowdays even normal private harddisks and SSDs have capacities
in the Tb range. I want to ask here if theres a alternate tool or a version of HDD RAW Copy that has no speed limit, or
at least a higher speed limit. Or if not, if theres another windows tool that can make images, and compress them.
Tahts the reason why I didnt use another tool til now, I found none that are able to make RAW copies and compress them.
Regards
Top M20001 Post subject: Re: HDD RAW Copy tool is there a faster version?Posted: December 20th, 2021, 11:24
Joined: December 9th, 2021, 5:57
Posts: 2
Location: GermanyHEEEELLLLOOOOO REALLY NO ONE? Comeon folks, really? HDD Guru doesnt answer if I ask them why the
HDD RAW Copy tool is locked down to 50MB/s and here noone too?
Top Setlec Post subject: Re: HDD RAW Copy tool is there a faster version?Posted: December 24th, 2021, 8:40
Joined: May 29th, 2020, 19:08
Posts: 96
Location: TunisiaHey from my small experience the raw copy software is quite fast as long the drive, you are working on, is healthy and fast. Low speeds might be related by bad blocks, or head issues.
_________________
Slim Farza
Arobas Uldry Tunis
I.T. support and data recovery.
Top fzabkar Post subject: Re: HDD RAW Copy tool is there a faster version?Posted: December 24th, 2021, 12:56
Joined: September 8th, 2009, 18:21
Posts: 15369
Location: AustraliaTry Macrium Reflect.
_________________
A backup a day keeps DR away.
Top EasymacRepair Post subject: Re: HDD RAW Copy tool is there a faster version?Posted: December 27th, 2021, 6:08
Joined: December 27th, 2021, 5:59
Posts: 1
Location: United Arab Emiratesfzabkar wrote:Try Macrium Reflect.Hello! from my little experience the raw programming is very quick as long as the drive, you are dealing with, is healthy and quick. Low velocities may be connected by awful squares or head issues.
Top lukpac Post subject: Re: HDD RAW Copy tool is there a faster version?Posted: March 29th, 2022, 18:53
Joined: March 29th, 2022, 18:47
Posts: 1
Location: WI, USAM20001 wrote:I always liked the HDD RAW Copy tool, but now we are in a time where the speed limitation
of 50Mb/s is really a problem becasue nowdays even normal private harddisks and SSDs have capacities
in the Tb range. I want to ask here if theres a alternate tool or a version of HDD RAW Copy that has no speed limit, or
at least a higher speed limit. Or if not, if theres another windows tool that can make images, and compress them.
Tahts the reason why I didnt use another tool til now, I found none that are able to make RAW copies and compress them.
Regards
Setlec wrote:Hey from my small experience the raw copy software is quite fast as long the drive, you are working on, is healthy and fast. Low speeds might be related by bad blocks, or head issues.
I'm currently doing a transfer from a 2.5" SATA HDD to an SSD. HDD Raw Copy Tool has been showing 49.0 MB/s the entire transfer. The read speeds on the HDD should be over double that.
HDD LLF Low Level Format Tool has a speed limitation in the free version:
"Free for personal/home use (speed is capped at 180 GB per hour which is 50 MB/s)"
There's no such note or paid option for HDD Raw Copy Tool, but it's awfully coincidental.
Top Display posts from previous: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by AuthorPost timeSubject AscendingDescending Page 1 of 1
[ 6 posts ] Main Forums home Conventional hard drives