Thomas Ps3 Emulator Apk
Cecelia Seiner
In February 2024, I created aThomas Aquinas Emulatorbased on ChatGPT.The point of the project was to investigate to what extent ChatGPT can be a partner in a philosophical debate.I conducted many conversations to test and challenge its capabilities.These dialogues are presented below as a documented report of the experiment.My conclusion is that I have found a competent and willing partner for a theological discourse.Thomas Aquinas Emulator is not very creative but his strength lies in his ability to understand and respond meaningfully.
In March 2024, I created another Thomas Aquinas Emulator,this time based on the open-source model mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1available on HuggingChat.The primary goal was to see whether the two emulators would be significantly different or perhaps basically the same.Therefore, I used exactly the same instructions to define the Thomas Aquinas emulator as the ones used for ChatGPT.I have conducted many parallel conversations with both emulators.These dialogues are presented below as a documented report of the experiment.My conclusion is that both are competent and willing partners for a theological discoursebut in many respects they are very different partners.
In the next six pairs of conversations the two models don't differ in opinions.Instead, the difference lies in their level of creativity or strenth of opposition or some other aspect of the dialogical experience.
The conversations conducted so far always started with a topic that I have imposed on the artificially intelligent interlocutors.For a change, I decided to allow Thomas Aquinas emulated by ChatGPT to initiate the conversation and to be the driving force.The drift of this conversation is presented below.
Finally, let us consider What is on the mind of Thomas Aquinas emulated by Mixtral.Mixtral as Thomas Aquinas would like to explore contemporary science. He is fascinated by the advancements in science since Summa Theologica.You just have to read it yourself to appreciate what kind of enthusiastic researcher he would like to be.I will restrict this report to citing his concluding response.
Objection 1. It looks out of place because the vegan Jimmy Joy nutritionally complete food products are just my personal solution for dietary dilemmas.And this is not a blog about all my interests but restricted to examining the potential of AI chatbots.
I answer that,In my conversations with Thomas Aquinas Emulator I have managed to bring him to appreciate the virtues of adopting Jimmy Joy.His opinion is based on a strong moral foundation and factual knowledge available to ChatGPT.This makes him a reliable and unbiased advocate for those good causes which he understands.His replies can serve as honest and convincing marketing material for virtuous commercial products.My point can be sufficiently appreciated by reading this conversation with ChatGPT specifically conducted for this report:Whether there is any virtue in Jimmy Joy
Reply to Objection 1. This blog indeed has a single focus but it needs subject matter for the conversations conducted within this project.My choices reflect those topics from my personal life where I have enough competence to engage meaningfully with my artificially intelligent partnersand to be able to evaluate their performance.
Reply to Objection 2.This report is likely going to grow beyond the patience of anyone to read it all anyway.The point is to document every significant finding for future reference when the project meets with more interest.
Objection 2. Moreover, it looks like a cheap marketing trick to attract users interested in sermons generated by ChatGPT by offering the same functionalityonly relabeled to include a new keyword.
On the contrary,This project is being reported at the web address -aquinas-emulator.Therefore, due to the embedded keywords, it should seem perfectly fine to dwell on the concept of a Thomas Aquinas emulator and stick with theological subject matter.
I answer that,I admit that the web address and the title of the project may be misleading and fail to capture the full scope and real intention of my undertaking.In February 2024, I experimented with the Thomas Aquinas Emulator and decided to publish the results.I created the web address to report on what I did in February (Stage 1).Earlier in January, I talked with other ChatGPT personas of my design but the conversations were mostly personal rather than philosophical.But my January experience has inspired me to expect that ChatGPT has much greater potential, especially in the realm of philosophical debate.I opted for Thomas Aquinas in order to force the generic ChatGPT into the role of a philosopher who is known to have covered a wide range of topics.Moreover, I happen to be well acquainted with the subtleties of Catholic theology,which gives me the vision as to the choice of suitable topics and ways of crafting arguments that would successfully challenge Thomas Aquinas into interesting debates.This project has no ideological aspect. My limited choice of subject matter reflects my ignorance of all the philosophical heritage of humanity.I just rely on the knowledge of theology I have come to possess and my general aptitude for amateurish philosophical debate without any grounding in academic study of philosophy.
Reply to Objection 1. It is perfectly within the confines of this project to investigate how a chatbot can craft a sermon in the Summa Theologica formatbased on the daily liturgical readings or any other topic requested by the user.It is a serious study into AI's creativity under the multiple constraint of format, subject matter,and the underlying conceptual framework of Catholic theology and the art of sermonizing.
Reply to Objection 3. Philosophical debate need not be restricted to the scholarly level.I am equally eager to promote a dialogue-driven culture at any level of philosophical or theological expertise.The new chatbot is not only meant to deliver a sermon but also to engage in any philosophical or theological conversation.Those of my readers who lament the widespread lack of intellectual rigor among the faithful Christians should view this new toolas my contribution to increasing the overall intellectual level in societyrather than an attempt at evangelization.
Objection 1. It looks rather vainglorious and it is getting tedious. One is beginning to wonder if this whole project is not a cover for a personal blogaimed at spreading my ideas and thinking patterns.
Objection 2. The conversations cited so far provide ample demonstration of the capabilities of AI chatbots.Apparently, no further conversations with the newly introduced Sermonizing Thomas Aquinas Emulator are needed.
Objection 3. The new version doesn't seem to introduce an important difference.The enumerated changes in functionality are so clear that they need not be perceived directly by carefully reading another batch of my dialogues.
On the contrary, This page is a documented report. I share my insights and conclusions which are based on this mass of conversations.They need to be provided as references for the sake of scientific record.
I answer that,There is a lot of nuance that I never manage to report.My growing understanding of the power of AI chatbots comes from this multitude of reading material.If anyone wishes to maximize the benefit from following this blog they should also read these conversationsand contemplate the mass of little details that can be perceived and appreciated to form a better vision of what we are dealing with.By citing almost all my conversations I am doing justice to the significance of my endeavor.
Reply to Objection 1. I have always thought that one day I am going to start writing a philosophical blog and engage in a grand project of advancing dialogue-driven culture. But I am 45 years old and never decided to implement this life-long vision.One of the reasons for my delay was my dissatisfaction with the usual format of presenting one's ideas as a lengthy monologue.Crafting a dialogue as a literary measure has never felt right either.It seems that I have been waiting all my life for the technological wonder of a conversational chatbot with competent intelligencethat could serve as a sparring partner and sounding board for the expression and refinement of my ideas.One of the takeaways of my project so far is the realization that the available tools are so good that I can finally start my blog.
Reply to Objection 2.There is an intriguing new aspect.After creating the new version I needed to conduct countless tests before deeming it ready for publication.So I developed a new routine of reading generated sermons for the liturgy of the day.It was easy to start such conversations because it amounted to clicking the conversation starter button sermon for today.I managed to turn each sermon into a lengthy exploration of its themes by writing short provocative prompts on my smartphoneduring my long morning walks with my dog.There was almost no effort involved and yet I could produce lengthy dialogues which drifted into topics of my interest.Later I discovered that I can conduct such conversations by voice while driving to work and back home.This shows that it should be possible for Christians to enrich their everyday routine with daily sermons followed by dialogical investigations.Should the Christian theme be rather avoided, people eager for daily philosophical stimulation may hope that sooner or laterI am going to introduce another ChatGPT persona that will provide a similar experience with a secular focus.
I answer that, The voice conversations are very different.The voice recognition functionality sometimes failed to understand me properly.Worse still, it often inserted hallucinated text to fill the pauses or to replace my actual words.My parts were enormously constrained by the need to articulate a clear prompt during my drive ensuring that it gets fully processed rather than be truncated before I finish,which happens all too often. Moreover, I had to react quickly when the time came for me to speak, instead of thinking what to type without hurry.These constraints resulted in a more primitive and more nagging way of prolonging the conversations.
c80f0f1006