Hatewatching is a sport that used to fall under the broad term "guilty pleasure," but now seems retrofitted for the age of social media. It goes something like this: You watch a show you wouldn't choose to watch for any reason other than to mock it for its awfulness - say, by sharing snide Twitter exchanges with like-minded hate-watchers when the program airs. Collective delight.
Just consider the following circa-1994 gem of dialogue, as Michael confesses sheepishly to Kimberly, "I don't know how to say this, but ... um ... when I heard that you had died - y'know, grief and confusion - well, it's just ... um ... I got MARRIED!"
Classic hate-watching content! And even back in those dial-up, pre-Web days when "Melrose Place" was on the air, a howler like this line of dialogue could be savored communally, thanks to an innovative form of proto-social media: Mere hours after "Melrose Place" had aired, "The 'Melrose Place' Update" was ready and emailed to fellow fans by a twentysomething visionary in Bellevue, Wash., named Ian Ferrell.
It was therefore left to Ferrell to deconstruct each episode, cataloguing its meaningful glances, its tearful "I'm sorry" confessions and all the scenes that culminated with sex - not to mention shining a light into its cavernous plot holes.
Ferrell (who today works at Microsoft) also welcomed other viewers' thoughts on the show, such as this satisfied assessment from one "Melrose" regular: "It's badly written, not very well-acted, and irresistible."
These days, it's "Smash" that's winning similar hate-love. A spirited discussion on a recent edition of Slate magazine's "Culture Gabfest" podcast explored the term "hate-watch," with "Smash" singled out as a glaring example. On Twitter, (hash)hatewatching became a trending topic.
I must quickly add that I disagree with this particular position. I watched the entire first season of "Smash," but never in hate-watching mode. I am pleased to say I love "Smash," minority voice though I may be.
But where, I wonder, is the hate in hate-watching directed? Toward the characters on the show? To the show overall? To the people who created it or put it on the air? To the wide-eyed viewers who truly like it and watch with no ulterior motives?
The answer is unclear. But the essence of hate-watching seems to take its cue from a wisecrack once made about newspapers: TV shows are never good enough, but a bad one is a joy forever. Hate-watching can redeem a multitude of sins.
Or would I fall short in my effort to find TV pleasure in TV pain? Odds are, I'd surrender long before the show is over, hobbled by this thought: No matter if it hurts so good to watch, its awfulness will always still be awfulness.
After all, our church streams our services live online. I could literally watch live on any device I own anywhere. Plus we share the services on demand, so I could watch or listen any time during the week via our website or catch the message for free via podcast.
Generations ago, the church was a social and cultural hub as well as a missional hub. In addition to faith reasons, people loved going to church because it was one of a handful of options available in a community as well as the main way (other than personal devotions) you connect with God.
Second, focus on engaging people in the mission of the church. Nothing is more exciting. Nothing will change the world more powerfully than the love of Christ shared with a world that so desperately needs it.
I recently watched some videos on YouTube that came us as recommended to me which seemed to be completely random. I decided to watch one video which of course led to others, and these featured what is now known as the love and hate rice experiment. The idea comes from an original experiment done some years ago by a japanese man called Dr. Masaru Emoto who did an experiement that featured putting water into different petri dishes, exposing the water to different words and emotions, and then freezing the water samples to see how the crystals of water had arranged themselves. The experiement has been critisized for the way it was done (things scientists complained would skew the results) however if you trusted the results, they showed that the crystals of water that had positive words like love and gratitude had frozen into beautiful crystals of water that looked like amazing snowflakes, white the water that had been expoosed to hate had crystals that had frozen into no real structure and ended up looking like murky blobs of water.
But nobody expects a child born into this world to hate themselves. Nobody wants to see a child cry, despair and feel unworthy of happiness and life. And if no child deserves that then why would they when they grow up. The fact is, no matter what has happened in your life, words are powerful. Netative words are filled with the power to make us doubt ourselves, to make us feel unworthy and unloveable. But positive words have the power to heal those wounds, to make us feel worthy, happy, loved and excited to face the world we live in.
The Strawberry Post is unfortunately not responsible for the amount of ads currently running on this site and apologises for any inconvenience this causes visitors. The ads are the responsibility of Wordpress which you can read more about here.
Content on this site is the copyright The Strawberry Post 2018-2024. All rights reserved. No part of this website including images or text may be copied or reproduced anywhere without the prior written consent of the owner/creator.
Personally, I cannot understand romance in movies. They are absolutely non sequitur and take up way too much screen time. Also, romance is used as an unnecessary plot device for creating conflict, because the conflict could have been avoided if the character had just not fallen in love, which to me, is the most totally reasonable thing to do, but apparently not for the character.
I would prefer to see action and scenes where I actually understand what's going on. Also kissing scenes are by far the worse because it's unnecessarily emotional, you get a fucking close up on the couple's lips which is fucking gross, it's taking up precious screentime and the precedence for the kiss never makes sense.
I hate cheesy stuff but that's just me. I love romance if it goes alongside the plot and makes sense/the characters have chemistry, I just don't find it interesting when it IS the plot, or when it seems inorganic. Especially your run of the mill white hetero movies plots. It's almost condescending to hear how difficult and beautiful and unique this epic love story between an upper class white woman and a lower middle class white man is... like come on. Or when two characters are put together simply because... every single movie ever needs a romance plot, I guess? Fuck if I know.
Honestly it doesn't even bother me that it's something I'll never have. I mean, sometimes I feel sad about it (I was watching the episode of The Office last night where Jim and Pam get married), but not that much. Edit: even when I feel sad, it's more that I feel sad that I won't WANT to have it, I really feel no desire to have that, it's not like I feel like I actually want it but just "can't" have it. I'm envious of the characters' ability to want that, not of the fact that they do have it I don't, if that makes sense.
Mostly what pisses me off is the constant assumption that I, personally, must experience romantic and sexual attraction. You can hardly get two feet without somebody assuming that you want sex/romance. I suppose one reason to dislike romance movies is that that feeds into it. You see a romance movie and everyone is going "isn't [main white actor] so hot?? do you wish you could find a guy like that??" NO! I don't lol, and he's not even that great anyway.
I like romance in general and there have been some romance novels that I've liked. It's the fact that our media is over saturated with romance that irritates me. You don't need to pair everyone in every story. We don't need 80% of the music on the radio to be about romance. There are so many other kinds of relationships and dynamics that are interesting to explore but hardly anyone does and that's frustrating. And when every story you hear the motivation for every main character is their love for a significant other, it can make you feel isolated and less human when it's not a motivation in your life.
In movies and TV if it serves a purpose other than just *I feel we need boobs on screen now*. Even GoT has a lot of sex but it's world-building and makes sense to have it most of the time, but in some cases it's like the directors feel they need to have it for the ratings and then it just feels corny so I care not for it.
I would hazard a guess that it's down to the inability (or at least problems) to relate to the subject. Romance stories hardly ever make SENSE to me, because they describe experiences I don't make that way. I have trouble relating to the characters in romance stories/movies or to the emotions described in romantic/sexual songs. I feel the same way about movies/songs that deal with other things I don't enjoy/don't care about.
Add to that the fact that romance is a very common topic. It's like the commercial for a product you don't care about or don't want to have, that keeps coming on again and again, blaring from your radio when you're driving the car, when you're at work or at home, potentially 24/7. I don't hate romance. I don't hate electric tooth brushes, either. Throw them at me with enough persistence and I will get annoyed by either of them.
I don't mind romance songs. I have playlists that contain many of them. I for example quite like Meat Loaf's music. It's full of romance, but the music is good. If it's my own playlist, I don't have to listen to anything romancy if I don't want to at the time. I can always put on something else. At home, with my own music library to call on, I can put on Nightwish's latest album and listen to songs about evolution. My own music collection contains a real lot of non-romance songs, so when in a long playlist the occasional romance song comes on, it doesn't matter.
3a8082e126