rails 3.x

15 views
Skip to first unread message

Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::.

unread,
Aug 3, 2011, 6:12:47 AM8/3/11
to ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin
I have been working last weeks with rails 3.0 and vhochstein's fork. While
trying the fork I added some commits from master branch (now named as v2.4)
which was missing in vhochstein's fork, and fixing some bugs I found.

Now I have committed the work of these weeks to rails-3.0 branch. Master
branch works with rails 3.1, it's like vhochstein's repo with changes I added
to rails-3.0 branch. However I think there are some bits which don't work.

I will release a gem in some days, I suppose it will be named active_scaffold,
without _vho suffix, and it will continue with next active_scaffold_vho version.


--
Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::.
Mariana Pineda 23, 50.018 Zaragoza
T) 902 021 404 F) 976 52 98 07 E) ser...@entrecables.com

Nick Rogers

unread,
Aug 3, 2011, 5:11:31 PM8/3/11
to actives...@googlegroups.com
Awesome news!. Thanks for all the hard work.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group.
To post to this group, send email to actives...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to activescaffol...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en.


Nick Rogers

unread,
Aug 9, 2011, 3:10:00 PM8/9/11
to actives...@googlegroups.com
Can we bring in batch_update/destroy/mark actions and other features from vhochstein's fork at some point?

Ed W

unread,
Aug 9, 2011, 6:02:55 PM8/9/11
to actives...@googlegroups.com
On 03/08/2011 11:12, Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::. wrote:
> I have been working last weeks with rails 3.0 and vhochstein's fork. While
> trying the fork I added some commits from master branch (now named as v2.4)
> which was missing in vhochstein's fork, and fixing some bugs I found.
>
> Now I have committed the work of these weeks to rails-3.0 branch. Master
> branch works with rails 3.1, it's like vhochstein's repo with changes I added
> to rails-3.0 branch. However I think there are some bits which don't work.
>
> I will release a gem in some days, I suppose it will be named active_scaffold,
> without _vho suffix, and it will continue with next active_scaffold_vho version.
>
>

Oh, absolutely fantastic! Many thanks to both you and vhockstein!

Cheers

Ed W

Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::.

unread,
Aug 10, 2011, 2:41:58 AM8/10/11
to actives...@googlegroups.com
On Martes, 9 de Agosto de 2011 21:10:00 Nick Rogers escribió:
> Can we bring in batch_update/destroy/mark actions and other features
> from vhochstein's
> fork at some point?

I used vhochstein's fork directly, with some patches and fixes above it. All
features should be there.

Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::.

unread,
Aug 12, 2011, 3:52:00 AM8/12/11
to actives...@googlegroups.com
On Miércoles, 10 de Agosto de 2011 08:41:58 Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L.
::. escribió:

> On Martes, 9 de Agosto de 2011 21:10:00 Nick Rogers escribió:
> > Can we bring in batch_update/destroy/mark actions and other features
> > from vhochstein's
> > fork at some point?
>
> I used vhochstein's fork directly, with some patches and fixes above it.
> All features should be there.on connect

Mark action should be in active_scaffold. Batch actions I think they are in
active_scaffold_batch, which is a vhochstein's plugin. It should still work.

Richard Zheng

unread,
Aug 25, 2011, 6:36:47 PM8/25/11
to actives...@googlegroups.com
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::. <ser...@entrecables.com> wrote:
I have been working last weeks with rails 3.0 and vhochstein's fork. While
trying the fork I added some commits from master branch (now named as v2.4)
which was missing in vhochstein's fork, and fixing some bugs I found.

Now I have committed the work of these weeks to rails-3.0 branch. Master
branch works with rails 3.1, it's like vhochstein's repo with changes I added
to rails-3.0 branch. However I think there are some bits which don't work.

Does it mean that there is only one version going forward? That's awesome!! Well done! 

Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::.

unread,
Aug 26, 2011, 3:34:22 AM8/26/11
to actives...@googlegroups.com

Yes, I hope release active_scaffold gem in some days. I must fix generators I
broke first.

--

Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages