Official branch, commiters, future and a bug.

22 views
Skip to first unread message

clyfe

unread,
Sep 26, 2011, 5:31:50 PM9/26/11
to actives...@googlegroups.com
I noticed that the official branch is pushing towards rails 3.1.

1. Does current Volker's work go to official ? Or he is still working in his own fork?
2. Does official AS repo require "jquery-rails_vho" ("Create Another" button on a has_many association subform does not trigger ajax, I'm using basic "jquery-rails" gem)
3. What are your thoughts (scambra?) about translating to coffeescript and integrate backbone.js which I find highly suitable ?

PS
I authored some bridges like CanCan and CarrierWave :D

clyfe

unread,
Sep 26, 2011, 5:40:02 PM9/26/11
to actives...@googlegroups.com
Oh, and also what's the current state of the tests ?

Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::.

unread,
Sep 27, 2011, 4:20:41 AM9/27/11
to actives...@googlegroups.com
On Lunes, 26 de Septiembre de 2011 23:31:50 clyfe escribió:
> I noticed that the official branch is pushing towards rails 3.1.
>
> 1. Does current Volker's work go to official ? Or he is still working in
> his own fork?

I merged volker work in official repo.

> 2. Does official AS repo require "jquery-rails_vho" ("Create Another"
> button on a has_many association subform does not trigger ajax, I'm using
> basic "jquery-rails" gem)

No, official repo use jquery-rails gem. If something doesn't work, report it and
I will fix.

> 3. What are your thoughts (scambra?) about translating to coffeescript and
> integrate backbone.js which I find highly suitable ?

I don't know backbone, but I have no time for a rewrite of JS part, although
I'm not sure coffescript improves something.

I would like to simplify code using more rails features
(accept_nested_attributes_for and update_attributes for example), avoid class
variables modification in requests using instances of proxy classes for per
request configuration and add tests. These are my main areas of interest now.

Anyway, If backbone and coffescript simplify code, I will accept contributions.

>
> PS
> I authored some bridges like CanCan and CarrierWave :D

Thanks for your contributions

--
Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::.
Mariana Pineda 23, 50.018 Zaragoza
T) 902 021 404 F) 976 52 98 07 E) ser...@entrecables.com

clyfe

unread,
Sep 27, 2011, 4:41:51 AM9/27/11
to actives...@googlegroups.com
Could we please enable the issue tracker on GitHub? I find it more useful to work with in regard to .. ahem .. issues, instead the google group.

clyfe

unread,
Sep 27, 2011, 5:02:00 AM9/27/11
to actives...@googlegroups.com
I'd say this is what makes the difference regarding the "Create Another" not fireing the ajax:

clyfe

unread,
Sep 27, 2011, 5:09:43 AM9/27/11
to actives...@googlegroups.com

clyfe

unread,
Sep 27, 2011, 5:13:20 AM9/27/11
to actives...@googlegroups.com
As you can see the "input[data-remote]" for click selectors is only present in volker's fork.

Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::.

unread,
Sep 27, 2011, 5:31:52 AM9/27/11
to actives...@googlegroups.com
On Martes, 27 de Septiembre de 2011 11:13:20 clyfe escribió:
> As you can see the "input[data-remote]" for click selectors is only present
> in volker's fork.

Thanks, I have changed them to links and fixed a bug.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages