Last year we had 9 people over 200 miles, also 9 out of
33 the year before.
I've had a little over 300 miles as my goal the last three years,
actually 325 KM, because the first year I declared it, if I'd
gotten it, it would have given me actually 201.some_high_decimal,
which would have been about half a mile more than Don Winkley
got the year he won it outright two or three years before,
at the same age I was that year. I got 180 and 188 for my
two best years, then had physical problems both the last
two years.
This year I kept the same goal, but will not make that in
any way shape or form because moving and adjusting to a
new life has kept me from running.
A couple of years ago Aaron Goldman got over 200 miles at
age 71 I think it was, and that performance inspired me
both the last two years, and made me think that perhaps
I could still hope for 200. And I'd like to think that
if I train right and the circumstances are right and I
go for it within the next year or two, I might be able
to do it. But I'll admit that the dream is staring to
fade.
> I wonder how many will reach their goals. I'm thinking 10% +/- of
> stated goal is success. Lets see how it works out. (You 24 and 48 hour
> runners will have to figure out your own success.
> I also noted that there have never been more than 10 runners reach 200
> miles in 72 hours at ATY. It is sad to think there might be a few
> runners starting 2008 disappointed.
It's only been the last three years that the better runners have been
showing up.
As I look over the list, I count 11 that I would expect to make
200 if they don't have problems.
> We'll talk about 300 miles later.
That takes a Kouros, Geesler, or Mangan. My money would be on
Tony Mangan to take it all this year.
I don't think Paul DeWitt will get 165 miles, not without Jurek
to push him, but I still think he'll win.
And I'd bet Eppelman will win the 48.
But you never know. As Chris Berman says -- that's why they play
the game.
--
Lynn