> Would you run to beat your own personal record for most
> miles ever ran?
Always. That doesn't mean it will always happen. PRs
aren't pulled out of a hat.
This year I fully expect to set a PW. Because of my
move east I've been unable to train hardly at all since
before SF 24-hour. So it's my intention to just show up
and do whatever I can do. I have no real mileage goal
this year. Nonetheless, every year until now I have run
intending and expecting to do my best ever.
> Would you run to just try and make it 24, 48, or 72
> hours period, even if you had to walk most of it?
This question is not clear. The last couple of years I
have indeed had to walk most of it, but I've been out
there pounding out miles when I can. People have gotten
over 200 miles just walking 72 hours.
> Would you try to compete with the other runners,
Not usually, unless I can see that it's close and I
think I have a realistic chance.
> pushing hard to get those couple extra miles that
> may allow you to move up a space or two in the
> overall placing? Or would you not risk getting hurt
> or tired and stay at your own pace?
> Would you try to make it 24, 48 or 72 hours with out
> sleeping?
Runners need to get sleep when it overwhelms them.
There is no advantage to fighting it. At the same time,
a power nap is often all that is needed. I've gotten by
on as little as a couple of hours of sleep a night in
72-hour races, and have gone the whole night in 24-hour
races several times without problems. I rested a bit
(about 15 minutes each twice, and 10 minutes a third
time), SF 24-hour, but did not sleep.
> How long and often would you sleep?
Your body will tell you when. When I can no longer
stand it, I sleep. I usually wake up sufficiently to
continue in a few minutes. If I'm still sleepy, I do it
again. When day light returns, so does ability to
continue running.
> Would you wear the same pair of shoes the entire
> time?
I usually do.
> Would you try to run 100 miles the first 24 hours?
Hahaha! Ahem.
> Would you go for 100, 200, or even 300 miles if it
> were mathematically possible as long as you
> maintained a certain pace?
Again, I'm not sure what you're getting at here.
People do bad math in their heads late at night and
when sleep deprived. I sure did at SF 24-hour, thinking
I was a good five or six miles ahead of where I
actually was at one point. When I checked it was a real
letdown. The thing to do, unless you're a contender for
a win, is to just keep going, and let the numbers be
what the numbers will be.
> How long after a 24, 48 or 72 hour race would you
> have to wait until doing another one?
One year. :-)
> How much damage could you do to your body during a
> 24, 48, or 72 hour race?
People can die. Be careful out there. Running one of
these events is not a trivial thing.
> Anyone have any good stories out there?
Yes!