Prototype Save File

[Dot Liljenquist]

InMongoose, the term "Model" refers to subclasses of the mongoose.Modelclass. You should not use the mongoose.Model class directly. Themongoose.model() andconnection.model() functionscreate subclasses of mongoose.Model as shown below.

Sometimes you need to query for things in mongodb using a JavaScript expression. You can do so via find( $where: javascript ), or you can use the mongoose shortcut method $where via a Query chain or from your mongoose Model.

Sends multiple insertOne, updateOne, updateMany, replaceOne,deleteOne, and/or deleteMany operations to the MongoDB server in onecommand. This is faster than sending multiple independent operations (e.g.if you use create()) because with bulkWrite() there is only one roundtrip to MongoDB.

Mongoose will perform casting on all operations you provide.The only exception is setting the update operator for updateOne or updateMany to a pipeline: Mongoose does not cast update pipelines.

If you want to count all documents in a large collection,use the estimatedDocumentCount() functioninstead. If you call countDocuments(), MongoDB will always executea full collection scan and not use any indexes.

Create the collection for this model. By default, if no indexes are specified,mongoose will not create the collection for the model until any documents arecreated. Use this method to create the collection explicitly.

Deletes all of the documents that match conditions from the collection.It returns an object with the property deletedCount containing the number of documents deleted.Behaves like remove(), but deletes all documents that match conditionsregardless of the single option.

Deletes the first document that matches conditions from the collection.It returns an object with the property deletedCount indicating how many documents were deleted.Behaves like remove(), but deletes at most one document regardless of thesingle option.

Estimates the number of documents in the MongoDB collection. Faster thanusing countDocuments() for large collections becauseestimatedDocumentCount() uses collection metadata rather than scanningthe entire collection.

Note: conditions is optional, and if conditions is null or undefined,mongoose will send an empty findOne command to MongoDB, which will returnan arbitrary document. If you're querying by _id, use findById() instead.

Finds a matching document, updates it according to the update arg, passing any options, and returns the found document (if any) to the callback. The query executes if callback is passed else a Query object is returned.

However, you may need to call init() to get back a promise that will resolve when your indexes are finished.Calling await Model.init() is helpful if you need to wait for indexes to build before continuing.For example, if you want to wait for unique indexes to build before continuing with a test case.

Shortcut for validating an array of documents and inserting them intoMongoDB if they're all valid. This function is faster than .create()because it only sends one operation to the server, rather than one for eachdocument.

Mongoose always validates each document before sending insertManyto MongoDB. So if one document has a validation error, no documents willbe saved, unless you setthe ordered option to false.

The collection instance this model uses.A Mongoose collection is a thin wrapper around a [MongoDB Node.js driver collection](MongoDB Node.js driver collection).Using Model.collection means you bypass Mongoose middleware, validation, and casting.

Apply changes made to this model's schema after this model was compiled.By default, adding virtuals and other properties to a schema after the model is compiled does nothing.Call this function to apply virtuals and properties that were added later.

Makes the indexes in MongoDB match the indexes defined in this model'sschema. This function will drop any indexes that are not defined inthe model's schema except the _id index, and build any indexes thatare in your schema but not in MongoDB.

You should be careful about running syncIndexes() on production applications under heavy load,because index builds are expensive operations, and unexpected index drops can lead to degradedperformance. Before running syncIndexes(), you can use the diffIndexes() functionto check what indexes syncIndexes() will drop and create.

By default, translateAliases() overwrites raw fields with aliased fields.So if n is an alias for name, n: 'alias', name: 'raw' will resolve to name: 'alias' .However, you can set the errorOnDuplicates option to throw an error if there are potentially conflicting paths.The translateAliases option for queries uses errorOnDuplicates.

I appreciate that the design specs feature sort of allows this, in that you can see see all artboards, and focusing on one will sort of show the linking arrows (albeit in a not very clear or user-friendly way) but this request is different to that... -adobe-xd-feature-requests/suggestions/12927024-export-overview-of-all-artboards-showing-interact (this feature was never truly realised despite being marked as complete - if you look at the example images this sort of behaviour is not present in design specs currently)

Improving on the initial idea, so some simple artboard "auto-aligning" based on the relationships that have been set up using the prototype mode would be a great option, as would some control over the arrows styles/colors... but essentially a basic, non-iteractive, single export document that displays the linking arrows and artboard labels is the idea.

There is a plugin called Overflow ( ) which can do this for XD users, but I could never set it up. I contacted Overflow's support team to see if they could figure out the issue and they were never able to simulate the problem that I was facing so I am not sure if Overflow works or not. Might be worth a go for anyone looking for create what Jon B is requesting.

I have created a working prototype for an app and the clients want to see the flow diagram with linking arrows. It would be great if I can just press an export button that produces a huge PDF file with all the artboards and linking arrows, as Jon B describes above.

This is a feature that would really improve team collaboration! Clicking through a prototype is good but you need to have an overview. Now I type headline of each page large, then make a screen dumpand import in illustrator to make draw all lines between pages. A lot of extra work and I have to redo it after every change. A AI user flow feature would certainly make my work much easier and faster! Thanks! And I love most Adobe products.

A tab on the top could give us access to the user-flow feature (Design / Prototype / User-flow). It would help me save time to be able to map them directly inside Adobe XD instead of using other tools to do it.

It would be extremely useful to be able to export the entire prototype as a vector image showing the connections between each board. Potentially morphing into a cleaner storyboard or flowchart would also work well.

But the arrows could do with some improvements to how they are shown in this context as they tend to overlap and become confusing. Consider using little bridge-like "hop over" styling for where arrow lines cross over.

Also I see that the plugin API will soon support retrieving details of these linkages... it means there could be an option for a plugin to do this (I've started looking into it, but I'm not sure my attempt at a plugin would come close to what could be achieved as a feature within the product)

All of your personal information, including email address, name, and IP address will be deleted from this site. Any feedback you have provided that others have supported will be attributed to "Anonymous". All of your ideas without support will be deleted.

We often advocate using a parallel and iterative design process to explore design diversity, because it produces much better user experiences. A cheap way of implementing this type of design process is rapid paper prototyping. Paper prototyping is not only efficient for progressing designs quickly and allowing designers to find their best-of-breed with minimal investment, but it is also fast, fun, and easy to learn.

In this article we show how Mozilla used paper prototyping as well as user research and data mining to quickly advance the UX-focused redesign of a major part of its website. (A previous article documented how this redesign had high return on investment.)

If anybody says that design iterations will break your ship schedule or that user testing is too much bother, point them to this article, because some of the prototypes progressed through 7 versions during 2 weeks. Testing with users before even breaking out the HTML editor was cheap and it showed which alternative designs worked best.

Product-help landing pages were the top entry points for the support website, because they were accessed via the Help menu in the products. As the most-viewed page on the support website, the Firefox Help landing page pointed to a lot of useful information, but, with this design, too many people ended up in the forum asking questions. More than 30 articles were linked from the homepage, but when someone wanted information on a problem not listed, searching was the only way to find it. Instead, users needed to be able to choose a path related to their issues and find the few articles applicable to them.

Although there is no single answer to the question of flat vs. deep hierarchies, our many years of usability research indicate that with too many choices, people easily get overwhelmed. When people click the right thing first, they are almost 3 times as likely to succeed at their task.

The designer made the prototypes using OmniGraffle, and we printed them onto tabloid paper and cut them to size. Because there was no code to change, this prototyping method allowed us to make design changes quickly during testing. Firefox users helped progress the designs rapidly toward better usability, by allowing us to watch them try to find answers to top questions. Where they got stuck or confused, we redesigned.

3a8082e126