To view this e-mail as a web page, go here |
ADVERTISEMENT |

|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
The Public Policy Debate Over Unleashing the Dogs of Cyberwar
At the end of May, the Flame virus, suspected to be a weapon in a heretofore undeclared cyberwar, was discovered by computer security experts. Barely a week later, the U.S. government acknowledged responsibility for the Stuxnet worm, another sophisticated piece of malware that was discovered in 2010. Stuxnet’s principal aim: to deal a significant blow to Iran’s uranium enrichment program. This revelation has led to the inevitable question of whether engaging in a coordinated program of cyberattacks will serve as an open invitation to others to do the same. And will it undermine any complaints the U.S. has against others, especially China, for similar attacks against U.S. businesses or government organizations? In an article in ComputerWorld, for example, several security experts concluded that the United States, having kicked off its cover of plausible deniability, has “painted a huge target on [its] back.”
|
|
ADVERTISEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ADVERTISEMENT |
|
|
|
|
CONNECT WITH US: |
 |
|
This email was sent by IEEE | 3 Park Avenue New York, NY 10016 USA | UNSUBSCRIBE | ADVERTISE
© 2012 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this Web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions. |
|