Fwd: Re: IT:-Yahoo Group-Email:- Fwd: Judgement of Honable Supreme Court on the issue of prosecution u/s 276CC in favour of the Revenue

3 views
Skip to first unread message

S SRINIVAS

unread,
Jul 15, 2014, 2:16:43 PM7/15/14
to ACIT...@googlegroups.com


with regards,
S Srinivas, ADIT

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "S SRINIVAS" <ssva...@gmail.com>
Date: 15 Jul 2014 23:46
Subject: Re: IT:-Yahoo Group-Email:- Fwd: Judgement of Honable Supreme Court on the issue of prosecution u/s 276CC in favour of the Revenue
To: <it...@yahoogroups.com>
Cc:

This case relates to Jayalalitha and Sasikala. Interesting to read.

with regards,
S Srinivas, ADIT

On 15 Jul 2014 12:31, "Pavan Singla singl...@gmail.com [itgoa]" <it...@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 

This case is related to jaylaitha.old judgement.


On 14 July 2014 21:39, dharam vir dvsee...@gmail.com [itgoa] <it...@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
[Attachment(s) from dharam vir included below]

Subject: Judgement of Honable Supreme Court on the issue of
prosecution u/s 276CC in favour of the Revenue

IT: Benefit of proviso to section 276CC is available only to voluntary
filing of return as required under Section 139(1) and said proviso
would not apply after detection of failure to file return and after a
notice under section 142(1)(i) or section 148 is issued calling for
filing of return of income.

IT: Pendency of appellate proceedings relating to assessment is not a
bar for initiating prosecution proceedings under section 276CC.

IT: A firm is independently required to file return of income and
merely because partners of firm in their individual returns disclosed
that no return has been filed by firm due to non-finalisation of books
of account, would not nullify liability of firm to file its return as
per section 139(1).

IT: In term of provisions of section 278E, as regards prosecution of
offence like section 276CC, Court has to presume existence of mens rea
and it is for accused to prove contrary and that too beyond reasonable
doubt.

[2014] 41 taxmann.com 500 (SC) SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Sasi Enterprises v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax* Judgement
enclosed in Annexure.
Dharam Vir ACIT




--
Regards,

Pawan Singla , LLB
M. No. 9825829075

__._,_.___

Posted by: Pavan Singla <singl...@gmail.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (2)
Dear Friend,

You received this message because your mail address is in the mailing list of the ITGOA Yahoo! group. Here it is intended that the various issues is discussed among the members of Association. As well the information also is passed on. So, all the relevant information including DPC , Strike, etc..  passed to all the members. Not only the service related matters but the work related information may also be passed on. (like “let’s share). Even this group can be a meeting point for solving the various issue , like how such deduction is allowable or not?, What to do in certain situation etc.. So, dear member I also request you to forward this mail to our college so he also can be a member of this group and take advantages of having the information. To become a member just send mail to itgoa-s...@yahoogroups.com. In case if you want to send any information, or query send messages to it...@yahoogroups.com, this will send all the messages to all the members of this group.

R. R Makwana
9477331123 (West Bengal)

NOTE : Please keep in mind that this is group message and the email send is by the member, I am not subscribe the view expressed in the email, but the sender only. I personally do not take any responsibility of whatever stated in the mail by the members. Though, it is intended that each one can express their view. I may not agree / disagree with the views expressed by the others. Still members are requested to send the informative email, than pin political / biased views.]

.

__,_._,___
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages