Yes, I agree. Us smaller group who convened after the meeting to help write up conclusions in a letter (also Simon P, and Rachel B and Sarah C) haven't had much time to be very attentive to things online... Neither wrt the site nor to this list - apologies for that.
For me, Andrew Nairne's response brought so little new, unscripted and different from what one can read anywhere in existing strategy documents that, while it's nice to see him/them reiterate a general principle of commitment to creative practice and all things uncontroversial, it just seemed that putting more energy in to debate and engagement with ACE's official 'voices' - when so little critical intensity and rigour is brought to the party from their side - was not, err, very appealing - or productive.
I'm sure all of us will have learned from it though, and have smaller, perhaps more and less visible, debates, and in time may have these surface here and on coda2coda - and even, let's hope, official policy or, god forbid, actual funding decisons (!).
I'm also happy to help put up links etc.
Pauline
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device