Hi everyone,
I see many people have joined the discussion list since I posted my introductory message yesterday.
The list is also very quiet since we started, so I thought I should re-post my introduction to encourage people to begin debating some of the issues it raises. Please do contribute, as the forum can only work as an online discussion
First, let me outline our understanding of the concept of OER, as this is critical when considering the capacity-building challenges and issues. In a nutshell, the concept of OER describes educational resources that are freely available for use by educators and learners, without an accompanying need to pay royalties or licence fees. A broad spectrum of licensing frameworks is emerging to govern how OERs are licensed for use, some of which simply allow copying, others of which make provision for users to adapt the resources that they use.
Why is the concept of OER so potentially powerful?
1. Because OER removes restrictions around copying resources, it holds potential for reducing the cost of accessing educational materials over time, provided judicious investments are made in producing and sharing high quality, well designed resources.
2. The principle of allowing adaptation of materials contributes to encouraging higher education students to be active participants in educational processes, whereby they learn by doing and creating, not just by passively reading and absorbing.
3. OER has the potential to build capacity in African countries by providing educators with access, at low or no cost, to the means of production to develop their competence in producing educational materials and completing the necessary instructional design to integrate such materials into high quality programmes of learning.
The last point is the most important for this discussion, as it suggests to me that there are really two fundamental questions to consider when thinking about capacity-building and OER:
1. What capacity do we need to build to enable higher education institutions, academics, and students to take advantage of OER?
This might include issues of raising awareness about the concept of OER itself, helping people to understand the licensing issues, supporting institutions to develop OER-friendly policies, and so on.
2. How can OER help to build stronger institutional capacity in African higher education?
For me, this issue is the really important one. Many people in the OER movement seem to be operating under the illusion that simply making content freely available for use and adaptation will magically improve higher education delivery in Africa. This simplistic position ignores the obvious reality that content is only one piece of the educational puzzle, and that effective use of educational content does demand good educators to facilitate the process. I find OER an exciting, but daunting, concept, because it provides us a structured opportunity to engage African higher education faculties in structured processes that will build their capacity to design and deliver high quality higher education programmes without increasing cost. Without this institutional capacity, OER will not be able to fulfil its transformative potential.
With this introduction in place, I suggest we begin discussion by focusing on the following initial questions. Please feel free to respond to any one of these initial questions to get the conversation going:
1. Why are you interested in OER? What do you and/or your institution hope to gain from engaging with the concept?
2. If you are from a higher education institution, is your institution (or any faculty within the institution) starting to invest in producing Open Educational Resources or using OER produced elsewhere? If so, is this process being used to build your institution’s/faculty’s capacity, what kinds of capacity are you trying to build, and what effect is that having? If not, what needs to be done to get your institution to engage in OER?
3. What kinds of capacity-building interventions do we need to consider to persuade institutions to implement OER-friendly policies?
I look forward to hearing people’s responses to these questions, as well as any thoughts you might have on the issues raised in this introductory posting. Please feel free to share links in your responses to documents available on the Internet that you think people might find interesting.
Let’s get the discussion going!!!
Neil
--
Quality is not an act, It's a Habit!
...........................................................
Felix Kayode Olakulehin
Research Fellow
Regional Training and Research Institute for Open and Distance Learning
National Open University of Nigeria
14/16 Ahmadu Bello Way, Victoria Island
Lagos - Nigeria
+234-805-544-7164
folak...@nou.edu.ng, felix...@gmail.com
...........................................................
---------------------------------------------------------
RETRIDAL is an International Training & Research Institute
co-established by the National Open University of Nigeria and The
Commonwealth of Learning (COL) to develop a strong corps of experts in
various areas of Open and Distance Learning (ODL) within the West
African sub-region.
Let me try to provide a few tentative responses to some of them.
Regarding the issue of awareness, I think it is clear that very few
universities are aware of OER and its potential benefits. At the Faculty or
staff level, therefore, I think the level of knowledge is likely even to be
lower. Thus, a major component initially of capacity-building efforts will
be to raise awareness about and advocate for the use of OER
I think the problem of 'belief' in use of OER is a fundamental barrier to be
overcome, both globally and within Africa. Although, within Africa, there is
some culture of sharing, I think this is eclipsed by the publish-or-perish
mentality mentioned by Tunde. This is one of the major difficulties with
innovations such as this - as they run against the grain of established
practice, their adoption is problematic even if they are rational and make
economic sense.
It is great to hear form Felix a bit more about capacity-building efforts in
technology use at NOUN. It is worth pointing out, though, that better use of
technology does not necessarily translate into greater openness in licensing
regimes within an institution. I am interested to find out: Have you also
run capacity-building workshops at NOUN on licensing policies and are there
any moves afoot yet to introduce open licensing regimes within the
institution? I think the distance education institutions have a major role
to pay in fostering and advancing the concept of OER.
Regarding issues of quality, these should - I believe - be tackled in the
same sorts of ways as one approaches quality of any learning materials.
First, we must ensure that investment is made in producing high quality OER,
otherwise we must expect that while some resources may be open they are
likely to be of dubious quality. This needs to be a collaborative effort if
we are to create a critical mass of high quality, shareable educational
material. Second, we should use the same established criteria for judging
quality as have been developed for any kinds of material. A quick Internet
search will yield many frameworks for assessing quality of educational
materials.
What do others feel about the issues raised by Tunde and Felix?
Regards
Neil
regards,
Hi everyone,
It is wonderful to see the conversation picking up and to hear the perspectives of so many different people.
There are some really important points being made, which I hope we will continue.
I would like to note a few conceptual issues:
1. OER is not only relevant in ODL, although I believe it has great potential in that field. What is important though is to make sure we do not mix up the challenges of delivering ODL with the challenges of creating open resources.
2. OER does not have to involve e-learning. Printed materials could be made available under an open license and then distributed to learners using conventional distance education methods. However, I do think it is true that, for institutions to participate in, and benefit from OER, they do need to be able to connect to the Internet to find and download materials and participate in OER communities of practice. Elvis has raised this concern very well.
We know there are many challenges with ICT use in African higher education. However, sometimes I fear we become bogged down in worrying about the problems rather than focusing on doing the best we can with what we have available. I think OER helps us to take a more constructive approach, as it enables us to share Intellectual Property to the benefit of all.
It was great to read form Felix about the capacity-building work at NOUN on OER. Do people from other institutions have similar experiences to share?
Regards
Neil
Telephone: + 91-40-2368 0344
Dear All,
My name is Adewale Adesina I work at the Computing and Networking Services Directorate of the National Open University of Nigeria. My contact with OERs was at the first International Conference on ICT for Development and Training in Ethiopia at a workshop organized by the African Virtual University on OER’s (2006) . Since then I have been interested in the potentials of OER’s in developing capacity in Africa without having to reinvent the wheel.
To my mind a great benefit of OER may well be in the availability of quality and useable content in building human capacity in the area of computer literacy. Lack of computer literacy is a barrier and hinders people from making the best of technological resources for teaching and learning purposes. With OER’s, quality materials that can aid the development of rich computing skills can be made accessible for use and improvement on regular basis at affordable cost.
An interesting perspective I ve gained from Neil is that OER’s does not have to be accessed through computers, the fact that it can be available in printed format means that organizations and universities can begin to tap into the recourses immediately. However we need to work at solving the problems of computing infrastructure, bandwidth, power and in some places adverse legislation. Having the right policies to guide can not be overstated. I believe this boils down to creating great awareness in institutions around Africa.
I am aware of the great benefits of Free / Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS) movement. NOUN has participated in many of such initiatives and uses open source tools. The philosophy that the resources can be available free and open and users can become active “resource” creators and that resources can be re-used and freely maintained is indeed a great one. What is also interesting is that there is a large support base, this means that it is sustainable.
May I suggest that we introduce some practical dimension to our discussions a lot of us may not be very familiar with OER’s and may miss the very salient issues that have been raised in the discussions. Can we see links to sites where OER’s are being utilized? I have read about the MIT open courseware initiative (http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/web/home/home/index.htm). For these discussions can we create a sample site for example in wiki educator and invite members to explore. Awareness may be the key to tapping into the great resources.
Regards
Hi everyone,
It is wonderful to see the conversation picking up and to hear the perspectives of so many different people.
There are some really important points being made, which I hope we will continue.
I would like to note a few conceptual issues:
1. OER is not only relevant in ODL, although I believe it has great potential in that field. What is important though is to make sure we do not mix up the challenges of delivering ODL with the challenges of creating open resources.
2. OER does not have to involve e-learning. Printed materials could be made available under an open license and then distributed to learners using conventional distance education methods. However, I do think it is true that, for institutions to participate in, and benefit from OER, they do need to be able to connect to the Internet to find and download materials and participate in OER communities of practice. Elvis has raised this concern very well.
We know there are many challenges with ICT use in African higher education. However, sometimes I fear we become bogged down in worrying about the problems rather than focusing on doing the best we can with what we have available. I think OER helps us to take a more constructive approach, as it enables us to share Intellectual Property to the benefit of all.
It was great to read form Felix about the capacity-building work at NOUN on OER. Do people from other institutions have similar experiences to share?
Regards
Neil
From: acde-2008-onlin...@googlegroups.com [mailto:acde-2008-onlin...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Dr. Sunday A. Reju
Sent: 06 June 2008 01:43 AM
Hello Forum Participants,
I am Ayanniyi ALHASSAN. I work with the School of Education in the National Open University of Nigeria (NOUN).
I find the information to date on OER refreshing, stimulating and potentially beneficial to Open and Distance Learners, and building stronger institutional capacity in African higher education, given the continents’ infrastructural challenges.
The more pressing challenge for the Forum is to generate strategies for policy and practice towards realising the potential gains of OER both in the short and long term.
Thanks.
Dear All,
My name is Adewale Adesina I work at the Computing and Networking Services Directorate of the National Open University of Nigeria. My contact with OERs was at the first International Conference on ICT for Development and Training in Ethiopia at a workshop organized by the African Virtual University on OER?s (2006) . Since then I have been interested in the potentials of OER?s in developing capacity in Africa without having to reinvent the wheel.
To my mind a great benefit of OER may well be in the availability of quality and useable content in building human capacity in the area of computer literacy. Lack of computer literacy is a barrier and hinders people from making the best of technological resources for teaching and learning purposes. With OER?s, quality materials that can aid the development of rich computing skills can be made accessible for use and improvement on regular basis at affordable cost.
An interesting perspective I ve gained from Neil is that OER?s does not have to be accessed through computers, the fact that it can be available in printed format means that organizations and universities can begin to tap into the recourses immediately. However we need to work at solving the problems of computing infrastructure, bandwidth, power and in some places adverse legislation. Having the right policies to guide can not be overstated. I believe this boils down to creating great awareness in institutions around Africa.
I am aware of the great benefits of Free / Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS) movement. NOUN has participated in many of such initiatives and uses open source tools. The philosophy that the resources can be available free and open and users can become active ?resource? creators and that resources can be re-used and freely maintained is indeed a great one. What is also interesting is that there is a large support base, this means that it is sustainable.
May I suggest that we introduce some practical dimension to our discussions a lot of us may not be very familiar with OER?s and may miss the very salient issues that have been raised in the discussions. Can we see links to sites where OER?s are being utilized? I have read about the MIT open courseware initiative (http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/web/home/home/index.htm). For these discussions can we create a sample site for example in wiki educator and invite members to explore. Awareness may be the key to tapping into the great resources.
I like the issue being stressed by Adewale about the use of print
based open educational resources. This will enable many who have
limited access to internet connection to access OER. Another approach
which I think is likely to be more effective - and since we are
talking of sustainability of OERs - is the use of CD ROMs distribute
open content. This has the advantage of distributing a large number of
resources than is likely to be distributable in print version. Though,
this will make the resources available only in asynchronous format,
but the issue of internet restrictions may be minimized.
However, I have not heard anything being said about strategies for
making participation in OER development gainful to younger academics
amidst the 'publish or persih' ethos which characterises our higher
educational environment.
This issue has been raised by Prof Ipaye and Dr Reju and also alluded
to by nEil, but responses are not forthcoming. How are people in the
other societies able to overcome this challenge?
Best,
I am Ayanniyi ALHASSAN. I work with the School of Education in the
National Open University of Nigeria (NOUN).
The impediments identified by Akin Adejimi are some of the continents’
infrastructural challenges to Open and Distance Learners as stated in my
earlier contribution. But we cannot wait until all these impediments are
removed: The ACDE Forum is on the right track – providing opportunity for
the generation and implementation of creative ideas towards building
stronger institutional capacity in African higher education.
Thanks.
Ayanniyi ALHASSAN
> The Nigeria?s National Universities Commission?s Virtual Institute for