Ross Watson
unread,Jul 1, 2013, 10:00:50 AM7/1/13Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to accursed-wo...@googlegroups.com
I'd like to propose something that builds on John's idea of the strategist.
What I'd like to introduce is another villain, but a relatable one. Accursed has the Witches and the Banes, who are these unrelenting forces of evil you don't really ever see becoming friends.
However, what if we did have another villain who you could see eventually swaying to your side?
What I am imagining is something like this:
Let's say we do have the "Knight of Honour" paladin-king, and let's say he has as his advisor the great strategist.
During the Final Battle with the Witches, the strategist realizes that the battle is doomed and he withdraws with lots of troops at the height of the conflict. The strategist knew all was lost anyway, but any survivors of that battle consider him a traitor.
The strategist, for his part, considers the Knight of Honour too concerned with glory rather than the survival of Morden.
At any rate, the Strategist took his men and his troops to Parnath and has taken over there as the center of a second resistance... one that is NOT friendly at all to the Order of the Penitent.
The Strategist sees the Order of the Pentitent as an enemy because, in his mind, they are like the Knight of Honour -- they get people killed by trying to inspire them to rise up against the witches.
Meanwhile, the Strategist is furiously trying to uncover weaknesses of the Witches, and he and his agents sometimes clash with groups of Accursed while on similar missions.
How's this sounding?