Re: Fwd: Vijay cc vs chicago all-star

[Sarti Krishnan]

Chirag

That information was passed on by Haris in a text message and I took his word for it.

Does there have to be a fight about EVERYTHING?  Even re bits and pieces of how information is passed?  For goodness sake after this season a new umpiring committee can be formed and everyone who has so much talking to do can step up and do the work.  Then I am sure you guys will be happy and at least stop the attacks.

We don't look for any kudos and awards from anyone but the least you can do is refrain from your attacks at every opportunity you get.

Please run the committee from next year.  You and a few others will be asked to join and run the committee and I hope that will put a stop to all the dissatisfaction everyone expresses year after year.

The rules are pretty clear. There is no need to comment.

On Sep 14, 2014 6:46 PM, "ChîRaG - KaAnChI™" <chir...@gmail.com> wrote:

It would be very nice if Mr Sarti who gets information from me about making a decision keeps me in the loop also as I was involved too on making the judgment .

Secondly the rule #13.9 is about D/L as it's specifically talking about D/L method in this rule.

So you mean to say if a team played with 10 players and chasing a total and their over ends before chasing still looses?

120/5 in 30
120/4 in 30 ( team chasing) ?

Any comments on above scenario?

We were already got messed up when D/L was introduced this year and we were the first team who got into a wrong decision for loosing. Haris Bhai would remember that.

Thanks

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "DEV PATEL" <dev...@gmail.com>
Date: Sep 11, 2014 1:42 AM
Subject: Fwd: Vijay cc vs chicago all-star
To: "Chirag Vaswani" <chir...@gmail.com>
Cc:

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Sarti Krishnan <sar...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 9:05 AM
Subject: Re: Vijay cc vs chicago all-star
To: haris imtiaz <haris...@hotmail.com>
Cc: Dev Patel Vijay <dev...@gmail.com>, Sohail Bari <dan...@aol.com>

Dev,

Chirag confirmed to the league that you guys played this match with 10 players so unless that information is incorrect, losing 9 wickets when a team is playing with 10 players is the same as losing 10 wickets.  So this match is a tie unless you can provide information to us proving that you played with 11 players.  Please see rule below from the rule book below related to this point.  Thanks

Rule # 13.9

IMPORTANT: If a team plays a match with less than 11 players, those players who are absent  from the match are automatically considered “Timed Out” and so they should be entered as WICKETS LOST...

On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 7:27 AM, haris imtiaz <haris...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Committee will announce the official result but it will be a tie game,

because vijay played with 10 players, and would get penalized for missing 11th player, sarti will explain the rule and verdict.

---

Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 22:31:48 -0500
Subject: Vijay cc vs chicago all-star
From: dev...@gmail.com
To: haris...@hotmail.com

Any updates for result ?

--
- Sarti