Chicago Fire vs Naaz XI dispute - agreement requested

[Sarti Krishnan]

Harun and Siva,

The ACC Umpiring Committee has decided that the two teams should be presented with the following options.  Please let us know if you can agree on one of the options below within 24 hours (5:30 pm tomorrow deadline - Thursday)

If the two teams cannot agree to one of the options below then the committee will impose a verdict for this match.

We sincerely hope the two teams can come to an agreement here.  Thanks in advance

Your options:

BOTH teams must agree to one of the following three options - 

 

1. Split points

2. Replay the whole match (committee will approve a one-time exception for this to happen in September for this very special circumstance)

3. Replay the match starting with the second inning (there was too much chaos in the second inning so it would be unfair to ask Naaz XI to start playing from the 5th over - so they can chase whatever score that Chicago Fire had scored by playing the full second inning)  Note: With this option, both teams MUST play with the same roster as their disputed match (i.e, no changes in roster - if a player is not available for continuation of the 2nd inning then that team will play with less than 11 players - NO NEW players allowed in this match). 

--
- Sarti

[Siva Kesana]

Sarti,

Did umpire confirm you that he made this decision to split the points or declared it as a tie? In my knowledge he didn't do that on the field for sure. Please confirm.

Thanks

Siva

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 10, 2014, at 8:33 PM, Harun Polli <harun...@gmail.com> wrote:

Sarti,

Thank you so much for coming up with all possible option. I really appreciate and thank you so much for being fair and honest for both teams.

 

I am still stick with option 1 as umpire decided this decision as per ACC rule and regulation on the field.

So as we all know that the option 1 decision is already made by umpire and that's why Chicago fire complained about it. I try my best to prove that the allegation made by opponent team was totally false. The fact is that the ground was unplayable that's why the game rain out and point got split between both teams. As you mentioned before that Rizvi sahab talked to umpire as well to find out the truth and I am sure that Rizvi sahab got same info from umpire which I provided before. Thus, this is the reason committee decided to come with option 1 to split the point. So, once again I would like to stick with the decision which umpire made as per ACC rules which is option 1.

 

If committee will change the decision other than option 1 then what is the point for me to prove everything. I hope committee will understand what I am trying to explain and take the right decision as per ACC rules and regulation which can be example for ACC league in the future.

 

Please feel free to let me know if have question.

 

Thank you so much for your kind co-operation and try to resolve this issue in timely manner.

Harun Polli

--
Thanks and Regards,

Harun Polli

[Sarti Krishnan]

Siva,

Naaz XI has given option #1 as their choice.  Please give us your choice for Chicago Fire.  All other points are moot at this point in the process.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ACC Umpiring Committee" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to acc-umpiring-comm...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
- Sarti

[Siva Kesana]

By choosing option #3, I am giving a chance to everybody for being fair in this matter.

Thank you very much.

Siva

Sent from my iPhone

[Sarti Krishnan]

Ok, we don't have an agreement between the two teams.  I am going to make one final attempt to make a peace deal.

I'd like to call Harun first.  Harun can I call you and talk to you for 5 minutes now?  

Then Siva?