Hello, Tour de France Femmes Gamers!
STAGE Grade: B+
I rate today’s stage a B+.
The route was well-designed. That first climb didn’t break the peloton, but it eliminated the sprinters. I don’t think the course designer had an 88-kilometer solo win in mind, but it was the route that made it happen. I threw in a few stars to reward that solo win, plus all the stars for the surprise factor (“Sigi who?”).
Route: 4/5 GC: 1/5 Tactics: 4/5 Sprint: 1/5 Surprises: 5/5
Lorena Wiebes against everyone. It was clear early on that this time Wiebes lost. On the first category 1 climb she gave away two minutes. In the end she lost twenty. No doubt she didn’t try to compete for the stage win.
Instead we got an interesting breakaway. After the second climb, Lucinda Brand went on the attack, and a breakaway formed with eleven riders. I saw Célia Gery, as expected. I saw Lotte Kopecky. And I saw Sigrid Haugset, a rider I had never heard of.
That breakaway began the Col de la Sauvine with a lead of just fifteen seconds. The peloton apparently didn’t want the breakaway to win. Almost immediately, riders from the breakaway faltered and were caught by the peloton. Brand. Gery. Kopecky, one of the last riders to surrender.
But not Haugset. There were 88 kilometers to race and Haugset went solo. The predictable was: Haugset gets a small lead, then what’s left of the peloton gets organized and Marianne Vos wins the stage.
That didn’t happen. The unpredictable happened. Haugset was not going to get caught by the peloton. We know that now, we didn’t know it then. After ten kilometers of seeing the gap grow, Kopecky decided to make the jump to Haugset. The gap was a minute and a half.
For 75 kilometers, Kopecky would chase Haugset. Haugset is a time trial specialists, five times on the podium in the Norwegian national championship. And she’s the current road race national champion. Kopecky is two times the road race world champion and winner of a handful of Monuments of cycling.
Seventy-five kilometers, Kopecky chasing. For much of that time, the TV didn’t even show us the gap. Everyone still believed in the predictable. But the peloton was three, four minutes behind. They were mildly concerned with each other — there were a few accelerations by Kim Le Court-Pienaar and Demi Vollering. But mostly, they didn’t care at all. The race was ahead, between Kopecky and Haugset.
A minute, sometimes more, sometimes less. For 60 kilometers, Kopecky was chasing, trailing by a minute. Then the gap came down very quickly. Thirty, twenty, fifteen. We saw Haugset: pedaling squares. Cramps, I thought. We had seen Kopecky drinking from time to time, but not Haugset. Would the less experienced Haugset lose the race because she forgot to drink?
I thought: why doesn’t she just wait for Kopecky. Recharge. Let the peloton come a little closer. Drop her with four kilometers to go. Haugset told us afterwards that she had considered that. But she didn’t do it. Instead, she kept pedaling.
With ten kilometers to go: ten seconds. Then ten seconds. Then ten seconds. Kopecky could almost reach out and grab her. An uncategorized climb appeared, 7% for a while. Haugset struggling, she barely seemed to be moving. But: if one rider is struggling, the chaser is also struggling.
Kopecky was struggling. Eight kilometers to go, the gap became fifteen seconds. Still, Kopecky could see Haugset. The predictable could still happen. But fifteen became 30, and more. It turns out Kopecky was the one with leg cramps.
The unpredictable happened. Sigfrid Ytterhus Haugset won her second mass start pro cycling race of her career. We’ve all heard of her now. Eighty-eight kilometers solo, I don’t recall the last time we’ve seen that in a women’s race. Liz Deignan in 2021 was “forever the first ever” winner of Paris-Roubaix after 81 kilometers solo. Annemiek van Vleuten won stage 7 of the 2022 Tour after 62 kilometers solo. Eighty-eight kilometers was not predicted and something we must savor.
There was a smaller peloton chasing Haugset and Kopecky, including most but not all the general classification contenders. Among them Émilie Morier and Solène Muller, from our focus team St Michel – Preference Home – Auber93.
Muller eventually dropped out of that peloton and finished 53rd, more than six minutes behind. But Morier finished with the GC contenders, 22nd. So that’s our team’s strategy: Morier in the top-20 of the general classification.
Morier is the current French individual time trial champion and guess what: stage 4 is the individual time trial. A critical day for our team.
Watch the final kilometer HERE
Watch the post-race interview with Haugset HERE (don’t cry)
Watch NBC Sports’ Extended highlights HERE
Read the TNT Sports report HERE
Spoiler alert: there were no changes in the standings today.
Team Ansel took all the prizes today. Most points from the stage, most points from classifications, most points overall, most riders in the Top-25 (eleven). This may be a Pogačar kind of game if they keep it up like this.
Team Hugo and Team Tadej made it more exciting by finishing second and third, respectively, within a single point.
The rest of the teams missed the boat today. Team Amalia in fourth, Team Wesley in fifth, and Team Katja shared sixth with Team Cameron.
Stage 4 on Tuesday is the inevitable time trial. If you brought Zoe Bäckstedt on your team then this is the day you were waiting for. She’ll be on the podium, for sure. Demi Vollering will try to make a move in the general classification. But ahead of both of them we expect Marlen Reusser. No doubt about it, Reusser will win stage 4.
Standings after stage 3:
|
Rank |
Name |
Points |
WAS |
MOVES |
|
1 |
Team Ansel* |
713 |
1 |
0 |
|
2 |
Team Tadej* |
659 |
2 |
0 |
|
3 |
Team Hugo* |
600 |
3 |
0 |
|
4 |
Team Amalia* |
460 |
4 |
0 |
|
5 |
Team Katja* |
366 |
5 |
0 |
|
6 |
Team Cameron* |
307 |
6 |
0 |
|
7 |
Team Wesley* |
202 |
7 |
0 |
Standings after stage 3 (including adults):
|
Rank |
Name |
Points |
WAS |
MOVES |
|
1 |
Team Jake |
749 |
1 |
0 |
|
2 |
Team Catherine |
725 |
7 |
5 |
|
3 |
Team Ansel* |
713 |
3 |
0 |
|
4 |
Team Kent |
710 |
4 |
0 |
|
5 |
Team Laurens |
706 |
6 |
1 |
|
Team Melanie |
706 |
4 |
-1 |
|
|
7 |
Team Cameron |
699 |
8 |
1 |
|
8 |
Team Valerie |
671 |
2 |
-6 |
|
9 |
Team Amelia |
661 |
14 |
5 |
|
10 |
Team Tadej* |
659 |
9 |
-1 |
|
11 |
Team Allison |
658 |
15 |
4 |
|
12 |
Team Craig |
650 |
11 |
-1 |
|
13 |
Team Sam |
646 |
13 |
0 |
|
14 |
Team Kari |
633 |
12 |
-2 |
|
15 |
Team Charlotte |
621 |
9 |
-6 |
|
16 |
Team Erin |
602 |
22 |
6 |
|
17 |
Team Hugo* |
600 |
17 |
0 |
|
18 |
Team Lichterman |
598 |
16 |
-2 |
|
19 |
Team Doug |
580 |
21 |
2 |
|
20 |
Team Andrew |
577 |
18 |
-2 |
|
21 |
Team Adam |
558 |
20 |
-1 |
|
22 |
Team Ellie |
557 |
19 |
-3 |
|
23 |
Team Wesley |
538 |
23 |
0 |
|
24 |
Team Kate |
533 |
26 |
2 |
|
25 |
Team Julie |
524 |
24 |
-1 |
|
26 |
Team Grace |
505 |
25 |
-1 |
|
27 |
Team Suzanne |
474 |
29 |
2 |
|
28 |
Team Amalia* |
460 |
27 |
-1 |
|
29 |
Team Corsa |
411 |
28 |
-1 |
|
30 |
Team Karin |
397 |
32 |
2 |
|
31 |
Team Katja* |
366 |
30 |
-1 |
|
32 |
Team Allie |
345 |
31 |
-1 |
|
33 |
Team Cameron* |
307 |
33 |
0 |
|
34 |
Team Ellen |
230 |
34 |
0 |
|
35 |
Team Wesley* |
202 |
35 |
0 |
Complete breakdown of points from stage 3:
|
STAGE RESULTS |
YELLOW JERSEY |
GREEN JERSEY |
POLKA DOT JERSEY |
WHITE JERSEY |
POINTS/CLASS |
TOTAL |
PREVIOUS |
CUM. TOTAL |
|
|
Team Amalia* |
76 |
9 |
7 |
0 |
5 |
21 |
97 |
363 |
460 |
|
Team Ansel* |
145 |
23 |
8 |
5 |
12 |
48 |
193 |
520 |
713 |
|
Team Cameron* |
65 |
9 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
79 |
228 |
307 |
|
Team Hugo* |
124 |
23 |
8 |
5 |
8 |
44 |
168 |
432 |
600 |
|
Team Katja* |
54 |
9 |
7 |
5 |
4 |
25 |
79 |
287 |
366 |
|
Team Tadej* |
122 |
23 |
8 |
5 |
9 |
45 |
167 |
492 |
659 |
|
Team Wesley* |
62 |
10 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
24 |
86 |
116 |
202 |
Complete breakdown of points from stage 3 (including adults):
|
111 |
23 |
8 |
0 |
5 |
36 |
147 |
411 |
558 |
|
|
Team Allie |
57 |
8 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
70 |
275 |
345 |
|
Team Allison |
156 |
27 |
8 |
5 |
5 |
45 |
201 |
457 |
658 |
|
Team Amalia* |
76 |
9 |
7 |
0 |
5 |
21 |
97 |
363 |
460 |
|
Team Amelia |
150 |
27 |
8 |
5 |
10 |
50 |
200 |
461 |
661 |
|
Team Andrew |
109 |
23 |
8 |
0 |
9 |
40 |
149 |
428 |
577 |
|
Team Ansel* |
145 |
23 |
8 |
5 |
12 |
48 |
193 |
520 |
713 |
|
Team Cameron |
156 |
27 |
8 |
5 |
5 |
45 |
201 |
498 |
699 |
|
Team Cameron* |
65 |
9 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
79 |
228 |
307 |
|
Team Catherine |
167 |
31 |
11 |
5 |
8 |
55 |
222 |
503 |
725 |
|
Team Charlotte |
97 |
11 |
9 |
5 |
7 |
32 |
129 |
492 |
621 |
|
Team Corsa |
51 |
9 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
67 |
344 |
411 |
|
Team Craig |
139 |
20 |
7 |
5 |
8 |
40 |
179 |
471 |
650 |
|
Team Doug |
137 |
23 |
8 |
0 |
5 |
36 |
173 |
407 |
580 |
|
Team Ellen |
47 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
4 |
9 |
56 |
174 |
230 |
|
Team Ellie |
106 |
17 |
7 |
5 |
8 |
37 |
143 |
414 |
557 |
|
Team Erin |
158 |
32 |
6 |
0 |
9 |
47 |
205 |
397 |
602 |
|
Team Grace |
100 |
17 |
7 |
5 |
5 |
34 |
134 |
371 |
505 |
|
Team Hugo* |
124 |
23 |
8 |
5 |
8 |
44 |
168 |
432 |
600 |
|
Team Jake |
166 |
32 |
11 |
5 |
10 |
58 |
224 |
525 |
749 |
|
Team Julie |
114 |
21 |
7 |
5 |
4 |
37 |
151 |
373 |
524 |
|
Team Kari |
123 |
23 |
8 |
5 |
5 |
41 |
164 |
469 |
633 |
|
Team Karin |
127 |
21 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
33 |
160 |
237 |
397 |
|
Team Kate |
128 |
26 |
3 |
5 |
3 |
37 |
165 |
368 |
533 |
|
Team Katja* |
54 |
9 |
7 |
5 |
4 |
25 |
79 |
287 |
366 |
|
Team Kent |
152 |
26 |
8 |
0 |
8 |
42 |
194 |
516 |
710 |
|
Team Laurens |
146 |
26 |
8 |
5 |
8 |
47 |
193 |
513 |
706 |
|
Team Lichterman |
117 |
23 |
8 |
5 |
0 |
36 |
153 |
445 |
598 |
|
Team Melanie |
138 |
28 |
11 |
5 |
8 |
52 |
190 |
516 |
706 |
|
Team Sam |
134 |
26 |
8 |
5 |
5 |
44 |
178 |
468 |
646 |
|
Team Suzanne |
100 |
17 |
7 |
5 |
8 |
37 |
137 |
337 |
474 |
|
Team Tadej* |
122 |
23 |
8 |
5 |
9 |
45 |
167 |
492 |
659 |
|
Team Valerie |
115 |
17 |
6 |
5 |
5 |
33 |
148 |
523 |
671 |
|
Team Wesley |
111 |
23 |
8 |
5 |
0 |
36 |
147 |
391 |
538 |
|
Team Wesley* |
62 |
10 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
24 |
86 |
116 |
202 |
Vive le Tour Femmes!
-Laurens.