I watched it last night. The story centers around a brave teenage girl who sues her rapist who, it turns out, had shared images online and is eventually outed by Anonymous. The only direct reference to Aaron comes in the first 4 minutes (see below), but the themes of idealism vs "realism" are woven throughout. Towards the end, the lawsuit against prosecutorial overcharge is briefly referenced again, with the law partners saying no to the case, which I assume means that that story line will be dropped, but perhaps not.
3:16
Lawyer A: Did something go wrong?
B: no, just a client who is idealistic
A: is that a bad thing?
B: no it just complicates things
A: how does it complicate things?
B: reality isn't idealistic, and when the two of them run into each other, only one gets hurt
A: maybe it will be reality this time
B: my guess is not. so, tell me about this class action
A: No, no, that's not a segway. Speaking of idealism--now there's a segway. Do you know who Aaron Swartz is?
B: The computer activist who died
A: The computer activist who committed suicide after an unrelenting campaign from federal prosecutors to imprison him. In his memory, I'm attempting to organize a class action against prosecutorial overcharging
B: and you want us to join this class action?
A: yes,
B: I'll run it by my partners, but they're not always into causes for causes' sake; they tend to want to see the.... [conversation is interrupted]
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:55 AM, Taren Stinebrickner-Kauffman
<tare...@gmail.com> wrote: