Skip to first unread message
Tux
May 18, 2012, 9:07:34 AM5/18/12
to a-simpl...@googlegroups.com
A valid proposal must include the word Proposal and the suggested Rule number in the Subject, as well as the proposal tag. Any is explanation text or discussion within the proposal must be in italics.
rockallnight
May 18, 2012, 10:33:18 AM5/18/12
to a-simpl...@googlegroups.com
Vote yes
While these simplified rules are nice, I think it's important to get organized before this really takes off. A standardized way to propose new rules and tag them properly is a good idea.
Tux
May 18, 2012, 10:39:52 AM5/18/12
to a-simpl...@googlegroups.com
A valid proposal must include the word Proposal and the suggested Rule number in the Subject, as well as the proposal tag. Any explanation text or discussion within the proposal must be in italics.
I have edited out the word "is" from initial proposal, this probably invalidates this proposal, but we have no rule that disqualifies it. I suspect that rockallnight probably still supports this in the new format, but for formality, I suggest you vote again.
rockallnight
May 18, 2012, 10:45:10 AM5/18/12
to a-simpl...@googlegroups.com
Vote recast: Yes
I don't see any rules against editing a proposal. Meaning wasn't changed.
Serengaeth
May 18, 2012, 11:00:08 AM5/18/12
to a-simpl...@googlegroups.com
I'd like to propose the following:
2.1: All rule-change proposals must be made as new posts to the "A Simple Nomic" Google Group.
2.2: A rule-change proposal must include the word "Proposal" and the suggested Rule Number in the subject line. The post must be tagged "Proposal".
2.3: The initial text of a rule-change proposal must be in a mono-spaced font.
2.4: Rule-change proposals that do not meet the requirements described in Rules 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3 are invalid and cannot be passed regardless of votes made for or against them.
But I'll agree to the wording as it is now, I just wanted to open up discussion!
Tux
May 18, 2012, 11:07:32 AM5/18/12
to a-simpl...@googlegroups.com
Fun to figure all this out and how to work the Google group to do what we want. OUCH THE GROWING PAINS!
I'm going to withdraw my proposal, in favor of Serengaeths proposal with some changes... how do we do that? :D
Tux
May 18, 2012, 11:08:10 AM5/18/12
to a-simpl...@googlegroups.com
WITHDRAWN
Serengaeth
May 18, 2012, 11:13:32 AM5/18/12
to a-simpl...@googlegroups.com
Go ahead and propose something new! Can't see that anything else needs to be done, we should probably work on rules (at some point) to officially close failed rule changes.
rockallnight
May 18, 2012, 12:48:08 PM5/18/12
to a-simpl...@googlegroups.com
What is the purpose of the mono-spaced font section? Just for continuity?
Serengaeth
May 18, 2012, 1:01:24 PM5/18/12
to a-simpl...@googlegroups.com
That was all I thought. I like monospaced fonts, they look litigious :)
rockallnight
May 18, 2012, 1:19:38 PM5/18/12
to a-simpl...@googlegroups.com
So this is being handled in a different thread now right?
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
This conversation is locked
You cannot reply and perform actions on locked conversations.
0 new messages