Fighting Cancer with Light
Tom
I thought about your mom when I read this article from Life Extension.
Apparently this is a more common technique they are using in Europe to
fight off skin and lung cancer:
It was good chatting with you last night.
Your friend,
-Tom
John Wright
I've never been real excited by any therapy that does collateral
damage like this. It's the basic problem with chemotherapy, you need
to balance good vs harm (although this light therapy is more targeted
than chemo). In the right situations such therapies can be very
valuable. Overall I'd prefer to see more emphasis on healthy
therapies that don't cause harm to non-cancer cells.
Thomas Anderson
I'm curious if these are some of the "creative ideas" you were talking about. Are there other good approaches for fighting cancer that the article didn't cover?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "A 2 G" group.
To post to this group, send email to a-...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to a-2-g+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/a-2-g?hl=en.
John Wright
approaches. All of those are excellent and should be considered by
anyone dealing with cancer or looking to prevent cancer.
A lot of the "creative ideas" I was referring to could be considered
part of the "natural chemotherapies" point. But by "creative" I was
meaning some of the less known techniques such as some of the "energy
medicine" machines, hyperthermia and such.
What's tough is defining "good approaches". Cancer is very complex
and difficult to deal with (basically because it's your own cells just
gone haywire). So when I look at something to decide if it's a "good
approach" I think about what potential harm a therapy might do and
basically prioritize in order of least risk of harm to most risk of
harm.