Fellow group members,
In my opinion, as it relates to Wikitree, there are two things needed:
1) A statement such as that found at
http://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Date_Fields#Julian_vs._Gregorian_Calendar,
possibly with a link to a more complete explanation of the topic.
2) A policy for dates such as 1 Jan 1718/19. Do we enter 1718 or 1719?
I disagree with Chris's statement to "use the standard that the person
themselves would have known and used." Here is why: people back then
knew what that meant, but people living now usually do not.
The date given was the marriage of Mary Nurse to Samuel Francis. Mary
Nurse was born Mary Eaton; her first husband Josiah Nurse (a grandson of
Rebecca Nurse, the condemned witch of Salem) died 4 Apr 1718.
People living then understood that April 1718 was almost a year before
Jan 1718. People living now do not get that, and so researchers have
said it must be a different Mary Nurse who married Samuel Francis.
So, I vote for a suggested Wikitree policy of using the later year for
these double dates, that is 1719 instead of 1718.
We all know (or at least everyone used to know) that George Washington
was born 22 Feb 1732. Is this Gregorian or Julian? For the first
twenty years of his life Washington thought he was born in 1731.
Anyone creating profile for Washington should really use 1732, since
that is what he thought after the age of 20, and that is what general
reference books have.
What Wikitree users do not have to think about at all is how the
differing dates relate to each other.
What does it matter if Shakespeare (Julian) or Cervantes (Gregorian)
died ten days before the other? Genealogists can write that both died
23 Apr 1616, and no one today need be concerned with the distinction,
except maybe an astrologer.
Kathy