David Sereda's proof of UFOs.
AntiMarxistFanboy
His wikipedia entry goes forth:
David B. Sereda, author, physicist, and ufologist born in Edmonton,
Alberta, Canada on August 21, 1961, became a permanent resident of the
United States of America with his family in 1964. He was raised in
Berkeley, CA. David Sereda's first aspiration in life was to become an
astronaut. He kept a scrapbook of every Apollo mission while growing up
in Berkeley and San Francisco, California in the 1960s. His interest in
space, religion, philosophy, astronomy and science led him on his
career in related fields.
Here's a true underated scientist. Almost no one at all as ever heard
of him. Maybe it's
'cause the scientific community wants to silence ufologist? It seems
so. Here is just a tibit of the evidence he has uncovered:
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4523/1268/1600/Zarquawi.UFO.jpg
"Is there an "orb" or UFO in the invisible infra-red, military bombing
video of the Zarquawi compound? We are all familiar with the orbs that
show up in crop circles, the soft fuzzy lights that zip around and move
about the circles. Is this one of them? It is clearly hovering above
the compound, somewhere in the airspace between the videographer in an
airplane, high altitude helicopter, or satellite?
I have always been interested in capturing UFOs in the "Invisible"
dimensions since I saw a metalic disc-shaped UFO disappear after
viewing it for over twnety minutes, in Berkeley, California, 1967-68.
While humans only see from red to violet wavelengths of light, many
video cameras, digital cameras and certain films can allow humans to
examine phenomena giivng off Infra-red and ultraviolet (Near, Far and
Extreme). The military and NASA use the kinds of cameras frequently for
specific reasons: they want to observe Stealth Capabilities of other
craft and UFOs!."
He goes on much further withen his documentary, Evidence: The case for
UFOs.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5070476612863849446&q=david+sereda&hl=en
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8524267568796529301&q=david+sereda&hl=en
Hold on to your seats, skeptics are going to become believers.
The Rat
> Maybe it's
> 'cause the scientific community wants to silence ufologist?
Yeah, sure. Listen up shit-for-brains; if anyone could prove that UFOs
were extraterrestrial spacecraft they would be celebrities, with all
the money and ass that brings. No scientist would bury information like
that, they would want a piece of it.
Sereda is just another huckster getting all he can out of the gullible.
Probably gets free rides to lectures, weekends in swank hotels, maybe a
few groupies. Nice work if you can get it....
...and you have no pride or shame.
TiradeFaction
> Maybe it's
> 'cause the scientific community wants to silence ufologist?
The scientific community doesn't need to silence dipshits like
ufologists, they make asses of themselves on their own (just like the
moon landing conspiracy theorists and Fred Phelps)
Also, the proven existence of extraterrestial life would give a lot of
scientists wet dreams, there's just none at the moment, especially not
for flying saucers!
LoreAlmighty
later antiintelligencenimrod.
Psycho Dave
extraterrestrial visitations.
I've seen this guy's bullshit debunked already. The things in the
videos from Nasa are pieces of space debris, ice that came off of the
spacecraft, and the alleged changes in trajectory are due to the firing
of the motion-control jets on the shuttle, which change the direction
and attitude of the shuttle. Anything in the backgroun looks like it's
moving in a different direction, because the shuttle is moving in a
different direction.
I'll bet this "scientist" of yours also claims that the lunar landings
were faked.
TiradeFaction
AntiMarxistFanboy
were faked. "
Psycho Dave, what do you mean by "scientist." Do you believe he's
making up his profession?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Sereda
No, I don't believe he believes the lunar landings are faked. I do
believe he once said they were done with alien technology, and not
human technology, which I am inclined to believe.
"I've seen this guy's bullshit debunked already. The things in the
videos from Nasa are pieces of space debris, ice that came off of the
spacecraft, and the alleged changes in trajectory are due to the firing
of the motion-control jets on the shuttle, which change the direction
and attitude of the shuttle. Anything in the backgroun looks like it's
moving in a different direction, because the shuttle is moving in a
different direction. "
This means that in NASA STS-75, when the video camera zooms in to get a
closer look at the tether, we see the tether getting thicker, not due
to the camera going out of focus as NASA Reported that the thickness of
the tether is due to sunlight reflecting off of the ionized nitrogen
gas surrounding the tether and or the energy field surrounding the
tether itself. The discs of light would not be there at all if they
were illuminated pieces of dust near the camera lens; having not been
able to visually survive in the focal plane of the video camera on the
long zoom inwards. The only way they would survive would be if they
were truly distant objects. The fact that the camera is in focus all
the way, means they are not distant stars in an out-of-focus state.
To help clarify certain issues about the NASA UFOs in both of my films,
"Dan Aykroyd, Unplugged on UFOs" and "Evidence, the Case for NASA
UFOs."
These are excerpts from my book, "Evidence, the Case for NASA UFOs"
which I hope will help clarify some of the arguments about UFOs
captured on Space Shuttle Video cameras, which I postulate are in the
invisible. I firstly base this upon my own seeing a UFO clear as day in
Berkeley, 1967-68 with several other agitated witnesses. We all watched
in utter amazement as this metallic, disc-shaped UFO hovered at about
3,500 feet in the clear blue sky not far from the Lawrence Berkeley
National Lab. After about twenty minutes, the UFO just blinked out and
went invisible. I have been interested in invisibility with regards to
UFOs ever since.
I have confirmed by letter that the above letter from NASA is true and
documented. later, James Oberg tried to say that the video cameras on
the shuttle were ordinary video cameras. He was uninformed or lying to
protect his UFO debunking theories. He was also firstly an employee at
NASA working under John F. Schuessler, whom is today the head of MUFON.
John F. Schuessler keeps accurate files of astronaut encounters of UFOs
and is a believer while Oberg is a debunker. Can you figure this one
out now?
AntiMarxistFanboy
TiradeFaction wrote:
> The video lost me when Dan Ackroyd said "extra dimensional species".
What? Don't all scientist believe certain things come from different
realities?
AntiMarxistFanboy
knows all this and they have video cameras aboard the Space Shuttles
and aboard satellites that can see into invisible spectra of light,
such as the infrared and the near ultraviolet. I confirmed the
wavelengths of the shuttles video cameras with NASA scientists back in
1998, Dr. Joseph Nuth, III, Head of Astrochemistry at the Goddard Space
Flight Center in Greenbelt, MD. He said that the shuttle's video
cameras could see near UV photons in a letter to me dated April 3,
2000: "Although the camera itself may respond to x-rays and gamma
rays (usually as noise), the optics do not serve to focus on anything
but visible and near-UV photons. I would be amazed if the optics were
not quartz so that the UV cut-off wavelength would be ~ 180 nm. If
sapphire the cut-off drops to 160 nm and for CaF2 the cut-off is ~ 135
nm." UV is divided into near, far and extreme. The near UV is higher
in wavelengths frequency than the color violet. It is also invisible to
the human eye and spans almost as wide as the visible light spectrum in
wavelengths. Many of NASAs video cameras see well into the invisible
Infra-red also. Infrared is lower in wavelength frequency than the
color red. Infrared is even easier than UV detection.
The Rat
> "I'll bet this "scientist" of yours also claims that the lunar landings
> were faked. "
>
>
>
> Psycho Dave, what do you mean by "scientist." Do you believe he's
> making up his profession?
>
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Sereda
Possibly, the Wiki entry doesn't mention where or how he got his
credentials. In any case credentials do not make one a scientist, they
only indicate that you did some science in order to get them. You see,
the word 'science' is a verb, not a noun. In order to be a 'scientist'
you must be actively engaged in scientific inquiry. If what you're
doing is unscientific (creation 'scientists' are perhaps the worst
offenders) then you are not a scientist.
The Rat
> Don't all scientist believe certain things come from different
> realities?
No. Where the fuck did you get that idea?
TiradeFaction
> Don't all scientist believe certain things come from different
> realities?
What the fuck are you talking about?
AntiMarxistFanboy
and pasted from David Sereda himself.
Do you have any proof he faked his credentials? Please give me some
pointers on how his ideas on UV light spectrums being involved with
UFOs are unscientific. Please show me how the footage he has is faked
or his edited. I think your making basless accusations.
The Rat
> Do you have any proof he faked his credentials?
Never said he did. Many people have legitimate degrees from acredited
universities and then go woo-woo on us.
LoreAlmighty
iraqi war footage was a UFO, he kind of lost all credibility with me.
I don't see how examining UV light spectrums will come up with UFO's,
or how a intersteller spaceship would have to be pure energy. If the
evidence is in UV, show me it. How come any joe shmoe with internet
access who could do research on UV lights find this evidence already.
Are ALL the scientist, government private and otherwise in the
conspriacy to hide this evidence? And with a pur energy ship, how
would the occupants survive? Einstein never said you needed a pure
energy ship, just a vessel that could take the strain of being
converted to matter. Geesh. Why does he make such rash
generalizations on things he doesn't know? He talks about what the
aliens intentions are, why they are doing things, what interest they
have, where they come from even (another dimension) but HOW would he
know these things? Psycho Dave already debunked the bulk of the
material he shows over and over again in his videos, such as space
debris supposed change in trajectory, but anyone who doesn't know
aerodynamics or space physics can debunk his logic and reasoning. He's
unoriginal for the most part, mostly borrows from previous UFO
"scientist," talks in a really boring manner (I can't believe he has
that tone of voice! Geesh) and doesn't have the evidence he promises,
just speculation. He even admits that. I've heard about this guy from
other UFO dicks, and I have to say, I was expecting a challenge. But
like C.S. Lewis, his logic is flawed, and the real reason he believes
in UFO's is 'cause one day he woke up and said he saw one. Read about
his experiences in the 1960's, it's true. He's not convincing any
skeptics, just making them more skeptical of the UFO movement.
Psycho Dave
NOT using the knowledge that got you the degree, when making claims
about the natural world, makes you a f*cking moron!