Often self-representing dietary vegans emphasize the animal advocacy in their presentation of what (their?) 'veganism' is. Also, (IMO too) often, the advocate frames the presentation around what s/he finds most tolerable or salable (sail-able?) or personally comfortable - then works from there. I've seen, also, many very non-encyclopedic quality statements which, though very good, don't SUCCINCTLY evaluate the pros and cons of choosing one sub-path or the other.
Again, this is about VEGAN-COMPLIANT diets.
Clarity and 'economy' of statement - few words, as many words as are needed - but no more... unless the secondary or subsidiary portion illuminates or clarifies with examples.
Again, the discussion is NOT about 'why' I'm doing this. It's about the most successful PRODUCT: clear, succinct statement about the vegan CULINARY (not diet) standard - a vegan compliant culinary standard, whether for a group to contract with a food service or institution, or for a family to provide a legal basis to sue an elderly home if they don't provide the vegan parent with fully vegan meals, if that's in the contract, or for a student to expect that some vegan compliant food standards are maintained constantly throughout her or his years in an institution served by an instituional food service.
Maynard
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Maynard S. Clark, MS (Management: Research Administration)
Google Voice (
617-615-9672)
reaches all phones
Possibly corrective notes so far:
* a vegan-compliant culinary style or genre
* any vegan-compliant culinary style or genre