Ed Trice loses his mind? Admits to losing 21 million suit and libles an Alabama Judge.
6 views
Skip to first unread message
Rob
Jan 7, 2009, 5:27:28 PM1/7/09
to labat...@sbcglobal.net, uscf-...@googlegroups.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Rob <robmt...@gmail.com>
Date: Jan 6, 3:26 pm
Subject: Ed Trice loses his mind? Admits to losing 21 million suit and
libles an Alabama Judge.
To: rec.games.chess.politics, rec.games.chess.misc
On Jan 6, 2:56 pm, "Jon D'Souza-Eva" <jon.dsouza...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Note that Trice has acknowledged that the judgement that Edward Labate
> won against him is for real and insults the judge, Labate's lawyer and
> Labate himself! Previously Trice has claimed that the whole thing is a
> complete fabrication (for example here:http://tinyurl.com/8csems)
Dosen't he not only admit the judgement is real but also he accuses a
sitting judge of conspiracy? He even libels the judge by claiming
publicly the judge is under inditement for conspiracy? I guess if you
are digging a hole you may as well make it a deep one.
Rob
Jan 7, 2009, 8:09:03 PM1/7/09
to uscf-...@googlegroups.com, labat...@sbcglobal.net, uscf-...@googlegroups.com
On Jan 7, 10:33 am, Rob <robmt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 7, 3:36 am, samsloan <samhsl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 6, 5:50 pm, onech...@comcast.net wrote:
>
> > > But let us asses here the basis of Sloan's own intelligence. Sloan has
> > > consistently quoted this guy's site, regardless of its authenticity,
> > > as declared by a court in its judgement of 21,000,000 dollars
>
> > > The Sloan still wants to trash Rob Mitchell who he perceives as a
> > > political opponent, and someone who challenges the Sloan to ethical
> > > behaviors.
>
> > > Phil Innes
>
> > I have not quoted "this guys site". Rather I have quoted a letter
> > written by Rob Mitchell that is posted on his site. Rob had admitted
> > that he wrote the letter.
>
> WRONG! I never wrote that letter. It was composed by two other people,
> now me.
> I NEVER said I wrote the letter. It was done by the "collective" WE of
> an LLC. I had some input, but almost none when it came to the drafting
> of the document.
>
> > Also, I do not perceive Rob as a political opponent. I have stated
> > that I will support him for election.
>
> Isn't that like getting Satan's support for being elected Pope?
>
> > As to the name "Rob the Robber", that name has become so widely used
> > and accepted that he might as well stop trying to live it down and
> > take advantage of it.
>
> It's only used by you.
>
> > Rob the Robber, He's our man
> > Will he rob you, Yes he can
> > Vote for Rob the Robber
>
> Trice can't get anything right.
>
> This is something Trice posted"Hey "Rob the robber" Mitchell, try and
> con anyone out of $30,000 this week? Or do you still say you contacted
> Bobby Fischer and you tried to charge $30,000 for all of your out of
> pocket expenses? You are a lying, piece of shit "
>
> He obviously cannot read the deal memo he posted. Or is the amount
> coming from something ha hasn't posted?
>
> Look, This is all I will say and I will only say it once:
>
> We (the LLC) began to feel that ET was not presenting anything real. 4
> "memo" of understanding were produced. It was decided by other members
> of the LLC to place a financial clause in the contract. It is
> commonplace for retainers to be requested and paid. Trice agreed to
> deal memo revision #4 and signed it and the confidentiality
> agreement . He then proceeded to violate both and we (the LLC)
> terminated our association with Trice.
>
> Now for the claim we had not spoken to the potential players; I never
> said I or the LLC had. Read what the statement says. We used an
> associate to make contact. I will leave that up to him to comment or
> not to comment. Had Fischer and Karpov ever heard of the LLC, I doubt
> it. Why would they? The LLC didn't contact them directly. Contact was
> made via our intermediary.
>
> Trice made one telling comment on the phone,"I don't want anyone
> involved in this that dosen't have the vision. They need to be willing
> to do what is necessary to make this happen. If they want to be paid
> pennies up front to work instead of millions at the pay out... F_ _ _
> em! I don't want them to be a part of it"
>
> He had an idea he wanted to make a reality. He wanted others to do his
> work for him and do it without pay. We simply decided we didn't want
> to be a part of his "snake-oil side show". We wished him well and WE
> and specifically ME personally terminated our relationship.
> On Jan 7, 3:36 am, samsloan <samhsl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 6, 5:50 pm, onech...@comcast.net wrote:
>
> > > But let us asses here the basis of Sloan's own intelligence. Sloan has
> > > consistently quoted this guy's site, regardless of its authenticity,
> > > as declared by a court in its judgement of 21,000,000 dollars
>
> > > The Sloan still wants to trash Rob Mitchell who he perceives as a
> > > political opponent, and someone who challenges the Sloan to ethical
> > > behaviors.
>
> > > Phil Innes
>
> > I have not quoted "this guys site". Rather I have quoted a letter
> > written by Rob Mitchell that is posted on his site. Rob had admitted
> > that he wrote the letter.
>
> WRONG! I never wrote that letter. It was composed by two other people,
> now me.
> I NEVER said I wrote the letter. It was done by the "collective" WE of
> an LLC. I had some input, but almost none when it came to the drafting
> of the document.
>
> > Also, I do not perceive Rob as a political opponent. I have stated
> > that I will support him for election.
>
> Isn't that like getting Satan's support for being elected Pope?
>
> > As to the name "Rob the Robber", that name has become so widely used
> > and accepted that he might as well stop trying to live it down and
> > take advantage of it.
>
> It's only used by you.
>
> > Rob the Robber, He's our man
> > Will he rob you, Yes he can
> > Vote for Rob the Robber
>
> Trice can't get anything right.
>
> This is something Trice posted"Hey "Rob the robber" Mitchell, try and
> con anyone out of $30,000 this week? Or do you still say you contacted
> Bobby Fischer and you tried to charge $30,000 for all of your out of
> pocket expenses? You are a lying, piece of shit "
>
> He obviously cannot read the deal memo he posted. Or is the amount
> coming from something ha hasn't posted?
>
> Look, This is all I will say and I will only say it once:
>
> We (the LLC) began to feel that ET was not presenting anything real. 4
> "memo" of understanding were produced. It was decided by other members
> of the LLC to place a financial clause in the contract. It is
> commonplace for retainers to be requested and paid. Trice agreed to
> deal memo revision #4 and signed it and the confidentiality
> agreement . He then proceeded to violate both and we (the LLC)
> terminated our association with Trice.
>
> Now for the claim we had not spoken to the potential players; I never
> said I or the LLC had. Read what the statement says. We used an
> associate to make contact. I will leave that up to him to comment or
> not to comment. Had Fischer and Karpov ever heard of the LLC, I doubt
> it. Why would they? The LLC didn't contact them directly. Contact was
> made via our intermediary.
>
> Trice made one telling comment on the phone,"I don't want anyone
> involved in this that dosen't have the vision. They need to be willing
> to do what is necessary to make this happen. If they want to be paid
> pennies up front to work instead of millions at the pay out... F_ _ _
> em! I don't want them to be a part of it"
>
> He had an idea he wanted to make a reality. He wanted others to do his
> work for him and do it without pay. We simply decided we didn't want
> to be a part of his "snake-oil side show". We wished him well and WE
> and specifically ME personally terminated our relationship.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages