Polgar Betrayal/ was: Idiots amongst us

[Rob]

On Mar 28, 5:25 pm, help bot <nomorech...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 28, 10:27 am, Rob <robmt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I give everything the benefit of the doubt until proven otherwise.
> > >    I distinctly remember you dismissing
> > > any and all criticisms of the Great Dr.
> > > IMnes on a whim, without any real
> > > consideration whatever.   When asked
> > > why you were so eager to do this, you
> > > explained that he had merely answered
> > > some question of yours.   In sum, you
> > > appear to be /peculiarly selective/ in
> > > your giving... .
> > Things change. I don't throw friends under a bus for money.
>
>   What have busses and money to do with
> your obvious confusion regarding how you
> desire others to /think/ you act, and how
> you /really/ do, here in rgc?
>
>   Don't get me wrong, I love discussing
> busses and how they can be used to help
> deal with the criminal element (see Mr.
> Hyatt and the State vs. child molesters).
>
>   And as for friends, well, friends are not
> those who exert masterial control over
> their hapless mind-slaves; no, a friend is
> someone who would never even consider
> doing such a thing.     As I've mentioned
> many times, when Mr. Evans criticized
> Mr. Fischer's so-called demands by
> pointing out that they were unfair, he was,
> IMO, doing what a true friend does-- and
> those other people, BF's "supporters",
> who crafted silly arguments regarding
> mathematics and less-unfairness and
> dragon-slaying and commie-bashing
> and so forth, were the opposite of true
> friends.
>
>   Speaking of giving the benefit of the
> doubt... how on Earth would such a
> person, even if he did exist, handle the
> situation where one side claims they
> have the smoking gun, or proof of guilt,
> while another side claims the smoke is
> from a barbeque and the gun was put
> in their hands by some unnamed
> culprit, a one-armed man who had
> out-wrestled them in the dark?
>
>   My reaction is to ask how could a one-
> armed person manage all this?  As Mr.
> Peck showed in the movie To Kill a
> Mockingbird, the jury will think what it
> wants to think regarding who can do
> what, and you have to throw a baseball
> at someone's head in order to prove
> otherwise.   In another case, Mr. Peck
> beat up Charelton Heston (The Big
> Country), and in another one  (The
> Snows of Killlamanjaro) he dove into a
> lake filled to overflowing with dangerous
> hippos, to save a boy who had fallen
> out of the boat.   Although the scene
> was cut, he wrestled two giant alli-
> gators while underwater, thus breaking
> Tarzan's longstanding record.
>
>   But how did I get so sidetracked here?
> Oh yes, the bizarre comment regarding
> busses and money, which of course
> has nothing to do with my refutation of
> the ridiculous claim at the very top of
> this post.
>
>   As I mentioned before, when critics
> asked why you (Mr.Mitchell) refused to
> listen to reason on the matter of the
> Great Dr. IMnes and his nuttery, your
> reply in itself was a clear refutation of
> any such claim, for not only was the
> benefit of doubt withheld, it was never
> even asked "why" so many readers
> here had the same, low opinion of Dr.
> IMnes, the self-proclaimed 2450 and
> nearly-an-IM, and USCF Expert.
>
>   Just to let you know-- some people
> around here are talking about the
> "strange coincidence" of nuttery and
> spelling problems and identical foes
> and interests between you two; it is
> conjectured that a split personality is
> perhaps the simplest explanation--
> the Occam's Razor solution to the
> equation, which accounts for just
> about every one of those bizarre
> coincidences.    Dissenters suggest
> that the Great Dr. IMnes may have
> created multiple monikers, to lend an
> appearance of heft, ala Larry Parr,
> and it is true that he created other
> things in the past, such as imaginary
> titles and ratings.
>
>   But I dismiss such theories, on the
> grounds that these pseudo-scientists
> are too lazy to look at posting headers,
> or to recognize the clear superiority of
> RM's writing style to that of Dr. IMnes
> (whose style often resembles that of
> an uneducated, drunken fishwife).
>
>   -- help bot

Lokk Greg. If you doubt who I am .. a quick google search for
"insurance,nashville" will show you me.
Mr. Innes has embarked on a course of action in regards to friends
that I do not agree with and he is doing it for money's sake. He is
leaving Chessville and is going to publish something which could
possible end the careers of people .I would write this to you directly
but you have hidden your email address so I cannot.