kenneth harrow
professor emeritus
dept of english
michigan state university
Ken:
As in many wars, the longer it drags the more it fades from regular conversation. I don’t follow the war anymore. My arguments remain the same:
TF
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/BL1PR12MB5191F89003C2E5683696236FDAB29%40BL1PR12MB5191.namprd12.prod.outlook.com.
kenneth harrow
professor emeritus
dept of english
michigan state university
Peace is the key, but it won’t be a clean exercise…it won’t satisfy any of the parties.
I don’t do the sovereignty argument. I have never seen where it works well for weaker nations. I can give over a hundred examples where the argument on state sovereignty collapses, from all colonial conquest to global domination to globalization.
On paper, yes. In practice, no.
Indeed, what we call the “sovereign” can be the cumulation of elite interests.
Glad some conversation can continue.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/BL1PR12MB519180355A0FB3305DAA8C34DAB59%40BL1PR12MB5191.namprd12.prod.outlook.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/usaafricadialogue/BL1PR12MB519180355A0FB3305DAA8C34DAB59%40BL1PR12MB5191.namprd12.prod.outlook.com.
I wonder what insight social / cognitive psychologists and anthropologists could provide us into the mystery of how/why the normal human mind works along the full range of crazy to smart, irrational to the rational, especially in crowd contexts and in crisis time.
This war, like many others, sure reinforces the sentiment that life is defined more than by mere rationality; emotion often warp, sweep away, or re-conceptualize rationality. Otherwise, how do we explain a weeping soldier father who has just lost his soldier son in the war resolutely heading right back to the warfront immediately the funeral of his son was over.
Femi J. Kolapo |
IMPROVE LIFE |
________
A thought for the month:
Western Military Analysts, Including the CIA, Dazed and Confused
By Larry Johnson, June 22, 2022 [excerpt]
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/57081.htm
One of the old intel codgers, Graham E. Fuller, who was Vice Chair of the National Intelligence Council at CIA back when I was an analyst,
has it figured out. He wrote a piece sure to get him removed from woke Washington, DC parties:
The war in Ukraine has dragged on long enough now to reveal certain clear trajectories. First, two fundamental realities:
· Putin is to be condemned for launching this war– as is virtually any leader who launches any war.
Putin can be termed a war criminal–in good company with George W. Bush who has killed vastly greater numbers than Putin.
· Secondary condemnation belongs to the US (NATO) in deliberately provoking a war with Russia by implacably pushing
its hostile military organization, despite Moscow’s repeated notifications about crossing red lines, right up to the gates of Russia.
This war did not have to be if Ukranian neutrality, á la Finland and Austria, had been accepted. Instead Washington has called
for clear Russian defeat.
Contrary to Washington’s triumphalist pronouncements, Russia is winning the war, Ukraine has lost the war.
Any longer-term damage to Russia is open to debate.
Sadly for Washington, nearly every single one of its expectations about this war are turning out to be incorrect. Indeed the West may come
to look back at this moment as the final argument against following Washington’s quest for global dominance into ever newer and more
dangerous and damaging confrontations with Eurasia. And most of the rest of the world–Latin America, India, the Middle East and Africa–
find few national interests in this fundamentally American war against Russia
EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click any links or open any attachments unless you trust the sender and know the content is safe.
kenneth harrow
professor emeritus
dept of english
michigan state university