arijit
unread,Apr 16, 2011, 1:44:30 PM4/16/11Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to UCSB Computer Science 240A Spring 2011
Hi,
1) I was wondering if the other groups are also experiencing the
following type of running time anomalies. For a fixed value of k, as
we increase p, the running time also increases; i.e.
k=96, p=1 Elapsed time during CGSOLVE: 0.122765
k=96, p=2 Elapsed time during CGSOLVE: 0.159117
k=96, p=4 Elapsed time during CGSOLVE: 0.423924
k=96, p=8 Elapsed time during CGSOLVE: 0.603213
k=96, p=12 Elapsed time during CGSOLVE: 0.756158
k=96, p=16 Elapsed time during CGSOLVE: 0.934735
k=96, p=32 Elapsed time during CGSOLVE: 1.741897
Is it because the data transferring time dominates over the parallel
computation time?
2) Currently my available balance shows 346. I guess, this is the
utilization time left in minute; and it will not keep on decreasing if
someone does not use the triton a/c for some period of time.
Thanks,
Arijit