... Since my site used to host my blog, I was wanting a "feed" that could alert of changes and updates by subscribing to http://dullroar.com/atom.xml for anyone who still uses a feed reader in this day and age (I do, but at age 54 I expect the tech tribe to push me out on the ice floe any day now :). ...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddl...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
So what has the "techie crowd" moved on to? I'd hate to attract their attention accidentally, just by letting someone see that I still rely on feeds. :-)
However, when I try to start TW with the following command:{"description": "Basic client-server edition","plugins": ["tiddlywiki/tiddlyweb","tiddlywiki/filesystem","tiddlywiki/codemirror","tiddlywiki/highlight"],"themes": ["tiddlywiki/vanilla","tiddlywiki/snowwhite"]}
node tiddlywiki --server 8083 $:/core/save/lazy-images text/plain text/html Jim...I get the following error:
I get the same stack trace in Linux.fs.js:439return binding.open(pathModule._makeLong(path), stringToFlags(flags), mode);^Error: ENOENT, no such file or directory 'C:\Users\jimle_000\Dropbox\Sandbox\TiddlyWiki5\plugins\tiddlywiki\plugin.info'at Object.fs.openSync (fs.js:439:18)at Object.fs.readFileSync (fs.js:290:15)at $tw.loadPluginFolder (C:\Users\jimle_000\Dropbox\Sandbox\TiddlyWiki5\boot\boot.js:1461:34)at $tw.loadWikiTiddlers (C:\Users\jimle_000\Dropbox\Sandbox\TiddlyWiki5\boot\boot.js:1631:23)at $tw.loadTiddlersNode (C:\Users\jimle_000\Dropbox\Sandbox\TiddlyWiki5\boot\boot.js:1671:27)at $tw.boot.startup (C:\Users\jimle_000\Dropbox\Sandbox\TiddlyWiki5\boot\boot.js:1781:7)at C:\Users\jimle_000\Dropbox\Sandbox\TiddlyWiki5\boot\boot.js:1950:12at $tw.boot.decryptEncryptedTiddlers (C:\Users\jimle_000\Dropbox\Sandbox\TiddlyWiki5\boot\boot.js:1375:2)at $tw.boot.boot (C:\Users\jimle_000\Dropbox\Sandbox\TiddlyWiki5\boot\boot.js:1948:11)at Object.<anonymous> (C:\Users\jimle_000\Dropbox\Sandbox\TiddlyWiki5\tiddlywiki.js:13:10)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddl...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Hi Jim
> Copied a "Basic client-server edition" tiddlywiki.info file into the root of the repo, to wit:
That's the problem: you're trying to re-use the TiddlyWiki repo as a wiki folder. You should either create your wiki folder separately, or put it in the 'editions' folder.
In essence, Twitter is a constantly updated round table discussion — nobody ever discusses their opinion in-depth but adds their two cents here and there. A consequence of that discussion is the inevitable drowning out of some unique, knowledgeable and smart voices. Some of the best arguments are caught in the mix.
RSS, in contrast, reminds me of a scientific debate that takes place between science journal publications. Each writer is allowed to venture deeper into their argument and a retort or response is dealt with some lag time in between.
I get at least half of my news via the Feedly reader (and I'm but a young lad at 41). I just subscribed to your channel and, by the way, and I agree it "should probably support content elements for a "full feed" experience" ;-)
And I "+1" that other point about permalinks too.
Here's a nice read on RSS vs Twitter. I don't know if it is Don Quijote fighting new tech but the article is only a year old and statements like the following do make me buy:
[...] would this allow for a user to have this feed inside a TW and have updaes on external Tiddlywikis automatically be reflected in the users TW?
This sounds like the federation ideas we've been discussing in recent hangouts.
Doing it would be effectively making TW be a consumer of ATOM feeds, rather than a publisher, as here.
We'd also need to extend/replace the ATOM file format with something that allows raw tiddlers to be published.