Here's my question.
What does becomeing a Thelemite intell? What would I be infor?
Also what is the point of the E.C.G. and the Gnostic Mass?
Love is the Law. Love under Will.
For succint info, check out http://oto-usa.org/faq.html#q_thelema
As for the E.C.G. & the Gnostic Mass, I have not yet attended one, so I
can only refer you to the "official" line:
Regarding the "churchiness" of the Gnostic Mass, I just found the
following in Liber LXI Vel Causae (v.23), and it pretty much takes care
of the issue:
"Or should the ritual speak in terms (however vague) which seem to
imply Egyptian, Taoist, Buddhist, Indian, Persian, Greek, Judaic,
Christian, or Moslem philosophy, let him reflect that this is a defect
of language; the literary limitation and not the spiritual prejudice
of the man P."
I used to go to Gnostic Mass once or twice a week. It's a wonderful
thing to see.
93 93/93
The E.G.C. is a "religious" group within the O.T.O.
The Gnostic Mass is a celabration of the Tree of Life.
93 93/93
'Regarding the "churchiness" of the Gnostic Mass, I just found the
following in Liber LXI Vel Causae (v.23), and it pretty much takes care
of the issue:
'"Or should the ritual speak in terms (however vague) which seem to
imply Egyptian, Taoist, Buddhist, Indian, Persian, Greek, Judaic,
Christian, or Moslem philosophy, let him reflect that this is a defect
of language; the literary limitation and not the spiritual prejudice of
the man P."'
~~~~~~~~~
As for Satanism & Christianity, I should note that I stumbled across it
in the early '70s, when LaVey was it's only public proponent. Even at
11yrs old, it struck me as being almost completely a reaction or
rebellion against Chistianity, and therefore held no interest for me.
I know it has grown & evolved philosophically since then, but it still
works out - for me - to an overly reactionary system (i.e., it derives
too much of it's identity by comparing &/or contrasting itself with
"old-world" religious paths), rather than the self-sustaining path of
Thelema.
The Satanists I've come to know in the past year are not particularly
involved with Thelema.... Not with conscious intent, anyway! They do,
of course, promote an ideology that closely parallels Liber OZ. They
just don't necessarily embrace Liber AL, which is what can be
considered to be a distinguishing characteristic of the Thelemite.
And that raises an interesting question; what DOES define a Thelemite
AS a Thelemite?
I do know quite a number of Thelemic Masons; even Lon DuQuette is
active in a Masonic Lodge in California. I'm master of the local
Scottish Rite Lodge of Perfection, which happens to have the oldest
surviving Scottish Rite charter still in continuous operation. But,
even there, there's serious antagonism to anything remotely
"philosophical" or esoteric, despite the Supreme Council's official
recognition that esotericism may well be a good way to recoup
membership losses as the "old guard" dies off.
Anyway, I was thinking of the various movies that have come out in
recent years. Two negative movies, both based on Alan Moore
comics/graphic novels are "From Hell" & "League of Extraordinary
Gentlemenn". The last is particularly weird, because at least two of
the heros - Alan Quartermain & Tom Sawyer - are the creations of
Freemasons H. Rider Haggard & Samuel Clemens.
The positive - if fanciful - movie is, of course, "National Treasure".
Another issue is the news coverage - and various reactions to that
coverage - of the "Masonic" shooting in Patchogue last year. The
shooter just got sentenced a few days ago to 5 years, suspended, for
criminally negligent homicide. That was a very weird situation. I knew
everyone involved, especially the victim, William James. I had just
conferred the 14° of the Scottish Rite on him a few weeks before he was
killed.
Actually <poking head out> i'm a satanist and a thelemite. I found
laveys philosophy too rigid and dark by itself, but then i had been
into Old Uncle Al and Liber AL for 10 years by that time.
Most serious satanists <note i do not capitalize the word> are in fact
into thelema or at least grounded in it.
I come from 11 generations of Masons and have already been invited to
join the local lodge, but i am actually waiting as i do not feel mature
enough to procede.
Now as to what a thelemite defines as a thelemite...i go with the
earlier sanctioned definition. Acceptance of at least the principal of
the message of mater therion and libers Oz and Al would be my criteria.
One cannot remain unchanged in the face of the internal arguments that
those documents create.
Anyone else have any thoughts on this?
i hate calling myself anything, but with all the bullhuckey floating
out there, one does have to take a stand somewhere, IMHO, of course.
E.g.; I am a Jewish Odinist and a Messianic Thelemite!
Mike Noxaura
HM RCOS
"Where a sense of humor always comes first"