第三节
在成功的击退亚细亚哥特人的劫掠之后,帕尔米拉王回到叙利亚的埃梅沙城。尽管在战场上战无不胜,他却在这里因国内叛乱而人头落地,而且起因是他最喜欢的娱乐活动——狩猎,至少是在狩猎时亡命的。(56)据称他的侄子马奥纽斯,在他面前投掷标枪时;尽管他一再纠正他的错误,马奥纽斯却依然傲慢如故。作为一个君主,同时是一个运动爱好者的奥登纳图斯被激怒了,下令夺走了他的坐骑——这在野蛮人中被视作是侮辱——并给这个鲁莽的青年一个短期禁闭的惩罚。对君主的冒犯很快就被淡忘了,而惩罚的耻辱却被铭记于心;马奥纽斯纠集几个敢死之士,在一次大狩猎的过程中刺杀了他的叔叔。奥登纳图斯的儿子希律——一个性情温和柔弱的年青人,虽然并非季诺碧亚所生,也和他父亲一起死于非命。(57)然而,马奥纽斯得到的仅仅是由血腥的行为带来的复仇的快感。他还没来得及僭称“奥古斯都”的称号,已经被季诺碧亚当作祭奠她丈夫的祭品给处决了。(58)
注释56:参照Hist. August. p. 192, 193. Zosimus, l. i. p. 36.
Zonaras, l. xii p. 633.
结局是清楚可信的,其他的则晦暗不明难圆其说。Syncellus的文本,如果并非以讹传讹的话,绝对是胡言乱语。
注释57:奥登纳图斯和季诺碧亚对他溺爱有加,让他免于敌人的攻击,给他许多许多快乐无比的珍宝和古玩。
注释58:有些不公正的怀疑将目光投向季诺碧亚,认为貌似她是其丈夫死亡的同谋者。
Chapter XI: Reign Of Claudius, Defeat Of The Goths.
Part III.
After a successful expedition against the Gothic plunderers
of Asia, the Palmyrenian prince returned to the city of Emesa in
Syria. Invincible in war, he was there cut off by domestic
treason, and his favorite amusement of hunting was the cause, or
at least the occasion, of his death. ^56 His nephew Maeonius
presumed to dart his javelin before that of his uncle; and though
admonished of his error, repeated the same insolence. As a
monarch, and as a sportsman, Odenathus was provoked, took away
his horse, a mark of ignominy among the barbarians, and chastised
the rash youth by a short confinement. The offence was soon
forgot, but the punishment was remembered; and Maeonius, with a
few daring associates, assassinated his uncle in the midst of a
great entertainment. Herod, the son of Odenathus, though not of
Zenobia, a young man of a soft and effeminate temper, ^57 was
killed with his father. But Maeonius obtained only the pleasure
of revenge by this bloody deed. He had scarcely time to assume
the title of Augustus, before he was sacrificed by Zenobia to the
memory of her husband. ^58
[Footnote 56: Hist. August. p. 192, 193. Zosimus, l. i. p. 36.
Zonaras, l. xii p. 633. The last is clear and probable, the
others confused and inconsistent. The text of Syncellus, if not
corrupt, is absolute nonsense.]
[Footnote 57: Odenathus and Zenobia often sent him, from the
spoils of the enemy, presents of gems and toys, which he received
with infinite delight.]
[Footnote 58: Some very unjust suspicions have been cast on
Zenobia, as if she was accessory to her husband's death.]
[Footnote 60: See, in Hist. August. p. 198, Aurelian's testimony
to her merit; and for the conquest of Egypt, Zosimus, l. i. p.
39, 40.]
[Footnote *: This seems very doubtful. Claudius, during all his
reign, is represented as emperor on the medals of Alexandria,
which are very numerous. If Zenobia possessed any power in Egypt,
it could only have been at the beginning of the reign of
Aurelian. The same circumstance throws great improbability on
her conquests in Galatia. Perhaps Zenobia administered Egypt in
the name of Claudius, and emboldened by the death of that prince,
subjected it to her own power. - G.]
[Footnote 61: Timolaus, Herennianus, and Vaballathus. It is
supposed that the two former were already dead before the war.
On the last, Aurelian bestowed a small province of Armenia, with
the title of King; several of his medals are still extant. See
Tillemont, tom. 3, p. 1190.]
[Footnote 62: Zosimus, l. i. p. 44.]
[Footnote 63: Vopiscus (in Hist. August. p. 217) gives us an
authentic letter and a doubtful vision, of Aurelian. Apollonius
of Tyana was born about the same time as Jesus Christ. His life
(that of the former) is related in so fabulous a manner by his
disciples, that we are at a loss to discover whether he was a
sage, an impostor, or a fanatic.]
[Footnote 64: Zosimus, l. i. p. 46.]
[Footnote 66: Vopiscus (in Hist. August. p. 217) mentions only
the second.]
[Footnote 67: Zosimus, l. i. p. 44 - 48. His account of the two
battles is clear and circumstantial.]
Note: Talmor, or Palmyra, was probably at a very early
period the connecting link between the commerce of Tyre and
Babylon. Heeren, Ideen, v. i. p. ii. p. 125. Tadmor was
probably built by Solomon as a commercial station. Hist. of
Jews, v. p. 271 - M.]
[Footnote 69: Some English travellers from Aleppo discovered the
ruins of Palmyra about the end of the last century. Our
curiosity has since been gratified in a more splendid manner by
Messieurs Wood and Dawkins. For the history of Palmyra, we may
consult the masterly dissertation of Dr. Halley in the
Philosophical Transactions: Lowthorp's Abridgment, vol. iii. p.
518.]