Fw: Idea for improving affordable housing availaibility

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Forest Pearson

unread,
Dec 9, 2011, 1:23:46 PM12/9/11
to TransitionWhitehorse, yukonantipov...@gmail.com
Hello all,

I thought I would share my input to YG's recent request for ideas to faciliate afforable housing.  Hope some may find this of interest.
 
-Forest Pearson

“Love is better than anger. Hope is better than fear. Optimism is better than despair. So let us be loving, hopeful and optimistic. And we’ll change the world.” —Jack Layton, August 20, 2011

http://forestpearson.blogspot.com/
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Forest Pearson <fkpear...@yahoo.com>
To: "colin.m...@gov.yk.ca" <colin.m...@gov.yk.ca>
Cc: "mike...@whitehorse.ca" <mike...@whitehorse.ca>; "dale....@gov.yk.ca" <dale....@gov.yk.ca>; "Dennis....@whitehorse.ca" <Dennis....@whitehorse.ca>
Sent: Friday, December 9, 2011 9:24:57 AM
Subject: Idea for improving affordable housing availaibility

Hi Colin,

I heard you on the radio today speaking about your public comment / input period regrading ideas for improving affordable housing availability.  So, I'm sending my thoughts along none the less in hopes that they are taken into consideration.

My specific suggestion is to move to land value taxation from our current property improvement tax system.  A solution lies in how property tax is assessed and would be revenue neutral (ie. wouldn't cost government anything).  Our current tax assessment process is primarily based on the value of the improvements on the property, with less emphasis given to the land value itself.  This assessment method is actually a disincentive to redevelopment and development of revenue generating buildings (e.g. rental or multi-housing).  In fact, under our current property tax assessment system, holding fallow or underutilized land for speculation is encouraged.  This is because if a developer wishes to develop a high quality, multi-use building, the tax on that property rises, whereas if they do nothing, or construct a low-quality development, the property tax is lower. 
 
The alternative to property tax assessment is land-value taxation.  Under this system, the tax on real estate is commensurate with the site's potential value, regardless of what buildings may occupy the site.  Therefore, holding fallow or underutilized land is a cost to the developer.  The developer will want to construct the highest quality (and highest income yielding) development on the property as possible, comfortable in knowing the taxation will not change significantly.  Under the land-value taxation system, holding land is expensive, and high-quality re-development is actually encouraged by the taxation system. A good overview is found on wikipedia at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_value_tax, or another nice summary of this system can be found at: http://www.sprawlwatch.org/taxincentives.html
 
Obviously the land-value taxation would be gradually moved to over a number of years so land-owners know it is coming and it doesn't cause a tax-shock for them.  For example, increase the land portion of the tax assessment by 10% and decrease the improvement portion by 10% every year for 10 year.  At the end, the tax would be assessed 100% on land and 0% on improvements.  The specific rates would need to be looked at so that on balance the tax is revenue-neutral relative to the current tax base. 

This would be an easy, revenue neutral way to get some of that fallow-land in Whitehorse into providing housing for people, and would ultimately lead to a better built environment for the community.  The City has been criticized for "not doing its part" by allowing all these derelict lots downtown, but instead going and developing in new areas.  This could be a means to directly show that the municipality, supported by YG, is doing its part to provide sustainable housing to the community.

I hope that this is something we can move towards.  Thank you for taking my input. 

-Forest Pearson

“Love is better than anger. Hope is better than fear. Optimism is better than despair. So let us be loving, hopeful and optimistic. And we’ll change the world.” —Jack Layton, August 20, 2011

http://forestpearson.blogspot.com/


Erica Heuer

unread,
Dec 9, 2011, 1:42:16 PM12/9/11
to ttwhit...@googlegroups.com
Fabulous!
___________________________________
erica heuer
yoga in the alpine  ::  www.yogayukon.ca
Upstairs, Alpine Bakery, 411 Alexander Street

wallymaltz communications + design
7 Cassino Street, Whitehorse, YT  ::  Y1A 3B9






--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Transition Whitehorse" group.
To post to this group, send email to TTWhit...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
TTWhitehorse...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/TTWhitehorse

Marlon Davis

unread,
Dec 13, 2011, 10:58:38 PM12/13/11
to ttwhit...@googlegroups.com
fascinating!

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages